The Cross-Cultural Adaptability Inventory (CCAI) was developed as a tool to assess an individual's effectiveness in cross-cultural interaction and communication. Because limited validity evidence had been published regarding the CCAI, the purpose of the current study is to evaluate the psychometric properties of CCAI scores, specifically focusing on the replicability of the proposed four-factor structure. This study is based on responses from a sample of 709, primarily Caucasian, college sophomores at a mid-Atlantic university. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated poor fit of the four-factor structure and follow-up exploratory factor analyses failed to reveal an interpretable structure. Possible explanations of poor fit are discussed, and recommendations for further research are suggested.
Benson, J. (1998). Developing a strong program of construct validation: A test anxiety example. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice,17, 10-17.
2.
Benson, J., & Nasser, F. (1998).On the use of factor analysis as a research tool. Journal of Vocational Education Research,23, 13-33.
3.
Bentler, P. M., & Yuan, K. (2000). On adding a mean structure to a covariance structure model. Educational and Psychological Measurement,60, 326-339.
4.
Connolly, I., Darby, M., Tolle-Watts, L., & Thomson-Lakey, E. (2000). The cultural adaptability of health sciences faculty. Journal of Dental Hygiene,74, 102-109.
5.
Cornett-DeVito, M., & McGlone, E. (2000). Multicultural communication training for law enforcement officers: A case study. Criminal Justice Policy Review,11, 234-253.
6.
Erwin, T. D., & Coleman, P. K. (1998). The influence of intercultural experiences and second language proficiency on college students’ cross-cultural adaptability. International Education Journal,28, 5-25.
7.
Fan, X., & Thompson, B. (2001). Confidence intervals about score reliability coefficients, please: An EPM guidelines editorial.Educational and Psychological Measurement,61, 517-531.
8.
Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes.Structural Equation Modeling,6, 56-83.
9.
Fukasawa, L. (1990). The effect of multicultural counseling training on multicultural sensitivity of graduate students (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana State University, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 05A-05A.
10.
Gelles, R. (1996). Expatriate adjustment and performance, and spouse adjustment (Doctoral dissertation, United States International University, 1996).Dissertation Abstracts International, 57,2-2.
11.
Graham, J., Guthrie, A., & Thompson, B. (2003). Consequences of not interpreting structure coefficients in published CFA research: A reminder.Structural Equation Modeling,10, 142-153.
12.
Goldstein, D., & Smith, D. (1999). The analysis of the effects of experiential training on sojourners’crosscultural adaptability.International Journal of Intercultural Relations,23, 157-173.
13.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification.Psychological Methods,3, 424-453.
15.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling,6, 1-55.
16.
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
17.
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1996). PRELIS 2: User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
18.
Kelley, C., & Meyers, J. (1995a). The Cross-Cultural Adaptability Inventory. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
19.
Kelley, C., & Meyers, J. (1995b). The Cross-Cultural Adaptability Inventory manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
20.
Kitsantas, A., & Meyers, J. (2001, March). Studying abroad: Does it enhance college student crosscultural awareness? Paper presented at the combined annual meeting of the San Diego State University and the U.S. Department of Education Centers for International Business Education and Research, San Diego, CA.
21.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
22.
Lui, G. (1999). Personal characteristics associated with the Cross-Cultural Adaptability Inventory for Hong Kong Chinese missionaries (Doctoral dissertation, Fuller Theological Seminary, 1999).Dissertation Abstracts International,60,4-4.
23.
Majumdar, B., Keystone, J., & Cuttress, L. (1999).Cultural sensitivity training among foreign medical graduates.Medical Education,33, 177-184.
24.
Montagliani, A., & Giacalone, R. (1998). Impression management in cross-cultural adaptation.Journal of Social Psychology,138, 598-608.
25.
Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
26.
Olsson, U. H., Foss, T., Troye, S. V., & Howell, R. D. (2000). The performance of ML, GLS, & WLS estimation in structural equation modeling under conditions of misspecification and nonnormality.Structural Equation Modeling,7, 557-595.
27.
Olsson, U. H., Troye, S. V., & Howell, R. D. (1999).Theoretic fit and empirical fit: The performanceof maximum likelihood versus generalized least squares estimation in structural equation modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research,34, 31-58.
28.
Remmert, A. (1993). The impact of multicultural in-service education on the cross-cultural adaptability of public school teachers (Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, 1995).Dissertation Abstracts International,54, 12A-12A.
29.
Thompson, B. (1997). The importance of structure coefficients in structural equation modeling confirmatory factor analysis.Educational and Psychological Measurement,57, 5-19.
30.
Thompson,B., & Daniel, L. G. (1996).Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of scores: A historical overview and some guidelines.Educational and Psychological Measurement,56, 197-208.
