Two competing structural models for the revised Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) were examined. The test developers promote a model related to three uncorrelated components of strategic learning: skill, will, and self-regulation. Other investigators have shown empirical support for a three-factor correlated model characterized by effort-related activities, goal orientation, and cognitive activities (ER-GO-CA). Neither model has been verified on scores from the second edition of the LASSI. In the present sample of 297 college students, confirmatory factor analysis of the subscale scores provided support for the ER-GO-CA model.
Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 78-117.
2.
Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness of fit indices. Sociological Methods & Research, 11, 325-344.
3.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
4.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8.51 [Computer software]. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software International.
5.
Ley, K. L., & Young, D. B. (1998). Motivation in developmental and regular admission college students. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 14, 29-38.
6.
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Melancon, J. G. (2002). Reliability, structure, and correlates of learning and study strategies inventory scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 1020-1027.
8.
Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (1998). Using the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory-High School version with Singaporean females: Examining psychometric properties. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 493-511.
9.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
10.
Olaussen, B. S., & Braten, I. (1998). Identifying latent variables measured by the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory(LASSI) in Norwegian college students. Journal of Experimental Education, 67, 82-96.
11.
Olejnik, S., & Nist, S. L. (1992). Identifying latent variables measured by the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI). Journal of Experimental Education, 62, 151-159.
12.
Olivarez, A., & Tallent-Runnels, M. K. (1994). Psychometric properties of the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory-High School version. Journal of Experimental Education, 62, 243-257.
13.
Samuelstuen, M. S. (2003). Psychometric properties and item-keying direction effects for the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory-High School version with Norwegian students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 430-445.
14.
Tate, R. (1998). An introduction to modeling outcomes in the behavioral and social sciences (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Burgess International Group.
15.
Weinstein, C. E., & Palmer, D. R. (2002). Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI): User’s manual (2nd ed.). Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing.
16.
Weinstein, C. E., Schulte, A. C., & Palmer, D. P. (1987). Learning and Study Strategies Inventory. Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing.
17.
Yip, M. C., & Chung, O. L. (2002). Relation of study strategies to the academic performance of Hong Kong University students. Psychological Reports, 90, 338-340.
