The current study investigated the psychometric properties of the Interaction with Disabled Persons Scale (IDP). An exploratory factor analysis (N=358) found three factors underlying attitudes toward individuals with disabilities as measured by the IDP. These factors were labeled social discomfort, empathy, and fear of having the disability. The estimates of reliability were acceptable for the three factors. The putative factor struoture was recovered in a confirmatory factor analysis conducted on a second, independent sample (N=272). The three factors were related in appropriate directions with other measures of attitudes toward individuals with disabilities, self-esteem, amount of prior contact, experience with, and the closeness of relationships with individuals with disabilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Antonak, R.F. (1980). A hierarchy of attitudes towards exceptionality. Journal of Special Education, 14, 231-241.
2.
Antonak, R. F., & Livneh, H. (1988). The measurement of attitudes toward people with disabilities: methods, psychometrics, and scales. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
3.
Arbuckle, J. L. (1997). AMOS users' guide (Version 3.6). Chicago: SmallWaters Corporation.
4.
Berry, J. O. (1992). Preparing college students to work with children and families with special needs. Family Relations: Journal of Applied Family and Child Studies, 41, 44-48.
5.
Block, J. R. (1974). Recent research with the Attitude Toward Disabled Persons scale: Some research abstracts (Rehabilitation Series No. 7). Albertson, NY: Human Resources Center.
6.
Bollen, K. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
7.
Cannon, B. J., & Szuhay, J. A. (1986). Faking can elevate scores on the Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons scale. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 30, 120-123.
8.
Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco: Freeman.
9.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354.
10.
Elliott, T. R., & Byrd, E. K. (1983). Attitude change toward disability through television portrayal. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 14, 35-37.
11.
Fischer, D. G., & Fick, C. (1993). Measuring social desirability: Short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 417-424.
12.
Gething, L. (1991). Interaction with Disabled Persons scale: Manual and kit. Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney.
13.
Gething, L. (1994). The Interaction with Disabled Persons scale. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 23-42.
14.
Hagler, P., Vargo, J., & Semple, J. (1987). The potential for faking on the Attitude Toward Disabled Persons scale. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 31, 72-76.
15.
Harasymiw, S. J., Horne, M. D., & Lewis, S. C. (1976). A longitudinal study of disability group acceptance. Rehabilitation Literature, 37, 98-102.
16.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
17.
Kutner, B. (1971). The social psychology of disability. In W. S. Neff (Ed.), Rehabilitation psychology (pp. 143-167). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18.
Lautenschlager, G. J. (1989). A comparison of alternatives to conducting Monte Carlo analyses for determining parallel analysis criteria. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 365-395.
19.
Leonard, R., & Crawford, J. (1989). Two approaches to seeing people with disabilities. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 24, 112-125.
20.
Satcher, J., & Hendren, G. R. (1991). Acceptance of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 by persons preparing to enter the business field. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 22, 15-18.
21.
Siller, J., Ferguson, L. T., Vann, D. H., & Holland, B. (1967). Structure of attitudes toward the physically disabled: The disability factor scales—amputation, blindness, cosmetic conditions. New York: New York University School of Education.
22.
Simpkins, K. L., & Kaplan, R. K. (1991). Fair play for disabled persons: Our responsibilities under the new ADA. Journal of Career Planning and Employment, 51, 40-46.
23.
Speakman, H. G. B., & Kung, J. S. (1980). The relationship between social desirability and attitudes towards disabled persons in physiotherapy students. Journal of Pakistan Physiotherapy Society, 7, 6-11.
24.
Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1972). Short, homogenous versions of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191-193.
25.
Thomas, A. (2000). Stability of Tringo's hierarchy of preference toward disability groups: 30 years later. Psychological Reports, 86, 1155-1156.
26.
Thomas, A. (2001). The multidimensional character of biased perceptions of individuals with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 67, 3-9.
27.
Thornburgh, R. (1991). The Americans with Disabilities Act: What it means to all Americans. Journal of Intergroup Relations, 17, 35-41.
28.
Vargo, J. W., & Semple, J. E. (1984). Honest versus fake scores on the Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons scale-Form A. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 27, 182-185.
29.
Vargo, J. W., Vargo, F. A., & Semple, J. E. (1981). The influence of disability simulation on the attitudes of physical therapy students toward disabled persons. New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy, 9, 22-25.
30.
Yuker, H. E. (1986). The Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons scale: Susceptibility to faking. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 29, 200-204.
31.
Yuker, H. E., & Block, J. R. (1986). Research with the Attitude Toward Disabled Persons Scales (ATDP): 1960-1985. Hempstead, NY: Center for the Study of Attitudes Toward Persons with Disabilities, Hofstra University.
32.
Yuker, H. E., Block, J. R., & Younng, J. H. (1966). The measurement of attitudes towards disabled persons (Human Resources Study No. 3). Albertson, NY: Human Resources Center.
33.
Yuker, H. E., Block, J. R., & Younng, J. H. (1970). The measurement of Attitudes Towards Disabled Persons scale. Albertson, NY: Ina Mend Institution.
