The purpose of this study was to design a psychometrically sound instrument to measure adolescents' attitudes toward school, attitudes toward teachers, goal-valuation, motivation, and general academic self-perceptions that could be used to explore the underachievement of academically able secondary school students. The final School Attitude Assessment Survey-Revised (SAAS-R) instrument consisted of 35 questions, each of which being an indicator of one of the five factors. The final model exhibited reasonable fit, X2(550) = 1,581.7, Comparative Fit Index = .91, Tucker Lewis Index = .92, root mean square error of approximation = .059, standardized root mean squared residual = .057. The scores in this study showed internal consistency reliability coefficient of at least .85 on each of the five factors. In addition, four of the five factors of the SAAS-R appear to differentiate gifted achievers from gifted underachievers. It is the authors' hope that the SAAS-R will allow researchers to more fully understand the relationship between these five factors and underachievement in gifted and nongifted populations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ames, C. A. (1990). Motivation: What teachers need to know. Teachers College Record, 91, 409-421.
2.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
3.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
Bentler, P., & Wu, E. J. C. (1995). EQS 5 user's guide. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
5.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equation modeling with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
6.
Borkowski, J. G., & Thorpe, P. K. (1994). Self-regulation and motivation: A life-span perspective on underachievement. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 45-73). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Bruns, J. H. (1992). They can but they don't. New York: Viking Penguin.
8.
Byrne, B. M. (1996). Measuring self-concept across the lifespan: Issues and instrumentation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
9.
Colangelo, N., Kerr, B., Christensen, P., & Maxey, J. (1993). A comparison of gifted underachievers and gifted high achievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 155-160.
10.
Diaz, E. I. (1998). Perceived factors influencing the academic underachievement of talented students of Puerto Rican descent. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 105-122.
11.
Dowdall, C. B., & Colangelo, N. (1982). Underachieving gifted students: Review and implications. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 179-184.
12.
Emerick, L. J. (1992). Academic underachievement among the gifted: Students' perceptions of factors that reverse the pattern. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 140-146.
13.
Ford, D. Y. (1996). Determinants of underachievement as perceived by gifted, above average, and average Black students. Roeper Review, 14, 130-136.
14.
Frankel, E. (1965). A comparative study of achieving and underachieveing boys of high intellectual ability. In M. Kornrich (Ed.), Underachievement (pp. 87-101). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
15.
Hattie, J. (1992). Self-concept. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70, 151-179.
17.
Holland, V. (1998). Underachieving boys: Problems and solutions. Support for Learning, 13(4), 174-178.
18.
Lyon, M. A. (1993). Academic self-concept and its relationship to achievement in a sample of junior high school students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 201-211.
19.
Majoribanks, K. (1992). The predictive validity of an attitudes towards school scale in relation to children's academic achievement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 945-949.
20.
Mandel, H. P., & Marcus, S. I. (1988). The psychology of underachievement. New York: John Wiley.
21.
Marsh, H. W., Chessor, D., Craven, R., & Roche, L. (1995). The effects of gifted and talented programs on academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 285-319.
22.
McCall, R. B., Evahn, C., & Kratzer, L. (1992). High school underachievers: What do they achieve as adults? Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
McCoach, D. B. (2002). A validation study of the School Attitude Assessment Survey. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 35, 66-77.
24.
McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (in press). Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high achieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly.
25.
Peters, W. A. M., Grager-Loidl, H., & Supplee, P. (2000). Underachievement in gifted and talented students: Theory and practice. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 609-620). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
26.
Peterson, J. S. (2000). A follow-up study of one group of achievers and underachievers four years after high school graduation. Roeper Review, 22, 217-224.
27.
Peterson, J. S., & Colangelo, N. (1996). Gifted achievers and underachievers: A comparison of patterns found in school files. Journal of Counseling and Development, 74, 399-406.
28.
Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
29.
Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 152-170.
30.
Rimm, S. (1995). Why bright kids get poor grades and what you can do about it. New York: Crown Trade Paperbacks.
31.
Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 299-323.
32.
Schunk, D. H. (1981). Modeling and attributional effects on children's achievement: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 93-105.
33.
Schunk, D. H. (1984). Self-efficacy perspective on achievement behavior. Educational Psychologist, 19, 48-58.
34.
Schunk, D. H. (1998, November). Motivation and self-regulation among gifted learners. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Gifted Children, Louisville, KY.
35.
Supplee, P. L. (1990). Reaching the gifted underachiever. New York: Teachers College Press.
36.
Weiner, J. B. (1992). Psychological disturbance in adolescence (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
37.
Whitmore, J. R. (1980). Giftedness, conflict, and underachievement. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
38.
Wigfield, A. (1994). The role of children's achievement values in the self-regulation of their learning outcomes. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 101-124). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
Wigfield, A., & Karpathian, M. (1991). Who am I and what can I do? Children's self concepts and motivation in achievement situations. Educational Psychologist, 26, 233-262.
40.
Wolfle, J. A. (1991). Underachieving gifted males: Are we missing the boat? Roeper Review, 13, 181-184.
41.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 3-21). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
