This article presents an analysis of the experiences of four middle schools with interdisciplinary teams. The findings suggest that although teaming is often considered to be a vehicle for the development of community in schools, it may also present tensions for the development of cohesiveness across teams. The findings are presented in the form of dilemmas for middle school administrators who seek to develop a school wide community that can support both teacher and student development.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ashton, P. T. , & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers' sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.
2.
Berends, M. , & King, B. (1994). A description of restructuring in nationally nominated schools: Legacy of the iron cage?Educational Policy, 8(1), 28-50.
3.
Block, P. (1994). Stewardship: Choosing service over self-interest. San Francisco: Barrett-Koehler.
4.
Brown, J. S. , & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation.Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57.
5.
Bryk, A. S. , Cambum, E., & Louis, K. S. (1996, April) Promoting school improvement through professional community: An analysis of Chicago elementary schools.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
6.
Bryk, A. S. , Lee, V. E., & Holland, P. E. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development . (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century. New York: Carnegie Corporation.
8.
Darling-Hammond, L. , & Snyder, J. (1992). Framing accountability: Creating learner-centered schools. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Ninety-First Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education: Vol. 1. The changing contexts of teaching (pp. 11-36). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
9.
Doda, N. (1977, February). The middle school: 1984 or 2001.Paper presented at the conference of the National Middle School Association, Columbus, OH.
10.
Doda, N. , & Lounsbury, J. H. (1986). Teacher to teacher. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
11.
Erb, T. O. (1987). What team organization can do for teachers.Middle School Journal, 18(4), 3-6.
12.
Firestone, W. A. , & Rosenblum, S. (1988). Building commitment in urban high schools.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 93(4), 285-299.
13.
George, P. S. (1982). Interdisciplinary team organization: Four operational phases.Middle School Journal, 13(3), 10-13.
14.
Hargreaves, A. , & Dawe, R. (1990). Paths of professional development: Contrived collegiality.Teacher and Teacher Education, 6(3), 227-241.
15.
Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and literatures.Organization Science, 2(1) 88-115.
16.
Johnson, S. M. (1990). Teachers at work: Achieving success in our schools. New York: Basic Books.
17.
Kessel, J.W.M. (1996). The corporate curriculum. Leiden, the Netherlands: Rijksuniversiteit Leiden.
18.
Kruse, S. D. (1994, April). Learning as collaboration in professional communities: An analysis of innovation in progress.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
19.
Kruse, S. D. , & Louis, K. S. (1994, April). Organizational learning in schools: A framework for analysis.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
20.
Larson, C. E. , & La Faston, F. M. (1989). Team work: What must go right, what can go wrong. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
Lee, V. E. , & Smith, J. (1996). Collective responsibility for learning and its effects on gains in achievement and engagement for early secondary students.American Journal of Education, 104, 103-147.
22.
Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring.Educational Administration Quarterly, 30, 498-518.
23.
Leithwood, K. , &Aiken, R. (1995). Making school smarter: A system for monitoring school and district progress. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
24.
Leithwood, K. , & Jantzi, D. (1990). Transformational leadership: How principals can help reform school cultures.School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1, 249-280.
25.
Little, J. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success.American Educational Workplace Journal, 19, 325-340.
26.
Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers' professional relations.Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509-536.
27.
Little, J. W. (1993). Professional community in comprehensive high schools: The two worlds of academic and vocational teachers. In J. W. Little & M. W. McLaughlin, Teachers' work: Individuals, colleagues and contexts (pp. 129-151). New York: Teachers College Press.
28.
Louis, K. S. (1992). Restructuring and the problem of teachers' work. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Ninety-First Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education: Vol. 1. The changing contexts of teaching (pp. 138-156). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
29.
Louis, K. S. (1994). Beyond "managed change": Rethinking how schools improve.School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5, 1-22.
30.
Louis, K. S. , Kruse, S. D., & Associates. (1995). Professionalism and community: Perspectives from urban schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
31.
Louis, K. S. , & Marks, H. (1996, April). Teachers' work and students' work: Does teachers' professional community affect the classroom?Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
32.
Louis, K. S. , Marks, H., & Kruse, S. D. (1994, April). Teachers' professional community in restructuring schools.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
33.
Louis, K. S. , & Smith, B. (1992). Cultivating teacher engagement: Breaking the iron law of social class. In F. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
34.
Louis, K. S. , & Versloot, B. (in press). High standards and cultural diversity: Cautionary tales of comparative research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Quarterly.
35.
Maeroff, G. I. (1993). Team building for school change: Equipping teachers for new roles. New York: Teachers College Press.
36.
Marks, H. , & Louis, K. S. (1995, April). The effects of empowerment on teachers classroom practices and student achievement.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
37.
Marks, H. , Louis, K. S., & Park, B. (1996, April). School organizational capacity and teacher empowerment.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
38.
Meier, D. (1995). The power of their ideas: Lessons for America from a small school in Harlem. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39.
Merenbloom, E. Y (1991). The team process: A handbook for teachers. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
40.
Merriam, S. (1990). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41.
Miles, M. B. (1981). Learning to work in groups: A practical guide for members and trainers. New York: Teachers College Press.
42.
Miles, M. B. , & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. London: Sage.
43.
Mitchell, T. R. (1993). Leadership values and accountability. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
44.
Murphy, J. , & Louis, K. S. (1994). Reshaping the principalship: Insights from transformational reform efforts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
45.
Newmann, F. M. (1991). "What is a restructured" school? A framework to clarify ends and means (Issue Rep. No. 1, Center on Organization of Schools and by the National Association of Secondary School Principals). Madison: University of Wisconsin.
46.
Newmann, F. M. , & Wehlage, G. G. (1996). Intellectual quality, community and sustained effort: Back to basics. In F. M. Newmann & Associates, School restructuring and student learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
47.
Perrow, C. (1972). Organizational analysis: A sociological view. Indianapolis, IN: Charles E. Merrill.
48.
Resnick, L. , Nolan, K., & Resnick, D. (1995). Benchmarking education standards.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(4), 438-461.
49.
Rosenblum, S. , Louis, K. S., & Rossmiller, R. (1994). School leadership and teacher quality of work life in restructuring schools. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Reshaping the principalship: Insights from transformational reform efforts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
50.
Rosenholtz, S. (1985). Effective schools: Interpreting the evidence.American Journal of Education, 93(3), 352-388.
51.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
52.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1994). Building community in schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53.
Siskin, L. (1994). Realms of knowledge. London: Falmer.
54.
Tjepkeme, S. (1995). Profiel van de lerende organisatie en haar opleidingsfunctie [Profile of the learning organization and its development function]. Twente, the Netherlands: University of Twente, Toegepaste Onderwijs.
55.
Yin, R. (1984). Case study research: Design and method. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
56.
Zander, A. (1977). Groups at work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
