The work behavior of 94 elementary school principals in Israel was examined using a structured observation technique. The work finctions of these principals was compared with a formal job description document which was used as a performance criterion. The Israeli principals exhibited the work characteristics of brevity, variety, and fragmentation, supporting previous research on the nature of administrators'work. However, the Israeli principals were different in various dimensions, including higher levels of initiation and planning and strong social orientation. They also exhibited a unique profile of functional prioritization in terms of time allocation. These results are explained in light of sociocultural features of the Israeli work environment and structural characteristics of the Israeli educational system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aharoni, Y. (1993). Management culture in the public-business sector in Israel. In A. Shenhar & A. Yarkoni (Eds.), Israeli management culture (pp. 245-266). Tel Aviv, Israel: Cherikover (Hebrew).
2.
Burns, T. , & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
3.
Caiden, C. (1970). Israeli administrative culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
Cascio, W. F. (1992). Managing human resources: Productivity, quality of work life, profits. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5.
Chung, K. A. , & Miskel, C. G. (1989). A comparative study of principals' administrative behavior.Journal of Educational Administration, 27(1), 45-57.
6.
Crow, G. M. , & Glascock, K. (1992). Socialization to a new conception of the principalship.Journal of Educational Administration, 33(1), 22-43.
7.
De Bevoise, W. (1984, February). Synthesis of research on the principal as instructional leader. Educational Leadership, pp. 14-20.
Duignan, P. (1980). Administration behavior of school superintendents: A descriptive study.Journal of Educational Administration, 18(1), 5-25.
10.
Duke, D. L. (1982, October). Leadership functions and instructional effectiveness. NAASP Bulletin, pp. 1-12.
11.
Gali, J. (1982). The evaluation component: An exploratory study in educational administration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
12.
Gali, J. (1983). The administrative behavior of high school principals.Studies in Educational Administration and Organization, 37/38, 283-305.
13.
Gali, J. (1988). The structure of managerial behavior: An international aspect in educational administration. Studies in Educational Administration and Organization, 15, 41-56 (Hebrew).
14.
Gardinger, M. (1993). Thoughts toward the formation of an Israeli management model. In A. Shenhar & A. Yarkoni (Eds.), Israeli management culture (pp. 99-108). Tel Aviv, Israel: Cherikover (Hebrew).
15.
Gaziel, H. H. (1993). Education policy at a crossroads between change and continuity: Education in Israel in the past decade. Jerusalem, Israel: Institute for the Study of Educational Systems.
16.
Gaziel, H. H. (1994). Implementing reforms in a centralized education system: The case of Israeli education.Oxford Review of Education, 20(2), 237-249.
17.
Grant, J. (1988). Women as managers: What they can offer to organizations.Organizational Dynamics, 16, 56-63.
18.
Hallinger, P. , & Leithwood, K. (1996). Culture and educational administration.Journal of Educational Administration, 34(5), 98-116.
19.
Heck, R. H. (1992). Principals' instructional leadership and school performance: Implications for policy development.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 21-34.
20.
Heck, R. H. (1996). Leadership and culture: Conceptual and methodological issues in comparing models across cultural settings.Journal of Educational Administration, 34(5), 74-97.
21.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. London: Sage.
22.
Israeli Ministry of Education . (1994). School role-holders: Responsibilities and commitments—the principal. Jerusalem, Israel.
23.
Jansen, P. (1996, August 22-25). What successful managers really do: Results from an empirical study.Presented at the fifth international conference on Work Values and Behavior, Montreal, Canada.
24.
Kmetz, J. T. , & Willower, D. J. (1982). Elementary school principals' work behavior.Educational Administration Quarterly, 18, 62-78.
25.
Kotter, J. P. (1982). The General Managers. New York: Free Press.
26.
Kurke, L. B. , & Aldrich, H. E. (1983). Mintzberg was right: A replication and extension of the nature of managerial work.Management Science, 29(8), 975-984.
27.
