Factor analysis was applied to the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Third Edition (WISC-III) scores of 505 gifted students to evaluate the construct validity of the WISC-III with this population. Multiple criteria were used to determine the number of factors to retain for principal axis extraction. A two-factor solution that roughly mirrored the verbal comprehension and perceptual organization factors of the WISC-III normative sample appeared to be most supportable. Arithmetic, Picture Arrangement, and Coding subtests failed to contribute to this solution. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that subtests that emphasize speed of responding are not valid for gifted children and suggest that an alternative WISC-III composite score, the General Ability Index, may be a better summary of ability for gifted students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, R. A. , Carson, K. P., Alliger, G. M., & Carr, L. (1987). Correcting doubly truncated correlations: An improved approximation for correcting the bivariate normal correlation when truncation has occurred on both variables. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 309-315.
2.
Bireley, M. , Languis, M., & Williamson, T. (1992). Physiological uniqueness: A new perspective on the learning disabled/gifted child. Roeper Review, 15, 101-107.
3.
Brown, S. W. , Hwang, M. T., Baron, M., & Yakimowski, M. E. (1991). Factor analysis of responses to the WISC-R for gifted children. Psychological Reports, 69, 99-107.
4.
Brown, S. W. , & Yakimowski, M. E. (1987). Intelligence scores of gifted students on the WISCR. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 130-134.
5.
Canivez, G. L. , & Watkins, M. W. (1998). Long term stability of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition. Psychological Assessment, 10, 285-291.
6.
Cattell, P. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 1-22.
7.
Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
8.
Cudeck, R. (2000). Exploratory factor analysis. In H.E.A. Tinsley & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Hand-book of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 265-296). New York: Academic Press.
9.
Daniel, M. H. (1997). Intelligence testing: Status and trends. American Psychologist, 52, 1038-1045.
10.
Das, J. P. , Kirby, J., & Jarman, R. F. (1975). Simultaneous and successive synthesis: An alternative model for cognitive abilities. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 87-103.
11.
Detterman, D. K. , & Daniel, M. H. (1989). Correlations of mental tests with each other and with cognitive variables are highest for low-IQ groups. Intelligence, 13, 349-359.
12.
Fabrigar, L. R. , Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299.
13.
Fishkin, A. S. , Kampsnider, J. J., & Pack, L. (1996). Exploring the WISC-III as a measure of giftedness. Roeper Review, 18, 226-231.
14.
Flanagan, D. P. , McGrew, K. S., & Ortiz, S. O. (2000). The Wechsler Intellience Scales and Gf- Gc theory: A contemporary approach to interpretation. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
15.
Ford, J. K. , MacCallum, R. C., & Tait, M. (1986). The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: A critical review and analysis. Personnel Psychology, 39, 291-314.
16.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1990). Common factor analysis versus component analysis: Some well and little known facts. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 33-39.
18.
Hair, J. F. , Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19.
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
20.
Hunter, J. E. , & Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting errors and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
Karnes, F. A. , & Brown, K. E. (1980). Factor analysis of the WISC-R for the gifted. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 197-199.
22.
Kaufman, A. S. (1992). Evaluation of the WISC-III and WPPSI-R for gifted children. Roeper Review, 14, 154-158.
23.
Kush, J. C. (1996). Factor structure of the WISC-III for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 14, 32-40.
24.
Macmann, G. M. , & Barnett, D. W. (1992). Redefining the WISC-R: Implications for professional practice and public policy. Journal of Special Education, 26, 139-161.
25.
Macmann, G. M. , & Barnett, D. W. (1994). Structural analysis of correlated factors: Lessons from the verbal-performance dichotomy of the Wechsler scales. School Psychology Quarterly, 9, 161-197.
26.
Macmann, G. M. , Plasket, C. M., Barnett, D. W., & Siler, R. F. (1991). Factor structure of the WISC-R for children of superior intelligence. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 19-36.
27.
Masten, W. G. , Morse, D. T., & Wenglar, K. E. (1995). Factor structure of the WISC-R for Mexican-American students referred for intellectually gifted assessment. Roeper Review, 18, 130-131.
28.
Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749.
29.
Nunnally, J. C. , & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
30.
Prifitera, A. , Weiss, L. G., & Saklofske, D. H. (1998). The WISC-III in context. In A. Prifitera & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), WISC-III: Clinical use and interpretation (pp. 1-38). New York: Academic Press.
31.
Reams, R. , Chamrad, D., & Robinson, N. (1990). The race is not necessarily to the swift: Validity of the WISC-R bonus points for speed. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 108-110.
32.
Sattler, J. M. (1992). Assessment of children: Revised and updated third edition. San Diego, CA: Author.
33.
Sparrow, S. S. , & Gurland, S. T. (1998). Assessment of gifted children with the WISC-III. In A. Prifitera & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), WISC-III: Clinical use and interpretation (pp. 59-72). New York: Academic Press.
34.
Stanley, J. C. (1997). Varieties of intellectual talent. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 93-119.
35.
State Board of Education . (2000). Gifted education: Special education services and programs. Pennsylvania Bulletin, 30, 6330-6342.
36.
Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Intelligence applied: Understanding and increasing your intellectual skills. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
37.
Velicer, W. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 31, 321-327.
38.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
39.
Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
40.
Winner, E. (2000). The origins and ends of giftedness. American Psychologist, 55, 159-169.
41.
Wood, J. M. , Tataryn, D. J., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1996). Effects of under-and overextraction on principal axis factor analysis with varimax rotation. Psychological Methods, 1, 254-265.
42.
Woodward, T. S. , & Hunter, M. A. (1999). Estimation of unattenuated factor loadings. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 384-397.
43.
Zwick, W. R. , & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432-442.
