The self-control test developed by Grasmick, Tittle, Bursik, and Arneklev was designed to measure each of six components of self-control, namely, impulsivity, a preference for simple rather than complex tasks, risk seeking, a preference for physical rather than cerebral activities, a self-centered orientation, and a volatile temper. This conceptualization clearly suggests that self-control may be defined as a higher order construct that leads to each of these components, which in turn may be represented as first-order factors or constructs. However, due to various limitations, previous analyses of the test failed to establish this factor structure. By employing proper methods for the factor analysis of Likert-type items and explicitly testing a higher order structure, the authors show that the self-control test may provide more valid measurement of the psychological constructs it was intended to measure than previous research suggests.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baumeister, R. F., & Boden, J. M. (1998). Aggression and the self: High self-esteem, low self-control, and ego threat. In R. G. Geen & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Human aggression: Theories, research, and implications of social policy (pp. 111-137). Boston: Academic Press.
2.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
3.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
4.
Caspi, A. (2000). The child is the father of the man: Personality continuities from childhood to adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 158-172.
5.
Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Paxton, P., Kirby, J., & Chen, F. (2000, June). Point estimate and confidence intervals of the RMSEA: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation. Paper presented at the 2000 meeting of the Psychometric Society, Vancouver, BC.
6.
Finkel, E. J., & Campbell, W. K. (2001). Self-control and accommodation in close relationships: An interdependence analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 263-277.
7.
Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Arriaga, X. B., Helms, R. W., Koch, G. G., & Linder, G. F. (1998). An evaluation of Safe Dates, an adolescent dating violence prevention program. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 45-50.
8.
Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Greene, W. F., Koch, G. G., Linder, G. F., & MacDougal, J. E. (2000). The Safe Dates program: 1-year follow-up results. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 1619-1621.
9.
Foshee, V. A., Linder, G. F., Bauman, K. E., Langwick, S. A., Arriaga, X. B., Heath, J., McMahon, P. M., & Bangdiwala, S. (1996). The Safe Dates project: Theoretical basis, evaluation design, and selected baseline findings. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 12, 39-48.
10.
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1997). Exploratory factor analysis: Its role in item analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 532-560.
12.
Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5-29.
13.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1998a). LISREL 8: A preprocessor for LISREL. Chicago: Scientific Software, Inc.
14.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1998b). PRELIS 2: A preprocessor for LISREL. Chicago: Scientific Software, Inc.
15.
Longshore, D., Turner, S., & Stein, J. A. (1996). Self-control in a criminal sample: An examination of construct validity. Criminology, 34, 209-226.
16.
Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 362-582.
17.
Mischel, W. (1974). Processes in delay of gratification. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 249-292). New York: Academic Press.
18.
Muthén, B. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika, 49, 115-132.
19.
Muthén, B. O. (1993). Goodness of fit with categorical and other nonnormal variables. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 205-234). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Author.
21.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
Olsson, U. (1979). Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 44, 443-460.
23.
Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An internal estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.
24.
West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
