Confirmatory factor analysis of responses by 211 preadolescents (M age = 10.25 years,SD = 1.48) with mild intellectual disabilities (MIDs) to the individually administered Self Description Questionnaire I–Individual Administration (SDQI-IA) counters widely cited claims that these children cannot differentiate multiple self-concept factors. Results provide clear support for the a priori eight-factor solution, modest correlations between the factors (Mdn r = .38), substantial reliabilities (Mdn = .90), and invariance of the factor solution over gender, age, and educational placement (regular vs. special, segregated classes). Also introduced is a new hybrid compromise between multigroup and multipleindicator-multiple-cause (MIMIC) approaches to latent mean differences. Consistent with a priori predictions, preadolescents with MIDs have lower self-concepts in segregated classes than in regular classes for three academic self-concept scales (reading, math, and general-school) and, to a lesser extent, peer relationships and global selfesteem, but not for the other three nonacademic components of self-concept (physical, appearance, and parent relationships).
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991).Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (1998).1996 Census of Population and Housing, Australia in profile: A regional analysis. Canberra: Author.
3.
Begley, A. (1999). The self-perception of pupils with Down Syndrome in relation to their academic competence, physical competence and social acceptance.International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 46, 515-529.
4.
Bentler, P. M. (1990).Comparative fit indices in structural models.Psychological Bulletin,107, 238-246.
5.
Bollen, K. A. (1989).Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
6.
Byrne, B. M. (1996).Measuring self-concept across the life span: Issues and instrumentation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
7.
Byrne, B. M. (1998).Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1987). Adolescent self-concept: Testing the assumption of equivalent structure across gender.American Educational Research Journal, 24, 365-385.
9.
Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance.Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456-466.
10.
Chapman, J. W. (1988). Learning disabled children's self-concepts.Review of Educational Research, 58, 347-371.
11.
Coleman, J. (1983). Handicapped labels and instructional segregation: Influences on children's self-concepts versus the perceptions of others.Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 3-11.
12.
Crabtree, J. W. (2003). Maintaining positive self-concept: Social comparisons secondary school student with mild learning disabilities attending mainstream and special schools. In H. W. Marsh, R. G. Craven, & D. McInerney (Eds.),International advances in self research (Vol. 1, pp. 261-290). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
13.
Crain, R. (1996). The influence of age, race, and gender on child and adolescents' multidimensional selfconcept. In B. Bracken (Ed.),Handbook of self-concept: Developmental, social, and clinical considerations (pp. 395-420). New York: John Wiley.
14.
Dunn, L. M. (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded: Is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 34, 5-22.
15.
Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981).Meta-analysisin social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16.
Grayson, D. A., Mackinnon, A., Jorm, A. F., Creasey, H., & Broe, G. A. (2000). Item bias in the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale: Effects of physical disorders and disability in an elderly community sample.Journals of Gerontology Series B—Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 5, 273-282.
17.
Gresham, F., & MacMillan, D. (1997).Social competence and affective characteristics of students with mild disability.Review of Educational Research, 67, 377-415.
18.
Harter, S. (1990). Issues in the assessment of self-concept of children and adolescents. In A. La Greca (Ed.), Through the eyes of the child: Obtaining self-reports from children and adolescents. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
19.
Harter, S., & Pike, R. (1984). The pictorial scale of perceived competence and social acceptance for young children.Child Development, 55, 1969-1982.
20.
Hattie, J. (1992).Self-concept. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
Hau, K. T., & Marsh, H. W. (2004). The use of item parcels in structural equation modelling: Nonnormal data and small sample sizes.British Journalof MathematicalandStatistical Psychology, 57, 327-351.
22.
Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children's selfcompetence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one though twelve.Child Development, 73, 509-527.
23.
Johnson, G. (1950).A study of the social position of the mentally retarded child in the regular grades.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 55, 60-89.
24.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996).LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
25.
Kagen, S. L., Moore, E., & Bredekamp, S. (1995).Considering children's early development and learning: Toward common views and vocabulary (Report No. 95-03). Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel.
26.
Kaplan, D. (2000).Structural equationmodeling:Foundationsandextensions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
Little, T., Widaman, K., Farren, A., MacMillan, A., Hemsley, R., & MacMillan, D. (1990).The factor structure and reliability of the Self Description Questionnaire (SDQII) in an early adolescent population, stratified by academic level, ethnicity and gender. Riverside: University of California, Riverside, School of Education.
28.
Marsh, H. W. (1984). Self-concept: The application of a frame of reference model to explain paradoxical results.Australian Journal of Psychology, 28, 165-181.
29.
Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept.Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 280-295.
30.
Marsh, H. W. (1988).Self Description Questionnaire: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept: A test manual and a research monograph. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
31.
