Meetings are common occurrences in schools, but to date, minimal analytic research has focused on them This article reports on a case study of faculty meetings in a public elementary school. Three theoretical heuristics are used to examine how the faculty functioned as a task-performing work group, how conversations unfolded as dialogue, and how collective behavior in the meetings both conserved and helped to transform the social structure of the school.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beck, L. G. , & Murphy, J. (1993). Understanding the principalship: Metaphorical themes, 1920s-990s. New York: Teachers College Press.
2.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
Burbules, N. C. (1993). Dialogue in teaching: 7heoryandpractice. New York: Teachers College Press.
4.
Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
5.
Gee, J. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Falner.
6.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structure. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
Green, J. L. , & Dixon, C. N. (1993). Talking knowledge into being: Discursive and social practices in classrooms.Linguistics and Education, 5(3-4), 231-239.
8.
Gronn, P. E. (1983). Talk as the work: The accomplishment of school administration.Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 1-21.
9.
Gutmann, A. (1987). Democratic education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
Hackman, J. R. (1987).The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11.
Hackman, J. R. (Ed.). (1990). Groups that work (and those that don't): Creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
Hackman, J. R. , & Morris, C. G. (1977).Improving group performance effectiveness. In J.R. Hackman, E. E. Lawler III, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Perspectives on behavior in organizations (pp. 343-358). New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
Hackman, J. R. , & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
14.
King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain.American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 338-368.
15.
McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16.
Mehan, H. (1992). Understanding inequality in schools: The contributions of interpretive studies.Sociology of Education, 65, 1-20.
17.
Reitzug, U. C. (1994). A case study of empowering principal behavior.American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 283-307.
18.
Schwartzman, H. B. (1989). The meeting: Gatherings in organizations and communities. New York: Plenum.
19.
Schwartzman, H. B. (1993). Ethnography in organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Starratt, J. R. (1994). Building an ethical school: A practical response to the moral crisis in schools. London: Falmer.
21.
Strike, K. A. (1993). Professionalism, democracy, and discursive communities: Normative reflections on restructuring.American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 255-275.
22.
Wolcott, H. (1973). The man in the principal's office. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
