The Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test (UNIT) is an individually administered, nonverbal intelligence test designed for use with non-English-speaking, limited English proficient, or deaf children. The aim of this study was to assess the factor structure invariance of the UNIT across deaf and standardization samples through the use of multisample confirmatory factor an alysis. Two theoretical models were evaluated: a primary two-factor (Memory and Reasoning) model and a secondary two-factor (Symbolic and Nonsymbolic) model. The general forms of both models were invariant across groups, thus supporting both theoretical models. For the primary model, partial measurement invariance was found. A follow-up analysis found that the analogic reasoning measurement intercept was not invariant, indicating that the expected subtest scores for deaf examinees were lower than those for examinees in the standardization sample. In addition, the standardization sample had a higher Memory latent factor mean than the deaf sample did. The secondary model was not invariant, with three pattern coefficients differing across groups.
Aiken, L. S., Stein, J. A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Structural equation analyses of clinical subpopulation differences and comparative treatment outcomes: Characterizing the daily lives of drug addicts. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 488-499.
2.
Alwin, D. F., & Jackson, D. J. (1981). Applications of simultaneous factor analysis to issues of factorial invariance. In D. Jackson& E. Borgatta (Eds.), Factor analysis and measurement in sociological research: A multi-dimensional perspective (pp. 249-279). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association,& National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
5.
Bentler, P. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology in the bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 400-404.
6.
Blair, F. X. (1957). A study of the visual memory of deaf and hearing children. American Annals of the Deaf, 102, 254-263.
7.
Blennerhasset, L. D., Moores, D. F.,& Anderson, B. (1988, April). Factor analysis of the WAISR for two groups of deaf adolescents. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, Chicago.
8.
Boomsma, K. A. (1982). The robustness of LISREL against small sample size in factor analysis models. In K. G. Jöreskog& H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction (Part I, pp. 149-173). Amsterdam: North Holland.
9.
Bracken, B. A., & McCallum, S. (1998). Universal nonverbal intelligence test. Chicago: Riverside.
10.
Braden, J. P. (1984). The factorial similarity of the WISC-R Performance scale in deaf and hearing children. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 405-409.
11.
Braden, J. P. (1994). Deafness, deprivation, and IQ. New York: Plenum.
12.
Braden, J. P., Kostrubala, C.,& Reed, J. (1994). Why do deaf children score differently on performance v. motor-reduced nonverbal intelligence tests?Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 12, 357-363.
13.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
14.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equations models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H. (1992). Visual short-term memory of deaf children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 12, 93-105.
16.
Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 3, 456-466.
18.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Cole, D. A., Maxwell, S. E., Arvey, R., & Salas, E. (1993). Multivariate group comparisons of variable systems: MANOVA and structural equation modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 174-184.
20.
Conrad, R. (1979). The deaf school child: Language and cognition. London: Harper & Row.
21.
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt.
22.
Gibbins, S. (1989). The provision of school psychological assessment services for the hearing impaired: A national survey. Volta Review, 91, 95-103.
23.
Glucksberg, S.,& Krauss, R. M. (1967). What do people say after they have learned howto talk? Studies of the development of referential communication. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 13, 309-316.
24.
Goetzinger, C. P.,& Huber, T. G. (1964). Astudy of immediate and delayed visual retention with deaf and hearing adolescents. American Annals of the Deaf, 109, 297-305.
25.
Hancock, G. R. (1997). Structural equation modeling methods of hypothesis testing of latent variable means. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30, 91-105.
26.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL8: User’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
27.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2002). LISREL (version 8.53) [Computer software]. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
28.
Keith, T. Z. (1997). Using confirmatory factor analysis to aid in understanding the constructs measured by intelligence tests. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 373-403). New York: Guilford.
29.
Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, 53-76.
30.
Maller, S. J. (1991, August). Cognitive assessment of deaf children: Current issues and future trends. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.
31.