Marsh, H. W. (1989). Age and sex effects in multiple dimensions of self-concept: Preadolescents to early adulthood.Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 417-430.
32.
Marsh, H. W. (1994). Confirmatory factor analysis models of factorial invariance: A multifaceted approach.Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 5-34.
33.
Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size.Psychological Bulletin, 102, 391-410.
34.
Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. (1997). Academic self-concept: Beyond the dustbowl. In G. Phye (Ed.),Handbook of classroom assessment: Learning, achievement, and adjustment (pp. 131-198). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
35.
Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. (2002). The pivotal role of frames of reference in academic self-concept formation: The big fish little pond effect. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.),Adolescence and education (Vol. II, pp. 83-123). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
36.
Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., & Debus, R. L. (1991). Self-concepts of young children aged 5 to 8: Their measurement and multidimensional structure.Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 377-392.
37.
Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., & Debus, R. (1998). Structure, stability, and development of young children's self-concepts: A multicohort-multioccasion study.Child Development, 69, 1030-1053.
38.
Marsh, H. W., Debus, R., & Bornholt, L. (2005). Validating young children's self-concept responses: Methodological ways and means to understand their responses. In D. M. Teti (Ed.),Handbook of research methods in developmental science (pp. 138-160). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
39.
Marsh, H. W., Ellis, L., Parada, L., Richards, G., & Heubeck, B. G. (2005). A short version of the Self Description Questionnaire II: Operationalizing criteria for short-form evaluation with new applications of confirmatory factor analyses.Psychological Assessment, 17, 81-102.
40.
Marsh, H. W., & Grayson, D. (1994). Longitudinal stability of latent means and individual differences: A unified approach.Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 317-359.
41.
Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. T. (2003). Big fish little pond effect on academic self-concept: A cross-cultural (26 country)test of the negative effects of academicallyselective schools.American Psychologist, 58, 1-13.
42.
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Grayson, D. (2005). Goodness of fit evaluation in structural equation modeling. In A. Maydeu-Olivares & J. McCardle (Eds.),Contemporary psychometrics. A festschrift to Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 275-340). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43.
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralising Hu & Bentler's (1999) findings.Structural Equation Modelling, 11, 320-341.
44.
Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). The application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of selfconcept: First and higher order factor structures and their invariance across age groups.Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562-582.
45.
Marsh, H. W., & Johnston, C. (1993).Multidimensionalself-concepts and frames of reference: Relevance to the exceptional learner. In F. Obiakor & S. Stile (Eds.),Self-concept of exceptional learners: Current perspectives for educators (pp. 72-112). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
46.
Marsh, H. W., & O'Neill, R. (1984). Self Description Questionnaire III: The construct validity of multidimensionalself-conceptratings by late adolescents.Journalof EducationalMeasurement, 21, 153-174.
47.
Marsh, H. W., & Parker, J. (1984). Determinants of students'self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don't learn to swim as well?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 213-231.
48.
Marsh, H. W., & Rowe, K. J. (1996). The negative effects of school-average ability on academic self-concept: An application of multilevel modelling.Australian Journal of Education, 40, 65-87.
49.
McDonald, R. (1985).Factor analysis and related methods. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
Renick, M., & Harter, S. (1989). Impact of social comparisons on the developing self-perceptions of learning disabled students.Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 631-638.
51.
Rogers, C., Smith, M., & Coleman, J. (1978). Social comparison in the classroom: The relationship between academic achievement and self-concept.Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 50-57.
52.
Silon, E. L., & Harter, S. (1985). Assessment of perceived competence, motivational orientation, and anxiety in segregated and mainstreamed educable mentally retarded children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 217-230.
53.
Strang, L., Smith, M., & Rogers, C. (1978). Social comparison, multiple reference groups, and the self-concepts of academically handicapped children before and after mainstreaming.Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 487-497.
54.
Thompson, M. S., & Green, S. B. (in press). Evaluating between-group differences in latent variable means. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.),Introduction to structural equation modeling: A second course. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55.
Tracey, D. K. (2002).Self-concepts of preadolescents with mild intellectual disability: Multidimensionality, measurement, and support for the big fish little pond effect. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Western Sydney, Australia. Available from http://self.uws.edu.au/
56.
Vaughn, S., Elbaum, B., & Schumm, J. (1996). The effects of inclusion on the social functioning of students with learning disabilities.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 598-608.
57.
Watt, H. M. G. (2004). Development of adolescents' self-perceptions, values, and task perceptions according to gender and domain in 7th-through 11th-grade Australian students.Child Development, 75, 1556-1574.
58.
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Harold, R. D., Arbreton, A. J. A., Freedman-Doan, C., et al. (1997). Change in children's competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A 3-year study.Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 451-469.
59.
Wylie, R. C. (1989).Measures of self-concept. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
