For a number of years, the dominant approach to measuring individual differences in how people respond to interpersonal conflict has been the dual-concerns model, which assesses five broad conflict styles said to result from one’s standing on two underlying dimensions: concern for self and concern for other. This article describes the development of a new instrument, the Conflict Dynamics Profile, that takes a different, explicitly behavioral approach to measuring responses to conflict. The Conflict Dynamics Profile assesses 15 specific behavioral responses to provocation in one’s life. Some of these responses are constructive, and some are destructive; some are active, and some are relatively passive. Four studies are reported that establish the psychometric adequacy of the instrument, including evidence for internal reliability, test-retest reliability, freedom from social desirability contamination, correlation with related constructs, and agreement between self-ratings and ratings by observers. Implications of these findings and the potential usefulness of the new instrument are discussed.
Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123-148.
2.
Amason, A. C., & Schweiger, D. M. (1994). Resolving the paradox of conflict, strategic decision making and organizational performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 239-253.
3.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
4.
Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
5.
Berry, D. S., & Willingham, J. K. (1997). Affective traits, responses to conflict, and satisfaction in romantic relationships. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 564-576.
6.
Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The managerial grid. Houston, TX: Gulf.
7.
Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1970). The fifth achievement. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 6, 413-426.
8.
Burton, J. W. (1990). Conflict: Resolution and prevention. New York: St. Martin’s.
9.
Capobianco, S., Davis, M. H., & Kraus, L. A. (2000). Conflict Dynamics Profile technical guide. St. Petersburg, FL: Management Development Institute.
10.
Carnegie, D. (1981). How to win friends and influence people (Rev. ed.). New York: Pocket Books.
11.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
13.
Cole, D. A. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 584-594.
14.
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Coombs, C. H. (1987). The structure of conflict. American Psychologist, 42, 355-363.
16.
Donaldson, M. C., & Donaldson, M. (1996). Negotiating for dummies. Foster City, CA: IDG Books.
17.
Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18.
Feeney, M. C., & Davidson, J. A. (1996). Bridging the gap between the practical and the theoretical: An evaluation of a conflict resolution model. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 2, 255-269.
19.
Fincham, F. D., & Osborne, L. N. (1993). Marital conflict and children: Retrospect and prospect. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 75-88.
20.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1974). Attitudes toward objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychological Review, 81, 59-74.
21.
Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York: Penguin.
22.
Glaser, R., & Glaser, C. (1996). Negotiating style profile (Rev. ed.). King of Prussia, PA: Organization Design and Development.
23.
Gottman, J., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 221-233.
24.
Gottman, J., with Silver, N. (1994). Why marriages succeed or fail... and how you can make yours last. New York: Fireside.
25.
Jörskog, K. G., & Sörbom, G. (1988). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: SPSS.
26.
Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum.
27.
Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.
28.
Munduate, L., Ganaza, J., Peiro, J. M., & Euwema, M. C. (1999). Patterns of styles in conflict management and effectiveness. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10, 5-24.
29.
Paulhus, D. L. (1988). Assessing self deception and impression management in self-reports: The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Vancouver, Canada: Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia.
30.
Rahim, M. A. (1983). Rahim organizational conflict inventories. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
31.
Rusbult, C., Verette, J., Whitney, G. A., Slovik, L. F., & Lipkus, I. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53-78.
32.
Sessa, V. I. (1996). Using perspective taking to manage conflict and affect in teams. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32, 101-115.
33.
Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. (1974). Thomas-Kilmann conflict MODE instrument. New York: Xicom.
34.
Van de Vliert, E. (1997). Complex interpersonal conflict behaviour: Theoretical frontiers. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
35.
Van de Vliert, E., Euwema, M. C., & Huismans, S. E. (1995). Managing conflict with a subordinate or a superior: Effectiveness of conglomerated behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 271-281.
