This article presents an analysis of the potential for a school improvement process to foster professional community in three rural middle schools through the processes of organizational learning. The findings of this 2-year qualitative case study demonstrate the tensions schools must negotiate between bureaucracy and professional community and suggest that four organizational factors influence the establishment of professional community: principal leadership, organizational history, organizational priorities, and organization of teacher work. The findings further suggest that double-loop learning is invaluable to sustain professional community.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Argyris, C. , & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
Bellah, R. N. , Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
Bogdan, R. C. , & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
Brown, J. S. , & Duguid, P. (1995). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. In M. D. Cohen & L. S. Sproull (Eds.), Organizational learning (pp. 58-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Capper, C. A. (1993). Rural community influences on effective school practices. Journal of Educational Administration, 31(3), 20-38.
6.
Cuban, L. (1983). Effective schools: A friendly but cautionary note. Phi Delta Kappan, 64(10), 695-696.
7.
Darling-Hammond, L. , & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995, April). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, pp. 597-604.
8.
Fullan, M. (1995). The limits and potential of professional development. In T. R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education (pp. 253-267). New York: Teachers College Press.
9.
Furman, G. C. (1994, October). Schools in community: Implications of a sociological framework. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Philadelphia, PA.
10.
Furman, G. C. (1998). Postmodernism and community in schools: Unraveling the paradox. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 298-328.
11.
Garvin, D. A. (1993, July/August). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, pp. 78-91.
12.
Gergen, K. J. , & Gergen, M. M. (1991). Toward reflexive methodologies. In F. Steir (Ed.), Research and reflexivity (pp. 76-95). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13.
Glaser, B. G. , & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
14.
Glesne, C. , & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. White Plains, NY: Longman.
15.
Guba, E. G. , & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
Hedberg, B. (1981). How organizations learn and unlearn. In P. C. Nystrom & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design (pp. 9-11). New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Howley, C. B. (1989). Synthesis of the effects of school and district size: What research says about achievement in small schools and school districts. Journal of Rural and Small Schools, 4(1), 2-12.
18.
Huber, G. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 1, 88-115.
19.
Keefe, J. W. , & Howard, E. R. (1997). Redesigning schools for the new century: A systems approach. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
20.
Levitt, B. , & March, J. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319-340.
21.
Lieberman, A. (1990). Schools as collaborative cultures: Creating the future now. New York: Falmer.
22.
Lieberman, A. (1995a, April). Practices that support teacher development. Phi Delta Kappan, pp. 591-596.
23.
Lieberman, A. (1995b). Restructuring schools: The dynamics of changing practice, structure, and culture. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), The work of restructuring schools: Building from the ground up (pp. 1-17). New York: Teachers College Press.
24.
Lincoln, Y. S. , & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25.
Little, J. W. , & McLaughlin, M. (1993). Introduction: Perspectives on cultures and contexts of teaching. In J. W. Little & M. McLaughlin (Eds.), Teachers’work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts (pp. 1-19). New York: Teachers College Press.
26.
Louis, K. S. , Kruse, S. D., & Marks, H. M. (1996). Schoolwide professional community. In F. M. Newman & Associates (Eds.). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality (pp. 179-203). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Louis, K. S. , & Marks, H. (1996). Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers’ work and student experiences in restructuring schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Educational Research Association, New York.
28.
Louis, K. S. , Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers’professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 757-798.
29.
Lugg, C. A. (1996). Calling for community in a conservative age. Planning and Changing, 27(1/2), 2-14.
30.
McLaughlin, M. W. (1991). Enabling professional development. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Staff development for education in the ‘90s: New demands, new realities, new perspectives. New York: Teachers College Press.
31.
Meltzoff, N. (1994). Relationship, the fourth “R”: The development of a classroom community. The School Community Journal, 4(2), 13-26.
32.
Minar, D. W. , & Greer, S. (1969). Human life and social interaction. In D. W. Minar & S. Greer (Eds.), The concept of community: Readings with interpretations. Chicago: Aldine.
33.
Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Nevis, E. C. , DiBella, A. J., & Gould, J. M. (1995). Understanding organizations as learning systems. Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 73-85.
35.
Oxley, D. (1997). Theory and practice of school communities. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33(Supplement), 624-643.
36.
Prawat, R. S. (1992, April). From individual differences to learning communities—our changing focus. Educational Leadership, 49, 9-13.
37.
Prawat, R. S. (1993). The role of the principal in the development of learning communities. Wingspan: The Pedamorphosis Communiquae, 9(2), 7-9.
38.
Rait, E. (1995). Against the current: Organizational learning in schools. In S. B. Bacharach & B. Mundell (Eds.), Images of schools: Structures and roles in organizational behavior (pp. 71-107). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40.
Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1994). Organizations or communities? Changing the metaphor changes the theory. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(2), 214-226.
42.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1996). Leadership for the schoolhouse. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43.
Smith, G. (1996). Ties, nets, and an elastic bund: Community in the postmodern city. Community Development Journal, 31(3), 250-259.
44.
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
45.
Stake, R. E. (1994). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 236-247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
Strauss, A. L. , & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
47.
Tönnies, F. (1957). Community and society (Gemeinschaft und gesellschaft) (C. P. Loomis, Ed. and Trans.). East Lansing: Michigan State University Press. (Original work published 1887)
48.
Valentine, J. W. (1997). Staff development manual. Columbia: University of Missouri, Missouri Center for School Improvement.
