Evidence of equivalence of measures is necessary before comparisons can be made across groups. Comparability of a measure is a matter of degrees from weak to strong. Many examinations of factorial invariance examine the factor pattern coefficients but not the stronger requirement of equivalence of intercept terms. This study examined the cross-age comparability of the widely used Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) in a sample of adolescents and adults in families receiving Aid to Families With Dependent Children (AFDC). Multiple-group mean and covariance structures (MACS) analysis was used to demonstrate strong invariance of the measures and make comparisons across age groups. Similarities of means in the RSES were found across groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
2.
Bachman, J. G., & O’Malley, P. M. (1977). Self-esteem in young men: A longitudinal analysis of the impact of educational and occupational attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 365-380.
3.
Benda, B., Whiteside-Mansell, L., & Corwyn, R. F. (1996, July). Testing a theoretical model of sexual behavior among adolescents in AFDC families. Paper presented at the National Association for Welfare Research and Statistics, San Francisco.
4.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
5.
Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS for Windows user’s guide. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
6.
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
7.
Bentler, P. M., & Mooijaart, A. (1989). Choice of structural model via parsimony: A rationale based on precision. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 315-317.
8.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
9.
Byrne, B. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1, 55-86.
10.
Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1987). Adolescent self-concept: Testing the assumption of equivalent structure across gender. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 365-385.
11.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (1999). Testing factorial invariance across groups: A reconceptualization and proposed new method. Journal of Management, 25, 1-27.
12.
Chubb, N. H., Fertman, C. I., & Ross, J. L. (1997). Adolescent self-esteem and locus of control: A longitudinal study of gender and age differences. Adolescence, 32, 113-129.
13.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Still stable after all these years: Personality as a key to some issues of aging. In P. Baltes & O. G. Brim (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 65-102). New York: Academic Press.
14.
Cunningham, W. R. (1991). Issues in factorial invariance. In L. M. Collins & J. L Horn (Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change (pp. 106-114). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15.
Goldsmith, R. E. (1986). Dimensionality of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 1, 253-264.
16.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). The replication and invariance of factors. In R. L. Gorsuch (Ed.), Factor analysis (pp. 328-353). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Hensley, W. E., & Roberts, M. K. (1976). Dimensions of Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale. Psychological Reports, 38, 583-584.
18.
Horn, J. L. (1991). Discussion of issues in factorial invariance. In L. M. Collins & J. L Horn (Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change (pp. 114-125). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19.
Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117-144.
20.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Hughes, D., Seidman, E., & Williams, N. (1993). Cultural phenomena and the research enterprise: Toward a culturally anchored methodology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 687-703.
22.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1981). LISREL V: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago: National Educational Resources.
23.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996a). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software, Inc.
24.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996b). PRELIS 2: User’s reference guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software, Inc.
25.
Kaplan, H. B., & Pokorny, M. D. (1969). Self-derogation and psychological adjustment. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 149, 421-434.
26.
Little, T. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53-76.
27.
Marsh, H. W. (1996). Positive and negative self-esteem: A substantively meaningful distinction or artifacts? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 810-819.
28.
Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562-582.
29.
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525-543.
30.
Mortimer, J. T., Finch, M. D., & Kumka, D. (1982). Persistence and change in development: The multidimensional self-concept. In P. B. Baltes & O. G. Brim Jr. (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 264-315). New York: Academic Press.
31.
Muthen, B. B., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 171-189.
32.
Nesselroade, J. R. (1977). Issues in studying developmental change in adults from a multivariate perspective. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 59-69). New York: Van Nostrand.
33.
Openshaw, D. K., Thomas, D. L., & Rollins, B. C. (1981). Adolescent self-esteem: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of Early Adolescence, 1, 273-282.
34.
Owens, T. J. (1993). Accentuating the positive and the negative: Rethinking the use of self-esteem, self-deprecation, and self-confidence. Social Psychological Quarterly, 56, 288-299.
35.
Reise, S. P., Smith, L., & Furr, R. M. (2001). Invariance on the NEO PI-R Neuroticism Scale. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 83-110.
36.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
Rosenberg, M., & Pearlin, L. I. (1978). Social class and self-esteem among children and adults. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 53-77.
38.
Simmons, R. G., & Blyth, D. A. (1987). Moving into adolescence: The impact of pubertal change and school context. New York: Aldine.
39.
Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.
40.
Tomas, J. M., & Oliver, A. (1999). Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale: Two factors or method effects. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 84-98.
41.
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10.
42.
Vacha-Haase, T., Kogan, L. R., & Thompson, B. (2000). Sample compositions and variabilities in published studies versus those in test manuals: Validity of score reliability inductions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 509-522.
43.
Wingfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Iver, D. M., Reuman, D. A., & Midgley, C. (1991). Transitions during early adolescence: Changes in children’s domain-specific self-perceptions and general self-esteem across the transition to junior high school. Developmental Psychology, 27, 552-565.
44.
Zimmerman, M. A., Copeland, L. A., Shope, J. T., & Dielman, T. E. (1997). A longitudinal study of self-esteem: Implications for adolescent development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26, 117-141.