Lee, V. E. , Dedrick, R. F., & Smith, J. B. (1991). The effect of the social organization of schools on teachers efficacy and satisfaction.Sociology of Education, 64, 190-208.
28.
Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring.Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498-518.
29.
Levin, B. (1993). School response to a changing environment.Journal of Educational Administration, 31(2), 4-20.
30.
Luthans, F. (1988). Successful vs. effective real managers.Academy of Management Executive, 2, 127-132.
31.
Luthans, F. , Rosenkrantz, S. A., & Hennessy, H. W. (1985). What do successful managers really do? An observation study of managerial activities.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 21(3), 255-270.
32.
Mangieri, J. N. , & Arnn, J. W. Jr. (1985). Excellent schools: The leadership functions of principals.American Education, 21(3), 8-10.
33.
Martin, W. J. , & Willower, D. J. (1981). The managerial behavior of high school principals.Educational Administration Quarterly, 17, 69-90.
34.
Martinko, M. J. , & Gardner, W. L. (1985). Beyond structured observation: Methodological issues and new directions.Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 676-695.
35.
Meshulam, I. (1993). Organizational culture: Definitions and components. In A. Shenhar & A. Yarkoni (Eds.), Israeli management culture (pp. 39-50). Tel Aviv, Israel: Cherikover (Hebrew).
36.
Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.
37.
Morris, V. C. , Crowson, R. L., Porter-Gehrie, C., & Hurwitz, E. Jr. (1984). Principals in action: The reality of managing schools. Columbus, OH: Merril.
38.
Pitner, N. J. , & Ogawa, R. T. (1981). Organizational leadership: The case of the school superintendent.Educational Administration Quarterly, 17, 45-66.
39.
Rebore, R. W. (1991). Personnel administration in education: A management approach (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
40.
Rosenblatt, Z. (1997). Work ethics of school administrators. Working paper, University of Haifa, Faculty of Education.
41.
Rosenblatt, Z. , & Ruvio, A. (1996). A test of a multidimensional model of job insecurity: The case of Israeli teachers.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 587-605.
42.
Rutter, R. A. (1986). Facilitating teacher engagement. Madison: University of Wisconsin, National Center on Effective Secondary Schools.
43.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1991). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
44.
Shenhar, A. , & Yarkoni, A. (Eds.). (1993). Israeli management culture. Tel Aviv, Israel: Cherik over (Hebrew).
45.
Sproull, L. S. (1981). Managing education programs: A micro-behavioral analysis.Human Organization, 40(2), 113-122.
46.
Tichy, N. M. , & Devanna, M. A. (1986). The transformational leader. New York: John Wiley.
47.
Toren, N. (1996, June-July). Is there a female managing style? Executive, pp. 12-18 (Hebrew).
48.
Ubben, G. C. , & Hughes, L. W. (1992). The principal: Creative leadership for effective schools. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
49.
Vandenberghe, R. (1995). Creative management of a school: A matter of vision and daily interventions.Journal of Educational Adninistration, 33(2), 31-51.
50.
Vardi, Y. , Shirom, A., & Jacobson, D. (1980). A study on the leadership beliefs of Israeli managers.Academy of Management Journal, 23(2), 52-59.
51.
Vollansky, A. , & Bar-Elli, D. (1996). Moving toward equitable school-based management.Educational Leadership, 53(4), 60-62.
52.
Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems.Adninistrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1-19.
53.
Weinreb, B. (1987). Cultural reflections in multi-national corporations: A comparison between U.S. and Israeli subsidiaries. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Department of Sociology, Palo Alto, CA.
54.
Weinshall, T. , & Kfir, A. (1993). The Israeli social-cultual system: Characteristics and implications in public administraion. In A. Shenhar & A. Yarkoni (Eds.), Israeli management culture (pp. 267-285). Tel Aviv, Israel: Cherikover (Hebrew).
55.
Weldy, G. R. (1979). Principals: What they do and who they are. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
56.
Willis, Q. (1980). The work activities of school principals: an observational study.Journal of Educational Administration, 18(1), 27-54.
