Charter schools are publicly funded schools of choice operating free of state regulation and independent of local school districts. Twenty-nine states have enacted laws establishing charter schools since 1991. Nationwide, an estimated 700 charter schools have opened their doors and hundreds more are planned This study examines the organizational and political obstacles encountered by "start-from-scratch" charter schools. We analyze what these challenges mean for individual charter schools, the charter school experiment in general, and the state's policy role in governing these new institutions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldrich, H. E. , & Auster, E. R. (1986). Even dwarfs started small: Liabilities of age and size and their strategic implications.Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 165-198.
2.
Anand, G. (1997, January 11). Charter school hits snag in high school plan. The Boston Globe, p. B3.
3.
Baldauf, S. (1997, September 2). Fifteen years of school reform: New ideas, modest results. The Christian Science Monitor, p. 1.
4.
Baum, JA.C. (1996). Organizational ecology. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 77-114). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Baum, J.A.C. , & Oliver, C. (1992). Institutional embeddedness and the dynamics of organizational populations.American Sociological Review, 57, 540-559.
6.
Bidwell, C. E. (1965). The school as a formal organization. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 972-1021). Chicago: Rand McNally.
7.
Bierlein, L. A. , & Mulholland, L. A. (1994a). Comparing charter school laws: The issue of autonomy. Phoenix, AZ: Morrison Institute for Public Policy.
8.
Bierlein, L. A. , & Mulholland, L A. (1994b). The promise of charter schools.Educational Leadership, 52(1), 34-40.
9.
Blau, P. M. (1970). A formal theory of differentiation in organizations.American Sociological Review, 35(2), 201-218.
10.
Brown, D. (1996, February 25). Chelmsford charter school finds a home for next fall. The Boston Globe, p. 4.
11.
Budde, R. (1989). Education by charter.Phi Delta Kappan, 70(7), 518-520.
12.
Chubb, J. , & Moe, T. (1990). Politics, markets, and American schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
13.
Cornell, T. (1996, May 20). Troubled water: Massachusetts charters sent off course. Boston Herald, p. BI.
14.
Education Commission of the States . (1995). Charter schools: What are they up to?Denver, CO: Author.
15.
Fichman, M. , & Levinthal, D. A. (1991). Honeymoons and the liability of adolescence: A new perspective on duration dependence in social and organizational relationships.Academy of Management Review, 16, 442-468.
16.
Finn, C. E. , Bierlein, L. A., & Manno, B. V. (1996). Charter schools in action: A first look. Indianapolis: Hudson Institute.
17.
Finn, C. E , Manno, B. V., & Bierdein, L. (1996). Charter schools in action: What have we learned?Indianapolis, IN: Hudson Institute.
18.
Freeman,. H. , Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1983). The liability of newness: Age dependence in onizaonal death rates.American Sociological Review, 48, 692-710.
19.
Ginsberg, R. (1996). The new intuitionalism, the new science, persistence and change: The power of faith in schools. In R. L Crowson, W. L. Boyd, & H. B. Mawhinney (Eds.), The politics of education and the new institutionalism (pp. 153-166). Washington, DC: Palmer.
20.
Goldring, E. B. (1996). Environmental adaptation and selection: Where are the parents and the public? In R. L. Crowson, W. L. Boyd, & H. B. Mawhinney (Eds.), The politics of education and the new institutionalism (pp. 43-53). Washington, DC: Falmer.
21.
Hall, R. H. , Haas, J. E., & Johnson, N. J. (1967). Organizational size, complexity, and formalization.American Sociological Review, 32(6), 903-912.
22.
Halpin, D. , & Fitz, J. (1991). Grant-maintained schools: Making a difference without being really different.British Journal of Educational Studies, 39, 409-423.
23.
Hart, J. (1995, August 23). Marblehead school backers say they're harassed. The Boston Globe, p. 1.
24.
Hassel, B. C. (1996a). Autonomy and constraint in charter school programs: The case of Massachusetts. Cambridge, MA: Taubman Center for State and Local Government, Harvard University.
25.
Hassel, B. C. (1996b). Reaching compromise: Charter school politics in four states. Cambridge, MA: Taubman Center for State and Local Government, Harvard University.
26.
Johnston, R. C. (1996, December 4). In '96 sessions, charter laws keep spreading. Education Week, p. 14.
27.
Kolderie, T. (1988). Chartered schools = choices for educators + quality for all students. Minneapolis, MN: Citizens League.
28.
Kolderie, T. (1990). Beyond choice to new public schools: Withdrawing the exclusive franchise in public education (Report No. 8). Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.
29.
Madsen, J. (1996). Private and public school partnerships: Sharing lessons about decentralization. London: Falmer.
30.
Martin, E. L. (1996, May 4). Charter school's wild popularity comes with cost. The Patriot Ledger, p. 9.
31.
Medler, A. (1996). Promise and progress.The American School Board Journal, 183(3), 26-28.
32.
Meyer, J. , Scott, W. R., & Strang, D. (1987). Centralization, fragmentation, and school district complexity.Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 186-201.
33.
Meyer, J. W. , & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony.American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
34.
Mulholland, L. , & Amsler, M. (1992). The search for choice in public education: The emergence of charter schools. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.
35.
Nathan, J. (1996). Charter schools: Creating hope and opportunity for American education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36.
Paige, C. (1995, May 25). Senate votes $17 billion budget in wee hour wrap-up. The Boston Globe, p. 16.
37.
Pfeffer, J. , & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
38.
Premack, E. (1996). Charter schools: California's education reform "power tool."Phi Delta Kappan, 78(1), 62-64.
39.
Reid, A. (1995, September 17). Charter schools off to unconventional start. The Boston Globe, South Weekly section, p. 1.
40.
Singh, J. V. , Tucker, D. J., & House, R. J. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness.Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 171-193.
41.
Sommerfeld, M. (1995, September 20). Curtain goes up on the life of new school. Education Week, p. 1.
42.
Stecldow, S. (1994, January 24). Private groups to compete for the chance to create new schools with public funds.The Wall Street Journal, p. BI.
43.
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142-193). Chicago: Rand McNally.
44.
Tyack, D. (1974). The one best system. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
U.S. Departmnt of Education . (1995). Digest of education statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
46.
Walsh, M. (1995, November 29). Declarations of independence. Education Week, pp. 3-7.
47.
Weber, M. (1946). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.
48.
Wohlstetter, P. , Wenning, R., & Briggs, K. L. (1995). Charter schools in the United States: The question of autonomy.Educational Policy, 9(4), 331-358.
49.
Wong, D. S. (1995a, May 31). Charter school gets old building: Weld gives low lease, $12m loan to fix it up. The Boston Globe, p. 17.
50.
Wong, D. S. (1995b, September 5). Founders, faculty eager to start renaissance in Boston. The Boston Globe, p. 29.
