This article discusses the relevance of Foucault's work to the field of educational administration. It argues for Foucault's concept of disciplinary practice as a powerful new generative metaphor for the field. A major implication of Foucault's view of power is that educational practices that may appear more democratic, participatory, or progressive may in fact constitute forms of disciplinary power and thus result in more effective technologies of control. The authors argue that regardless of which techniques of administration are used, the effects of disciplinary power cannot be escaped. No educational practices are inherently more empowering than others. They further discuss how disciplinary power operates through discourse practices, which, according to Foucault, link knowledge and power Discourses shape administrative practices, and administrative practices produce discourses. Finally, the authors discuss how Foucault's methodology (genealogy) can be used to determine why some discourses have prevailed over others in the field of educational administration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, G. L. (1990). Toward a critical constructivist approach to school administration: Invisibility, legitimation, and the study of non-events.Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(1), 38-59.
2.
Anderson, G. L. (1991). Cognitive politics of principals and teachers: Ideological control in an elementary school. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation (pp. 120-138). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Anderson, G. L. (in press). The politics of participation: Deconstructing the discourses of participatory reforms in education. Theory Into Practice.
4.
Angus, L (1996). Cultural dynamics and organizational analysis: Leadership, administration, and the management of meaning in schools. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 967-996). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
5.
Baack, D. , & Prasch, T. (1997). The death of the subject and the life of the organization: Implications of new approaches to subjectivity for organizational analysis.Journal of Management Inquiry, 6(2), 131-141.
6.
Bacharach, S. B. , & Mundell, B. (1993). Organizational politics in schools: Micro, macro, and logics of action.Educational Administration Quarterly, 29(4), 423-452.
7.
Bachrach, P. , & Baratz, M. (1963). Decisions and non decisions: An analytical framework.American Political Science Review, 56(1), 947-952.
8.
Ball, S. (1990). Management as moral technology: A Luddite analysis. In S. Ball (Ed.), Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge (pp. 153-166). London: Routdedge.
9.
Ball, S. (1994). Educational reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
10.
Barker, J. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams.Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 408-437.
11.
Barker, J. , & Cheney, G. (1994). The concept and the practices of discipline in contemporary organizational life.Communication Monographs, 61(1), 19-43.
12.
Bauman, Z. (1982). Memories of class: The pre-history and after-life of class. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
13.
Beck, L. (1994). Reclaiming educational administration as a caring profession. New York: Teachers College Press.
14.
Bernstein, R. J. (1996). The new constellation: The ethical-political horizons of modernity/postmodernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
Biesta, G. (1995, April). From manipulation to communication: Communicative pedagogy and the postmodern crisis of the subject.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
16.
Blount, J. (1994). One postmodernist perspective on educational leadership. Ain't I a leader? In S. J. Maxcy (Ed.), Postmodern school leadership: Meeting the crisis in educational administration. Westport, CT: Praeger.
17.
Blumberg, A. (1984). The craft of school administration and some other rambling thoughts.Educational Administration Quarterly, 20(4), 24-40.
18.
Callahan, R. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Carlson, D. (1997). Making progress: Education and culture in new times. New York: Teachers College Press.
20.
Cherryholmes, C. (1988). Power and criticism: Poststructural investigations in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
21.
Clegg, S. R. (1989). Frameworks of power. London: Sage.
22.
Corson, D. (Ed.). (1995). Discourse and power in educational organizations. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
23.
Corson, D. (1996). Emancipatory discourse practices. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 1043-1067). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24.
Dahl, R. (1961). Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25.
Donnelly, M. (1986). Foucault's genealogy of the human sciences. In M. Gane (Ed.), Towards a critique of Foucault (pp. 15-32). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
26.
Evers, C. W. , & Lakomski, G. (1996). Science in educational administration: A postpositivist conception.Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(3), 379-402.
27.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
28.
Ferguson, K. (1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
29.
Fine, M. (1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban public high school. Albany: State University of New York Press.
