Abstract
Regression models used in the analysis of interrupted time-series designs assume statistically independent errors. Four methods of evaluating this assumption are the Durbin-Watson (D-W), Huitema-McKean (H-M), Box-Pierce (B-P), and Ljung-Box (L-B) tests. These tests were compared with respect to Type I error and power under a wide variety of error models and sample sizes. Although the B-P and L-B tests are portmanteau methods that incorporate information from a large portion of the autocorrelation function, the more focused D-W and H-M first-order autoregressive tests are shown to be considerably more powerful. The popular L-B test has unacceptable Type I error and should not be used in the context of the intervention model applied in this study.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
