This study examines the structural validity of scores from the Bem Sex Role Inventory using a maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Six hundred and sixty-five graduate and undergraduate students participate in the study. A seven firstorder factor model almost identical to the model reported in a previous CFA study is used as the baseline comparison model. The data for testing these models are obtained from an exploratory sample randomly selected from the whole sample. A hierarchical factor structure model with seven first-order factors (compassionate, interpersonal affect, shy, dominant, decisive, athletic, and self-sufficient) and two second-order factors (masculinity and femininity) fit the data quite well. The fit indices based on the validation sample collectively indicate a very good fit. The results of this study are notably consistent with the hierarchical factor models suggested in two previous CFA studies.
Blanchard-Fields, F., Suhrer-Roussel, L., & Hertzog, C. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the Bem Sex Role Inventory: Old questions, new answers. Sex Roles,30, 423-457.
6.
Byrne, B.M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Campbell, T., Gillaspy, J.A., Jr. , & Thompson, B. (1997). The factor structure of the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI): Confirmatory analysis of long and short forms. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 118-124.
8.
Choi, N., & Fuqua, D.R. (2003). The structure of the Bem Sex Role Inventory: A summary report of 23 validation studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 872-887.
9.
Choi, N., & Jenkins, S. (2000, April). A factor analysis of the Bem Sex Role Inventory and the Personal Attributes Questionnaire. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association , New Orleans, LA.
10.
Collins, M., Waters, C.W., & Waters, L.K. (1979). Factor analysis of sex-typed items from the Bem Sex Role Inventory: A replication. Psychological Reports, 44, 517-518.
11.
Comrey, A.L. (1970). Manual for Comrey Personality Scales. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service .
12.
Gaa, J.P., Liberman, D., & Edwards, T.A. (1979). A comparative factor analysis of the Bem Sex Role Inventory and the Personal Attribute Questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 35, 592-598.
Henson, R.K. (2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 177-189.
15.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (2000). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
16.
Kline, R.B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
17.
Marsh, H.W., & Myers, M. (1986). Masculinity, femininity, and androgyny: A methodological and theoretical critique. Sex Roles,14, 397-430.
18.
Martin, H.J., & Ramanaiah, N.V. (1988). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Bem Sex Role Inventory. Psychological Reports, 62, 343-350.
19.
Maznah, I., & Choo, P.F. (1986). The factor structure of the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI). International Journal of Psychology, 21, 31-41.
20.
Nasser, F., Takahashi, T., & Benson, J. (1997). The structure of test anxiety in Israeli-Arab high school students: An application of confirmatory factor analysis with miniscales. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 10, 129-151.
21.
Nasser, F., & Wisenbaker, J. (2003). A Monte Carlo study investigating the impact of item parceling on measures of fit in confirmatory factor analysis . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 729-757.
22.
Pedhazur, E.J., & Tetenbaum, T.J. (1979). Bem Sex Role Inventory: A theoretical and methodological critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 996-1016.
23.
Spence, J.T. (1991). Do the BSRI and the PAQ measure the same or different concepts?Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 141-165.
24.
Spence, J.T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relationship to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology32, 29-39.
25.
Sugihara, Y., & Katsurada, E. (1999). Masculinity and femininity in Japanese culture: A pilot study. Sex Roles,40, 635-646.
26.
Thompson, B. (1989). Meta-analysis of factor structure studies: A case study example with Bem's androgyny measure. Journal of Experimental Education, 57, 187-197.
27.
Thompson, B. (2000). Ten commandments of structural equation modeling . In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 261-283). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
28.
Thompson, B., & Melancon, J.G. (1986). Factor structure of the Bem Sex Role Inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 19, 77-83.
29.
Windle, M., & Sinnott, J.D. (1985). A psychometric study of the Bem Sex Role Inventory with an old sample. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 336-343.
30.
Yuan, K.H., Bentler, P.M., & Kano, Y. (1997). On averaging variables in a CFA model. Behaviormetrika, 24, 71-83.