30.
Foster, W. (1980). Administration and the crisis in legitimacy: A review of Habermasian thought.Harvard Educational Review, 50(4), 496-505.
31.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.
32.
Foucault, M. (1973). Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason. New York: Vintage.
33.
Foucault, M. (1975). The birth of the clinic: An archeology of medical perception. New York: Vintage.
34.
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.
35.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings by Michel Foucault, 1972-1977 (C. Gorden, Ed.). New York: Pantheon.
36.
Goldhammer, R. (1969). Clinical supervision: Special methods for the supervision of teachers. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
37.
Gore, J. (1994). Enticing challenges: An introduction to Foucault and educational discourses. In R. Martusewicz & W. Reynolds (Eds.), Inside/out: Contemporary critical perspectives in education (pp. 109-120). New York: St. Martin's.
38.
Greenfield, T. B. (1973). Organizations as social inventions: Rethinking assumptions about change.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 9(5), 551-574.
39.
Greenfield, T. B. (1984). Leaders and schools: Willfulness and nonnatural order in organizations. In T. J. Sergiovanni & J. E. Corbally (Eds.), Leadership and organizational culture (142-169). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
40.
Gronn, P. (1983). Talk as the work: The accomplishment of school administration.Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 1-21.
41.
Gronn, P. (1986). Politics, power and the management of schools. In E. Hoyle (Ed.), The world yearbook of education: The management of schools (pp. 44-53). New York: Nichols.
42.
Habermas, J. (1994). The critique of reason as an unmasking of the human sciences: Michel Foucault. In M. Kelly (Ed.), Critique and power: Recasting the Foucault/Habennas debate (pp. 47-78). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43.
Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age. New York: Teachers College Press.
44.
Heilker, P. (1994). Discipline and Punish and process and paradigms (or Foucault, visibility, [dis]empowerment, and the construction of composition studies).Composition Studies, 22(1), 4-13.
45.
Herr, K. (in press). Symbolic uses of participation: Co-opting change. Theory Into Practice.
46.
Heslep, R. D. (1997). The practical value of philosophical thought for the ethical dimension of educational leadership.Educational Administration Quarterly, 33(1), 67-85.
47.
Hodgkinson, C. (1991). Educational leadership: The moral art. Albany: State University of New York Press.
48.
Howley, A. , & Hartnett, R. (1992). Pastoral power and the contemporary university: A Foucauldian analysis.Educational Theory, 42(3), 271-283.
49.
Hoy, W. (1996). Science and theory in the practice of educational administration: A pragmatic perspective.Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(3), 366-378.
50.
Jones, D. (1990). The genealogy of the urban schoolteacher. In S. Ball (Ed.), Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge (pp. 57-77). London: Routledge.
51.
Kearins, K. (1997). Power in organizational analysis: Delineating and contrasting a Foucauldian perspective.Electronic Journal of Radical Organization Theory [On-line serial], 2(2), 1-19. Available: http://www.mngt.waikato.ac.nz/depts/sm&lVjoumal/vol_3/kate.htm)
52.
Kenway, J. (1990). Education and the Right's discursive politics: Private versus state schooling. In S. Ball (Ed.), Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge (pp. 167-206). London: Routledge.
53.
Knight, J. , Smith, R., & Sachs, J. (1990). Deconstructing hegemony: Multicultural policy and a populist response. In S. Ball (Ed.), Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge (pp. 133-152). London: Routledge.
54.
Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America's schools. New York: Harper.
55.
Labaree, D. F. (1992). Power, knowledge, and the rationalization of teaching: A genealogy of the movement to professionalize teaching.Harvard Educational Review, 62, 123-154.
56.
Luke, A. (1992). The body literate: Discourse and inscription in early literacy training.Linguistics and Education, 4(1), 107-129.
57.
Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan.
58.
Lyotard, J. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massouri, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1979)
59.
