American Psychological Association . (1994). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Anderson, D. R. , Burnham, K. P., & Thompson, W. L. (2000). Null hypothesis testing: Problems, prevalence, and an alternative. Journal of Wildlife Management, 64, 912-923.
3.
Bakan, D. (1966). The test of significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 423-437.
4.
Carver, R. (1978). The case against statistical significance testing. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 378-399.
5.
Carver, R. (1993). The case against statistical significance testing, revisited. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 287-292.
6.
Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 1304-1312.
7.
Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
8.
Cortina, J. M. , & Dunlap, W. P. (1997). Logic and purpose of significance testing. Psychological Methods, 2, 161-172.
9.
Craig, J. R. , Eison, C. L., & Metze, L. P. (1976). Significance tests and their interpretation: An example utilizing published research and omega-squared. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 280-282.
10.
Cronbach, L. J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of psychology. American Psychologist, 30, 116-127.
11.
Dar, R. (1987). Another look at Meehl, Lakatos, and the scientific practices of psychologists. American Psychologist, 42, 145-151.
12.
Falk, R. , & Greenbaum, C. W. (1995). Significance tests die hard: The amazing persistence of a probabilistic misconception. Theory & Psychology, 5(1), 75-98.
13.
Frick, R. W. (1996). The appropriate use of null hypothesis testing. Psychological Methods, 1, 379-390.
14.
Hagen, R. L. (1997). In praise of the null hypothesis statistical test. American Psychologist, 52, 15-24.
15.
Harris, M. J. (1991). Significance tests are not enough: The role of effect-size estimation in theory corroboration. Theory & Psychology, 1, 375-382.
16.
Hunter, J. E. (1997). Needed: A ban on the significance test. Psychological Science, 8(1), 3-7.
17.
Kendall, P. C. (1997). Editorial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 15, 3-5.
18.
Kirk, R. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 746-759.
19.
Meehl, P. E. (1997). The problem is epistemology, not statistics: Replace significance tests by confidence intervals and quantify accuracy of risky numerical predictions. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 393-426). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
Mittag, K. C. , & Thompson, B. (2000). A national survey of AERA members’ perceptions of statistical significance tests and other statistical issues. Educational Researcher, 29(4), 14-20.
21.
Nickerson, R. S. (2000). Null hypothesis significance testing: A review of an old and continuing controversy. Psychological Methods, 5, 241-301.
22.
Robinson, D. , & Levin, J. (1997). Reflections on statistical and substantive significance, with a slice of replication. Educational Researcher, 26(5), 21-26.
23.
Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for the training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115-129.
24.
Sedlmeier, P. , & Gigerenzer, G. (1989). Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies?Psychological Bulletin, 105, 309-316.
25.
Shaver, J. (1993). What statistical significance testing is, and what it is not. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 293-316.
26.
Snyder, P. , & Lawson, S. (1993). Evaluating results using corrected and uncorrected effect size estimates. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 334-349.
27.
Steiger, J. H. , & Fouladi, R. T. (1997). Noncentrality interval estimation and the evaluation of statistical models. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 221-257). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28.
Thompson, B. (1996). AERA editorial policies regarding statistical significance testing: Three suggested reforms. Educational Researcher, 25(2), 26-30.
29.
Thompson, B. (1998). In praise of brilliance: Where that praise really belongs. American Psychologist, 53, 799-800.
30.
Thompson, B. (1999a). Journal editorial policies regarding statistical significance tests: Heat is to fire as p is to importance. Educational Psychology Review, 11, 157-169.
31.
Thompson, B. (1999b). Statistical significance tests, effect size reporting, and the vain pursuit of pseudo-objectivity. Theory & Psychology, 9(2), 191-196.
32.
Vacha-Haase, T. , Nilsson, J. E., Reetz, D. R., Lance, T. S., & Thompson, B. (2000). Reporting practices and APA editorial policies regarding statistical significance and effect size. Theory & Psychology, 10, 413-425.
33.
Zuckerman, M. , Hodgins, H. S., Zuckerman, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Contemporary issues in the analysis of data: A survey of 551 psychologists. Psychological Science, 4, 49-53.
