Cognitive learning style instruments continue to enjoy widespread use in educational and occupational contexts by researchers and practitioners alike, despite widespread questions about the valid measurement of cognitive learning styles. This investigation examines the psychometric properties of one well-known measure of cognitive learning style—the Gregorc Style Delineator (GSD). The GSD was administered to 467 undergraduate and graduate students (49% female) from two major colleges in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States. Using confirmatory and exploratory factor-analytic techniques, Gregorc’s channel theory was investigated as deployed and represented by the instrument. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients, ranging from .54 to .68, were appreciably lower than those reported by the instrument’s developer. The data disconfirmed both the two- and four-factor confirmatory models. In the post hoc exploratory factor analyses, many of the factor pattern/structure coefficients were ambiguously associated with two or more of the four theoretical channels as well. Overall, there was little support for the GSD’s theoretical basis or design and the concomitant accurate portrayal of one’s cognitive learning style.
Beck, C. R. (2001). Matching teaching strategies to learning style preferences. The Teacher Educator, 37, 1-15.
2.
Bentler, P. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.
3.
Benton, S. L. (1995). Gregorc Style Delineator. In J. Conoley & J. Impara (Eds.), The twelfth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 425-428). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
4.
Bonham, L. (1987). Theoretical and practical differences and similarities among selected cognitive and learning styles of adults: An analysis of the literature. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Department of Adult Education, University of Georgia, Athens.
5.
Bonham, L. (1988). Learning style instruments: Let the buyer beware. Lifelong Learning, 11, 12-16.
6.
Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
7.
Curry, L. (1983, April). An organization of learning styles theory and constructs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
8.
D’Amato, R. (1992). The Hermann brain dominance instrument. In J. Kramer & J. Conoley (Eds.), The eleventh mental measurements yearbook (pp. 377-378). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
9.
De Bello, T. C. (1990). Comparison of eleven major learning styles models: Variables, appropriate populations, validity of instrumentation, and the research behind them. Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 6, 203-222.
10.
Drysdale, M. T. B., Ross, J. L., & Schulz, R. A. (2001). Cognitive learning styles and academic performance in 19 first-year university courses: Successful students versus students at risk. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 6, 271-289.
11.
Duff, A., & Duffy, T. (2002). Psychometric properties of Honey & Mumford’s Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ). Personality & Individual Differences, 33, 147-163.
12.
Gentry, J. A., & Hegelson, M. G. (1999). Using learning style information to improve the core financial management course. Financial Management & Education, 9, 59-69.
13.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Gregg, N. (1989). Learning-style inventory. In J. Conoley & J. Kramer (Eds.), The tenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 441-442). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Gregorc, A. (1982a). An adult’s guide to style. Columbia, CT: Gregorc Associates, Inc.
17.
Gregorc, A. (1982b). Gregorc Style Delineator. Columbia, CT: Gregorc Associates, Inc.
18.
Gregorc, A. (1982c). Gregorc Style Delineator: Development, technical, and administrative manual. Columbia, CT: Gregorc Associates, Inc.
19.
Gregorc, A. F. (1984). Style as a symptom: A phenomenonological perspective. Theory Into Practice, 23, 51-55.
20.
Harvey, B., Pallant, J., & Harvey, D. (2004). An evaluation of the factor structure of the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 1007-1018.
21.
Henson, R. K. (2001). Understanding internal consistency reliability estimates: A conceptual primer on coefficient alpha. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 177-189.
22.
Henson, R. K., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2004). Reporting practice and use of exploratory factor analysis in educational research journals: Errors and explanation. Research in the Schools, 11, 61-72.
23.
Henson, R. K., & Hwang, D. (2002). Variability and prediction of measurement error in Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory scores: A reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 712-727.
24.
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
25.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis’ conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equations Modeling, 6, 1-55.
26.
Joniak, A., & Isakson, S. (1988). The Gregorc Style Delineator: Internal consistency and its relationship to Kirton’s adaptive-innovative distinction. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 1043-1049.
27.
Joughin, G. (1992). Cognitive style and adult learning principles. International Journal of Lifelong Learning, 11, 3-14.
28.
Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 323-334.
29.
Keeling, K. B. (2000). A regression equation for determining the dimensionality of data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 457-468.
30.
Kline, P. (1993). The handbook of psychological testing. London: Routledge.
31.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
32.
Knowles, M., Holton, E., & Swanson, R. (1998). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (5th ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
33.
Loo, R. (1999). Confirmatory factor analyses of Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory (LSI-1985). British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 213-219.
34.
Merriam, S. B., & Caffarella, R. S. (Eds.). (1991). Learning in adulthood. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35.
Merriam, S. B., & Caffarella, R. S. (Eds.). (1999). Learning in adulthood (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36.
Messick, S. (2001). In J. M. Collis & S. Messick (Eds.), Intelligence and personality: Bridging the gap in theory and measurement (pp. 259-272). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
38.
O’Brien, T. (1990). Construct validation of the Gregorc Style Delineator: An application of LISREL7. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 631-636.
39.
O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velciner’s MAP test. Behavior, Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 396-402.
40.
Ross, J. L., Drysdale, M. T., & Schulz, R. A. (2001). Cognitive learning styles and academic performance in two postsecondary computer application courses. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 400-412.
41.
Sadler-Smith, E. (2001). The relationship between learning style and cognitive style. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 609-616.
42.
Snow, R. E., Corno, L., & Jackson, D. (1996). Individual differences in affective and cognitive functions. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 243-310). New York: Macmillan.
43.
Stahl, S. A. (2002). Different strokes for different folks? In L. Abbeduto (Ed.), Taking sides: Clashing on controversial issues in educational psychology (pp. 98-107). Guilford, CT: McGraw-Hill/Duskin.
44.
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1997). Are cognitive styles still in style?American Psychologist, 52, 700-712.
45.
Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Northridge, CA: HarpersCollins.
46.
Thompson, B., & Daniel, L. G. (1996). Factor analytic evidence for the constant validity of scores: A historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 197-208.
47.
Woolfolk, A. E. (2004). Educational psychology (9th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
48.
Yin, P., & Fan, X. (2003). Assessing the factor structure invariance of self-concept measurement across ethnic and gender groups: Findings from a national sample. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 296-318.