Marshall, C. , Patterson, J., Rogers, D., & Steele, J. (1996). Caring as career: An alternative perspective for educational administration.Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(2), 271-294.
60.
Marshall, J. D. (1990). Foucault and educational research. In S. Ball (Ed.), Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge (pp. 11-28). London: Routledge.
61.
Maxcy, S. J. (1991). Educational leadership: A critical pragmatic perspective. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
62.
Maxcy, S. J. (1994). Introduction. In S. J. Maxcy (Ed.), Postmodern school leadership: Meeting the crisis in educational administration (pp. 1-13). Westport, CT: Praeger.
63.
McKinney, J. R. , & Garrison, J. W. (1994). Postmodermism and educational leadership: The new and improved panopticon. In S. J. Maxcy (Ed.), Postmodern school leadership: Meeting the crisis in educational administration (pp. 72-83). Westport, CT: Praeger.
64.
Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
65.
Miron, L. (1996). The social construction of urban education. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
66.
Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
67.
Pignatelli, F. (1993). What can I do? Foucault on freedom and the question of teacher agency.Educational Theory, 43(4), 411-432.
68.
Popkewitz, T. , & Brennan, M. (1994). Certification to credentialing: Reconstituting control mechanisms in teacher education. In K. Borman & N. Greenman (Eds.), Changing American education: Recapturing the past or inventing the future (pp. 32-70). Albany: State University of New York Press.
69.
Popkewitz, T. , & Brennan, M. (1997). Restructuring of social and political theory in education: Foucault and a social epistemology of school practices.Educational Theory, 47(3), 287-314.
70.
Ramazanoglu, C. (Ed.). (1993). Up against Foucault: Explorations of some tensions between Foucault and Feminism. London: Routledge.
71.
Robinson, V. (1996). Problem-based methodology and administrative practice.Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(3), 427-451.
72.
Roman, L. (1996). Spectacle in the dark: Youth as transgression, display, and repression.Educational Theory, 46(1), 1-22.
73.
Rusch, E. (1992, April). Strategic planning: Looking through the lens of Foucault.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
74.
Ryan, J. (1991). Observing and normalizing: Foucault, discipline, and inequality in schooling.Journal of Educational Thought, 25(2), 104-119.
75.
Scheurich, J. J. (1994a). Policy archeology.Journal of Education Policy, 9(4), 297-316.
76.
Scheurich, J. J. (1994b). Social relativism: A postmodernist epistemology for educational administration. In S. J. Maxcy (Ed.), Postmodern school leadership: Meeting the crisis in educational administration (pp. 17-46). Westport, CT: Praeger.
77.
Schubert, J. D. (1995). From a politics of transgression toward an ethics of reflexivity: Foucault, Bourdieu, and academic practice.American Behavioral Scientist, 38(7), 1003-1017.
78.
Sedlak, M. W. (1989). Let us go and buy a school master: Historical perspectives on the hiring of teachers in the United States, 1750-1980. In D. Warren (Ed.), American teachers: Histories of a profession at work (pp. 257-290). New York: Macmillan.
79.
Smart, B. (1986). The politics of truth and the problem of hegemony. In D. C. Hoy (Ed.), Foucault: A critical reader (pp. 157-174). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
80.
Smircich, L. , & Morgan, G. (1982). Leadership: The management of meaning.Journal of Applied Behavioral Studies, 18, 257-273.
81.
Spears, R. , & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication.Communication Research, 21(4), 427-459.
82.
Spring, J. (1985). American education. New York: Longman.
83.
Spring, J. (1994). Deculturalization and the struggle for equality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
84.
Starratt, R. J. (1993). The drama of leadership. London: Falmer.
85.
Tavares, H. (1996). Classroom management and subjectivity: A genealogy of educational identities.Educational Theory, 46(2), 189-201.
86.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
87.
Zeichner, K. (1991). Contradictions and tensions in the professionalization of teaching and the democratization of schools.Teachers College Record, 92(3), 363-379.
