This study provides a qualitative analysis of the Kentucky school-based performance award program. The study suggests that teachers were motivated by the program to modify teaching approaches to enhance student performance. The program also appears to have created relatively high levels of stress among teachers. Teachers and principals at six award-winning Kentucky schools reported attitudes and behaviors consistent with expectancy theory, goal-setting theory, and contingency theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Campbeli, J. P. , Dunnette, M. D., Lawler, E. E., Ill, & Weick, K. E., Jr. (1970). Managerial behavior, performance, and effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
2.
Corbett, H. D. , & Wilson, B. L. (1991). Testing, reform, and rebellion. Norwood, CT: Ablex.
3.
Cumming, C. M. (1994). Incentives that really do motivate.Compensation and Benefits Review, 26(3), 38-40.
4.
Firtone, W. A. (1994). Redesigning teacher salary systems for educational reform.American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 549-574.
5.
Gong, B. , & Reidy, E. F. (1996). Assessment and accountability in Kentucky's school reform. In J. B. Baron & D. P. Wolf (Eds.), Performance-based student assessment: Challenges and possibilities. Ninety-fifth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I (pp. 215-233). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Harp, L. (1995a, February 15). Ky. names schools to receive achievement bonuses.Education Week, 14(21),p. 11.
7.
Harp, L. (1995b, April 26). Ky. schools put on the line in bonus budgeting.Education Week, 14(31), pp. 1, 9.
8.
Heneman, R. L. (1992). Merit pay: linking pay increases to performance ratings. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
9.
Jacobson, S. L (1988). Merit pay and teaching as a career. In K. Alexander & D. Monk (Eds.), Attracting and compensating America's teachers (pp. 161-177). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
10.
Johnson, S. M. (1986). Incentives for teachers: What motivates, what matters.Educational Administration Quarterly, 22(3), 54-79.
11.
Kelley, C. (1997). Teacher compensation and organization.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(1), 15-28.
12.
Kentucky Department of Education. (1995a, February). Kentucky teacher. Frankfort: Author.
13.
Kentucky Department of Education. (1995b, July 10). KIRIS accountability cycle technical manual. Frankfort: Author.
14.
Kentucky Department of Education. (1996, May). Kentucky teacher. Frankfort: Author.
15.
Kentucky General Assembly Office of Education Accountability. (1995, December). Annual report. Frankfort: Author.
16.
Kentucky Institute for Education Research. (1995, January). An independent evaluation of the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (KIS). FrankfortAuthor.
17.
Koretz, D. M. , Barron, S., Mitchell, K. J., & Stecher, B. M. (1996). Perceived effects of the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (KIRIS). Washington, DC: Rand.
18.
Lawler, E. E., HII. (1986). High-involvement management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
Lawler, E. E., III. (1990). Strategic pay. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
Locke, E. A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3, 157-189.
21.
Madaus, G. F. (1988, Spring). The distortion of teaching and testing: High-stakes testing and instruction.Peabody Journal of Education, 65, 2946.
22.
Mento, A. J. , Steel, R. P., & Karen, R. J. (1987). A meta-analytic study of the efforts of goal setting on task performance: 1966-1984.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 52-83.
23.
Mitchell, D. E. , Ortiz, F I., & Mitchell, T. K. (1987). Work orientation and job performance: The cultural basis of teaching rewards and incentives. Albany: State University of New York Press.
24.
Mohrman, S. A. , & Lawler, E. E., III. (1996). Motivation for school reform. In S. H. Fuhrman & J. A. O'Day (Eds.), Rewards and reform: Creating educational incentives that work (pp. 115-143). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
Murnane, R. J. , & Cohen, D. K. (1986). Merit pay and the evaluation problem: Why most merit pay plans fail and a few survive.Harvard Educational Review, 56(1), 1-17.
26.
National Center for Education Statistics. (1995, February). Common core of data (CCD): School years 1987-88 through 1992-93 [CD-Rom]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement [Producer and Distributor].
27.
Odden, A. , & Kelley, C. (1997). Paying teachers for what they know and do: New and improved compensation strategies for improving schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
28.
Odden, A. , & Protsik, J. (1995, September). Pay and motivation for teachers. Unpublished manuscript, Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
29.
Reidy, E. (1995a, September). The Kentucky Education Reform Act and school-based performance awards.Paper presented at the Consortium for Policy Research in Education conference series on teacher compensation: Performance Pay, Washington, DC.
30.
Reidy, E. (1995b, January 18). Program review: Rewards and assistance implementation. Frankfort: Kentucky Department of Education.
31.
Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Teachers' workplace: The social organization of schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
32.
Rowan, B. (1996). Standards as incentives for instructional reform. In S. H. Fuhrman & J. A. O'Day (Eds.), Rewards and reform: Creating educational incentives that work (pp. 195-225). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33.
Steffy, B. E. (1993). The Kentucky education reform: Lessons for America. Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
34.
Welbourne, T. M. , & Mejia, L.R.G. (1995). Gainsharing: A critical review and a future research agenda.Journal of Management, 21, 559-609.
35.
Winograd, P. , Anderman, E., & Bliss, T. (1996). The relationship between Kentucky's reward system and teachers' attitudes toward teaching, learning, and reform. Lexington: University of Kentucky Institute on Education Reform.
36.
Wright, P. M. (1989). Testing the mediating role of goals in the incentive-performance relationship.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 699-705.
