Efficiency and Effectiveness Analysis of Chicago Public Elementary Schools: 1989,1991,1993

Abstract

This article reports on research designed to respond to a set of problems normally associated with the assessment of school performance. It is more concerned with specific resource effects in specific schools than with effectiveness and efficiency in the use of individual school resources in the assessment of a system 's performance over time. The emphasis is on the overall performance of the entire set of elementary schools in the Chicago Public School System rather than on the resource use in each school. Joining standard regression techniques with the results of data envelopment analysis, the basic questions asked are the following: Are there discernible changes in the performance of Chicago elementary schools following the fundamental school reforms of 1988-1989? Are these changes in the desired direction? The results suggest encouraging improvement in schooling outcomes over the period of study.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, L. , & Walberg, H. (1994). Data envelopment analysis. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

Bessent, A. M. , & Bessent, E. W. (1993). Using data envelopment analysis for measuring productivity. In H. J. Walberg (Ed.), Advances in educational productivity: Analytic methods for educational productivity. Greenwich, CT: JAI.

Bessent, A. M. , Bessent, E. W. , Charnes, A. , Cooper, W. W. , & Thorgood, N. (1983). Evaluation of educational program proposals by means of data envelopment analysis.Educational Administration Quarterly, 19(2), 82-107.

Bessent, A. M. , Bessent, E. W. , Clark, T. , & Elam, J. (1988). Efficiency frontier determination by constrained facet analysis.Operations Research, 36(5), 785-786.

Bessent, A. M. , Bessent, E. W. , Kennington, T. , & Reagan, B. (1982). An application of mathematical programming to assess productivity in the Houston Independent School District.Management Science, 28(12), 1355-1367.

Charnes, A. , Cooper, W. W. , & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units.European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.

Consortium on Chicago School Research . (1995). Charting reform: Chicago teachers take stock. Chicago: Author.

Edmonds, R. (1979). Some schools work and more can.Social Policy, 9(5), 28-32.

Hanushek, E. A. (1986). The economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schools.Journal of Economic Literature, 24, 1141-1177.

10.

Jorgenson, D. W. (1996). Introduction. In E. A. Hanushek & D. W. Jorgenson (Eds.), Improving America's schools: The role of incentives. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

11.

Miller, T. (1985, October). Structure based changes in performance: The proper focus for social science.Paper presented at the Association for Public Policy and Management Conference, Boston, MA.

12.

National Commission on Excellence in Education . (1983). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

13.

Niemiec, R. P. , & Walberg, H. J. (Eds.). (1993). Evaluating Chicago school reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Whole issue Fall 1993, New Directions in Program Evaluation, a Publication of the American Evaluation Association.

14.

Seiford, L. M. (1996). Data envelopment analysis: The evaluation of the state of the art (1978-1995).Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7(213), 99-137.

15.

Silberberg, E. (1978). The structure of economics: A mathematical analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.

16.

Smith, M. S. , Scoll, B. W. , & Link, J. (1996). Research-based school reform: The Clinton administration's agenda. In E. A. Hanushek & D. W. Jorgenson (Eds.), Improving America's schools: The role of incentives. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.