This study investigated the degree of factor structure invariance of self-concept measurement across ethnic and gender groups. The National Educational Longitudinal Survey of 1988 (NELS: 88) data were used for the investigation. The factor pattern coefficients and factor variances/covariances were found to be statistically not invariant across either ethnic or gender groups. The concern about the effect of the large sample size on the statistical significance test results led to the authors’ examination of descriptive model fit indices that suggested that it would be reasonable to consider the factor pattern coefficients and factor variances and covariances as invariant across ethnic and gender groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
2.
Bentler, P.M., & Yuan, K.-H. (2000). On adding a mean structure to a covariance structure model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 326-339.
3.
Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1991). Measures of self-esteem. In J.P. Robinson, P.R. Shaver, & L.S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 115-160). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4.
Burden, R.L. (1994). Trends and developments in educational psychology: An international perspective. School Psychology International, 15, 293-347.
5.
Byrne, B.M. (1984). The general/academic self-concept nomological network: A review of construct validation research. Review of Educational Research, 54, 427-456.
6.
Byrne, B.M. (1986). Self-concept/academic achievement relations: An investigation of dimensionality, stability, and causality. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 18, 173-186.
7.
Byrne, B.M. (1996). Measuring self-concept across the life span: Issues and instrumentation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8.
Byrne, B.M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Byrne, B.M., & Shavelson, R.J. (1986). On the structure of adolescent self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 474-481.
10.
Byrne, B.M., Shavelson, R.J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for equivalence of factor covariance and mean structure: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456-466.
11.
Cooley, C.H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner.
12.
Fan, X., & Thompson, B. (2001). Confidence intervals about score reliability coefficients, please: An EPM guidelines editorial. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 517-531.
13.
Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). The effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on SEM fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 56-83.
14.
Fan, X., & Wang, L. (1998). Effects of potential confounding factors on fit indices and parameter estimates for true and misspecified SEM models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 699-733.
15.
Fan, X., Willson, V.L., & Kapes, J.T. (1996). Ethnic group’s representation in test construction samples and test bias: The standardization fallacy revisited. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 365-381.
16.
Graham, J.M., Guthrie, A.C., & Thompson, B. (in press). Consequences of not interpreting structure coefficients in published CFA research: A reminder. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal.
17.
Hattie, J. (1992). Self-concept. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Heaton, R.C., & Duerfeldt, P.H. (1973). The relationship between self-esteem, self-reinforcement, and the internal-external personality dimensions. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 123, 3-13.
19.
Horn, J.L., & McArdle, J.J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18(3-4), 117-144.
20.
James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.
21.
Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications (2nd ed.). Chicago: SPSS.
22.
Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: User’s reference. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
23.
Kanoy, R.C., III., Wester, J., & Latta, M. (1989). Predicting college success of freshmen using traditional, cognitive, and psychological measures. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 22, 65-70.
24.
Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299-337.
25.
Marsh, H.W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 129-149.
26.
Marsh, H.W. (1990). Influences of internal and external frames of reference on the formation of math and English self-concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 107-116.
27.
Marsh, H.W. (1992). Self Description Questionnaire (SDQ) II: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of late adolescent self-concept—An interim test manual and research monograph. Macarthur, New South Wales, Australia: University of Western Sydney, Faculty of Education.
28.
Marsh, H.W. (1993a). Academic self-concept: Theory, measurement, and research. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 4, pp. 59-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Marsh, H.W. (1993b). Multidimensional structure of academic self-concept: Invariance over gender and age. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 841-860.
30.
Marsh, H.W. (1994a). Confirmatory factor analysis models of factorial invariance: A multifaceted approach. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1(1), 5-34.
31.
Marsh, H.W. (1994b). The importance of being important: Theoretical models and relations between specific and global components of physical self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 306-325.
32.
Marsh, H.W. (1994c). Using the National Longitudinal Study of 1988 to evaluate theoretical models of self-concept: The self-description questionnaire. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 439-456.
33.
Marsh, H.W., Byrne, B.M., & Shavelson, R.J. (1988). A multi-faceted academic self-concept: Its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 366-380.
34.
Marsh, H.W., & Hattie, J. (1996). Theoretical perspectives on the structure of self-concept. In B.A. Braken (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept: Developmental, social, and clinical considerations. New York: John Wiley.
35.
Marsh, H.W., & Smith, I.D. (1982). Multitrait-multimethod analyses of two self-concept instruments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 430-440.
36.
Marx, R.W., & Winne, P.H. (1980). Self-concept validation research: Some current complexities. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 13, 72-82.
37.
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R.L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.). New York: American Council on Education & Macmillan.
38.
National Center for Education Statistics. (1994). A guide to using NELS: 88 data. Washington DC: Author.
39.
Pedhazur, E.J., & Schmelkin, L.P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
Reynolds, C.R., & Brown, R.T. (Eds.). Perspectives on bias in mental testing. New York: Plenum.
41.
Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.
42.
Shavelson, R.J., Bolus, R., & Keesling, J.W. (1980). Self-concept: recent developments in theory and methods. New Directions for Testing and Measurement, 7, 25-43.
43.
Shavelson, R.J., Hubner, J.J., & Stanton, G.C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407-441.
44.
Soares, L.M., & Soares, A.T. (1982, March). Convergent and discrimination validation of self-perceptions. Paper presented at the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 201 646)
45.
Soares, L.M., & Soares, A.T. (1983, April). Components of students’ self-related cognitions. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 228 317)
46.
Song, I.S., & Hattie, J.A. (1984). Home environment, self-concept, and academic achievement: A causal modeling approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1269-1281.
47.
Steiger, J.H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.
48.
Steiger, J.H., & Lind, J.C. (1980, May). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
49.
Thompson, B. (1997). The importance of structure coefficients in structural equation modeling confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 5-19.
50.
Van Boxtel, H.V., & Monks, F.J. (1992). General, social, and academic self-concepts of gifted adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 169-186.
51.
Wylie, R.C. (1989). Measures of self-concept. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
52.
Zirkel, P.A. (1971). Self-concept and the “disadvantage” of ethnic group membership and mixture. Review of Educational Research, 41, 211-225.
