Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This interpretive case study examines the political thinking underpinning the strategies and counterstrategies used by administrators and Black leaders engaged in a political struggle over the fate of seven Black youths who protested against unfair treatment in their suburban high school. Using the framework of political analysis developed by Bacharach and Mundell, this case study reveals the opposing logics of action, or underlying belief systems, that informed both administrative and community responses throughout this protest. This case study reveals that midlevel administrators acting out of an allegiance to, and belief in, orthodox images of administration face a paradox in diverse and changing school communities; the more these administrators aligned with images of effective administration as bureaucratic control, the more ineffective they became in interpreting and responding to a politically savvy interest group not subject to administrative authority.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alvey, D. T. , & Underwood, K. E. (1985). When boards and superintendents clash, it's over the balance of school power.American School Board Journal, 172(10), 21-25.

Andersen, G. L. (1990). Toward a critical constructivist approach to school administration: Invisibility, legitimation, and the study of non events.Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(1), 38-59.

Bacharach, S. B. , & Mundell, B. L. (1993). Organizational politics in schools: Micro, macro, and logics of action.Educational Administration Quarterly, 29(4), 423-452.

Ball, S. (1987). The micro-politics of the school: Toward a theory of school organization. New York: Methuen.

Blase, J. (1989). The teachers' political orientation vis-à-vis the principal: The micropolitics of the school. In J. Hannaway & R. Crowson (Eds.), The politics of reforming school administration (pp. 113-126). New York: Falmer.

Blase, J. (Ed.). (1991). The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Bolman, L. , & Deal, T. (1991). Reframing organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Denzin, N. (1989). Interpretive interactionism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Dworkin, R. (1986). Law's empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

10.

Edelman, M. (1977). Political language. New York: Academic Press.

11.

Fine, M. (1992). Disruptive voices: The possibilities of feminist research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

12.

Fraatz, J.M.B. (1989). Political principals: Efficiency, effectiveness, and the political dynamics of school administration.Qualitative Studies in Education, 2(1), 3-24.

13.

Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.

14.

Gamson, W. (1968). Power and discontent. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

15.

Greene, M. (1988). The dialectic of freedom. New York: Teachers College Press.

16.

Iannacone, L. , & Lutz, F. W. (1970). Politics, policy and power: The governance of public schools. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

17.

Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

18.

Katz, M. (1985). Match working styles and find your way to board/superintendent harmony.American School Board Journal, 172(2), 33-34.

19.

Lutz, F. W. , & Mertz, C. (1992). The politics of school/community relations. New York: Teachers College Press.

20.

MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue (2nd ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

21.

Mann, D. (1975). The politics of administrative representation: School administrators and local democracy. Lexington, MA: Lexington.

22.

Marshall, C., & Scribner, J. (Eds.). (1991). The micropolitics of education [Special issue].Education and Urban Society, 23(4).

23.

Maxcy, S. J. (1994). Educational leadership: A critical pragmatic perspective. New York: Bergin & Harvey.

24.

Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.

25.

Perrow, C. (1970). Organizational analyses: A sociological view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

26.

Peterson, P. (1976). School politics Chicago style. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

27.

Polakow, V. (1994). Lives on the edge: Single mothers in the other America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

28.

Ramos, A. G. (1981). The new science of organizations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

29.

Rodgers, D. (1968). Politics and bureaucracy in the New York City school system. New York: Random House.

30.

Rusch, E. , & Marshall, C. (1995, April). Gender filters at work in the administrative culture.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

31.

Sarason, S. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

32.

Selznick, P. (1992). The moral commonwealth. Berkeley: University of California Press.

33.

Weber, M. (1947). Power and bureacracy. In T. Parsons (Ed.), The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Free Press.

34.

Wilson, J. Q. (1995). Political organizations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

35.

Wlrt, F. M. , & Kirst, M. W. (1989). Schools in conflict. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

36.

Wolcott, H. (1977). The man in the principal's office. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Is the Land of Oz an Alien Nation? A Sociopolitical Study of School Community Conflict

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References