Maller, S. J. (1996). WISC-III verbal item invariance across samples of deaf and hearing children of similar measured ability. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 14, 152-165.
32.
Maller, S. J. (1997). Deafness and WISC-III item difficulty: Invariance and fit. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 299-314.
33.
Maller, S. J. (2000). Item invariance in four subtests of the Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test across groups of deaf and hearing children. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 18, 240-254.
34.
Maller, S. J.,& Braden, J. P. (1993). The construct and criterion-related validity of the WISC-III with deaf adolescents [WISC-III monograph]. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 105-113.
35.
Maller, S. J., & Ferron, J. (1997). WISC-III factor invariance across deaf and standardization samples. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 987-994.
36.
Maller, S. J., Konold, T. R.,& Glutting, J. J. (1998). WISC-III factor invariance across samples of children exhibiting appropriate and inappropriate test-session behaviors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 467-474.
37.
Marschark, M. (1993). Psychological development of deaf children. New York: Oxford University Press.
38.
Marschark, M. (2003). Cognitive functioning in deaf adults and children. In M. Marschark & P. E. Spencer (Eds.), Deaf studies, language, and education (pp. 464-489). New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
Marschark, M., & Mayer, T. (1998). Mental representation and memory in deaf adults and children. In M. Marschark& M. D. Clark (Eds.), Psychological perspectives in deafness (Vol. 2, pp. 53-77). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
Marsh, H. W., & Grayson, D. (1990). Public/Catholic differences in the high school and beyond data: A multigroup structural modeling approach to testing mean differences. Journal of Educational Statistics, 15, 199-235.
41.
McGaw, B., & Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Factorial invariance of ability measures in groups differing in intelligence and socio-economic status. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 24, 154-168.
42.
McGuire, A. (2003). Re: [NASP-IG-SchPsyDeaf] digest number 537. Message posted to NASP-IG-SchPsyDeaf@yahoogroups.com
43.
Mykelbust, H. R. (1964). The psychology of deafness: Sensory deprivation, learning, and adjustment (2nd ed.). New York: Grune & Stratton.
44.
Paul, P. V.,& Jackson, D. W. (1993). Toward a psychology of deafness. Boston: Allyn& Bacon.
45.
Pintner, R.,& Patterson, D. (1917). Acomparison of deaf and hearing children in visual memory for digits. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2, 76-88.
46.
Reynolds, C. R. (1982). The problem of bias in psychological assessment. In C. R. Reynolds & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (pp. 178-201). New York: John Wiley.
47.
Rigdon, E. E. (1996). CFI versus RMSEA: A comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 369-379.
48.
Santa-Teresa, R. (2003). Re: [NASP-IG-SchPsyDeaf] Re: UNIT discussion. Message posted to NASP-IG-SchPsyDeaf@yahoogroups.com
49.
Schafer, L. J.,& Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our viewof the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147-177.
50.
Shelley-Sireci, L. M. & Sireci, S. G. (1998, August). Controlling for uncontrolled variables in cross-cultural research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.
51.
Sireci, S. G., Bastari, B., & Allalouf, A. (1998, August). Evaluating construct equivalence across adapted tests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco.
52.
Sullivan, P. M.,& Montoya, L. A. (1997). Factor analysis of the WISC-III with deaf and hard-ofhearing children. Psychological Assessment, 9, 317-321.
53.
Sullivan, P. M., & Schulte, L. E. (1992). Factor analysis of the WISC-R with deaf and hard-ofhearing children. Psychological Assessment, 4, 537-540.
54.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1995). Statistical abstract of the United States: 1995. Washington, DC: Author.
55.
U.S. Department of Education National Center for Education Statistics. (1996). Digest of education statistics [NCES 96-133]. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
56.
Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. L. (1998). Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods, 3, 231-251.
57.
Wallace, G., & Corballis, M. C. (1973). Short-term memory and coding strategies in the deaf. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99, 334-348.
58.
Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–third edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
59.
Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989/1990). Woodcock– Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery–Revised. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
