The unidimensional nature of the De Jong-Gierveld Loneliness Scale is investigated. The internal properties of the scale scores were studied using item response theory, supplemented by an external validity study. In line with the theory of relational loneliness, the results stress the significance of distinguishing between emotional loneliness and social loneliness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andersen, E. B. (1973). A goodness of fit test for the Rasch model. Psychometrika, 38, 123-140.
2.
Barer, B. M. (1994). Men and women aging differently. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 38, 29-40.
3.
Bentler, P. M. , Jackson, D. N., & Messic, S. (1971). Identification of content and style: A two-dimensional interpretation of acquiescence. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 186-204.
4.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss (Vol. 1): Attachment. London: Hogarth.
5.
Brinkman, W. (1977). Een assertiviteitsschaal II [An assertiveness scale II]. Amsterdam: Psychological Laboratory, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
6.
Broese van Groenou, M. I. , Van Tilburg, T., De Leeuw, E., & Liefbroer, A. C. (1995). Data collection. In C.P.M. Knipscheer, J. de Jong-Gierveld, T. G. van Tilburg, & P. A. Dykstra (Eds.), Living arrangements and social networks of older adults (pp. 185-197). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: VU University Press.
7.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
8.
Collins, L. M. (1996). Measurement of change in research on ageing: Old and new issues from an individual growth perspective. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (4th ed., pp. 38-56). London: Academic Press.
9.
De Jong-Gierveld, J. (1984). Eenzaamheid [Loneliness]. Deventer, the Netherlands: van Loghum Slaterus.
10.
De Jong-Gierveld, J. (1989). Personal relationships, social support and loneliness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 197-221.
11.
De Jong-Gierveld, J. , & Kamphuis, F. H. (1985). The development of a Rasch-type loneliness scale. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 289-299.
12.
De Jong-Gierveld, J. , & Van Tilburg, T. G. (1999). Manual of the loneliness scale. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Social Research Methodology.
13.
Dykstra, P. A. (1990). Next of (non)kin: The importance of primary relationships for older adults’ well-being. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
14.
Dykstra, P. A. (1995). Loneliness among the never and formerly married: The importance of supportive friendships and a desire for independence. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 50B, S321-S329.
15.
Dykstra, P. A. , & De Jong-Gierveld, J. (1994). The theory of mental incongruity, with a specific application to loneliness among widowed men and women. In R. Erber & R. Gilmour (Eds.), Theoretical frameworks for personal relationships (pp. 235-259). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Fischer, G. H. , & Molenaar, I. W. (Eds.) (1995). Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.
17.
Glas, C.A.W. , & Verhelst, N. D. (1995). Testing the Rasch model. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 69-95). New York: Springer-Verlag.
18.
Glick, I. G. , Weiss, R. S., & Parkes, C. M. (1974). The first year of bereavement. New York: John Wiley.
19.
Gustafsson, J. E. (1979). PML: A computer program for conditional estimation and testing in the Rasch model for dichotomous items. Reports from the Institute of Education, University of Göteborg, nr. 85.
20.
Hansson, R. O. , Jones, W. H., Carpenter, B. N., & Remondet, J. H. (1986). Loneliness and adjustment to old age. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 24, 41-53.
21.
Knipscheer, C.P.M. , De Jong-Gierveld, J., Van Tilburg, T. G., & Dykstra, P. A. (Eds.). (1995). Living arrangements and social networks of older adults. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: VU University Press.
22.
Lopata, H. Z. (1969). Loneliness: Forms and components. Social Problems, 17, 248-262.
23.
Lopata, H. Z. (1979). Women as widows: Support systems. New York: Elsevier.
24.
Maddison, D. , & Walker, W. L. (1967). Factors affecting the outcome of conjugal bereavement. International Journal of Psychiatry, 113, 1057-1067.
25.
McMullen, P. A. , & Gross, A. E. (1983). Sex differences, sex roles, and health-related helpseeking. In J. D. Fisher, A. Nadler, & B. M. Depaulo (Eds.), New directions in helping (pp. 233-263). New York: Academic Press.
26.
Mokken, R. J. (1971). A theory and procedure of scale analysis. Den Haag, the Netherlands: Mouton.
27.
Mokken, R. J. , & Lewis, C. (1982). A nonparametric approach to the analysis of dichotomous item responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 417-430.
28.
Molenaar, I. W. (1983). Some improved diagnostics for failure of the Rasch model. Psychometrika, 48, 49-72.
29.
Molenaar, I. W. (1990). PML: User’s manual PC version. Groningen, the Netherlands: IEC ProGAMMA.
30.
Moorer, P. , & Suurmeijer, T.P.B.M. (1993). Unidimensionality and cumulativeness of the loneliness scale using Mokken scale analysis for polychotomous items. Psychological Reports, 73, 1324-1326.
31.
Oort, F. J. (1994). Potentiële schenders van de eendimensionaliteit van psychologische meetinstrumenten [Potential violators of the unidimensionality of psychological measurement instruments]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 49, 35-46.
32.
Peplau, L. A. (1985). Loneliness research: Basic concepts and findings. In I. G. Sarason & B. R. Sarason (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research and applications (pp. 269-286). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Nijhoff.
33.
Raphael, B. (1984). The anatomy of bereavement; A handbook for the caring professions. London: Hutchinson.
34.
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (2nd ed.). Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
35.
Rorer, L. G. (1965). The great response-style myth. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 129-156.
36.
Stevens, N. L. (1995). Gender and adaptation to widowhood in later life. Ageing and Society, 15, 37-58.
37.
Stroebe, W. , Stroebe, M., Abakoumkin, G., & Schut, H. (1996). The role of loneliness and social support in adjustment to loss: A test of attachment versus stress theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1241-1249.
38.
van Baarsen, B. , Smit, J. H., Snijders, T.A.B., & Knipscheer, C.P.M. (1999). Do personal conditions and circumstances surrounding partner loss explain loneliness in newly bereaved older adults. Ageing and Society, 19, 441-469.
39.
Van Tilburg, T. G. (1988). Verkregen en gewenste ondersteuning in het licht van eenzaamheidservaringen [Obtained and desired social support in association with loneliness]. Doctoral dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
40.
Van Tilburg, T. G. (1995). Delineation of the social network and differences in network size. In C.P.M. Knipscheer, J. De Jong-Gierveld, T. G. Van Tilburg, & P. A. Dykstra (Eds.), Living arrangements and social networks of older adults (pp. 83-96). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: VU University Press.
41.
Van Tilburg, T. G. , & De Leeuw, E. D. (1991). Stability of scale quality under various data collection procedures: A mode comparison on the “De Jong-Gierveld Loneliness Scale.”International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 3, 69-85.
42.
Weiss, R. S. (1973). Loneliness: The experience of emotional and social isolation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43.
Weiss, R. S. (1993). Loss and recovery. In M. S. Stroebe, W. Stroebe, & R. O. Hansson (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement: Theory, research and intervention (pp. 271-284). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Zeller, R. A. , & Carmines, E. G. (1980). Measurement in the social sciences. The link between theory and data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
