This article is concerned with the development and implementation of the National Curriculum, which was introduced into England and Wales by the 1988 Education Reform Act. The main argument of the article is that the National Curriculum is a classic example of externally imposed educational reform, and that the limited role played by teachers and educational professionals in its development led directly to many of its implementation problems. The article ends with some issues for future research and action.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, R. , Rose, J., & Woodhead, C. (1992). Curriculum organisation and classroom practice in primary schools: A discussion paper. London: DES.
2.
Baker, K. (1993). The turbulent years. London: Faber.
3.
Barber, M. (Ed.). (1996). The National Curriculum: A study in policy. Keele, UK: Keele University Press.
4.
Bernstein, B. (1971). On the classification and framing of educational knowledge. In M. Young (Ed.), Knowledge and control. London: Collier Macmillan.
5.
Bernstein, B. (1977). Class codes and control (Vol 3.) London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
6.
Brumfit, C. , Mitchell, R., and Hooper, J. (1996) "Grammar," "language" and classroom practice. In M. Hughes (Ed.), Teaching and learning in changing times (pp. 70-87). Oxford: Blackwell.
7.
Callaghan, J. (1976). Towards a national debate.Education, 148(17), 332-333.
8.
Campbell, R. , & Neill, S. (1992). Teacher time and curriculum manageability at Key Stage One. London: Assistant Masters & Mistresses Association.
9.
Chitty, C. (1992). The education system transformed. Manchester, UK: Baseline.
10.
Chitty, C. , & Simons, B. (Eds.). (1993). Education answers back: Critical responses to government policy. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
11.
Cooper, P. , & McIntyre, D. (1996a). The importance of power sharing in classroom learning. In M. Hughes (Ed.), Teaching and learning in changing times (pp. 88-107). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
12.
Cooper, P. , & McIntyre, D. (1996b). Effective teaching and learning: Teachers' and students' perspectives. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
13.
Dearing, R. (1993). The National Curriculum and its assessment: Interim report. York/London: National Curriculum Council/School Examinations and Assessment Council.
14.
Dearing, R. (1994). The National Curriculum and its assessment: Final report. London: School Curriculum and Assessment Authority.
15.
Department of Education and Science (DES) . (1978). Primary education in England. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
16.
Department of Education and Science (DES) . (1979). Aspects of secondary education in England. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
17.
Department of Education and Science (DES) . (1985). Better schools. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
18.
Department of Education and Science (DES) . (1988). Education Reform Act. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
19.
Fullan, M. (1982). The meaning of educational change. London: Cassell.
20.
Fullan, M. (1993). The new meaning of educational change. London: Cassell.
21.
Gehrke, N. , Knapp, M., & Sirotnik, K. (1992). In search of the school curriculum.Review of Research in Education, 18, 51-110.
22.
Graham, D. (1993). A lesson for us all: The making of the National Curriculum. London: Routledge.
23.
Haviland, J. (Ed.). (1988). Take care, Mr. Baker!London: Fourth Estate.
24.
Hillgate Group . (1986). Whose schools? A radical manifesto. London: Author.
25.
Mitchell, R. , Brumfit, C., & Hooper, J. (1994). Knowledge about language: Policy, rationales and practices.Research Papers in Education, 9, 183-206.
26.
O'Hear, P. , & White, J. (Eds.) (1993). Assessing the National Curriculum. London: Paul Chapman.
27.
Plewis, I. , & Veltman, M. (1996a). Where does all the time go? Changes in pupils' experiences in Year 2 classrooms. In M. Hughes (Ed.), Teaching and learning in changing times (pp. 1-16). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
28.
Plewis, I. , & Veltman, M. (1996b). Opportunity to learn maths at Key Stage 1: Changes in curriculum coverage 1984-1993.Research Papers in Education, 11, 202-218.
29.
Pollard, A. , Broadfoot, P., Croll, P., Osborn, M., & Abbott, D. (1994). Changing English primary schools? The impact of the Education Reform Act at Key Stage 1. London: Cassell.
30.
Rudduck, J. (1991). Innovation and change. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
31.
Rudduck, J. , Harris, S., & Wallace, G. (1994). Coherence and students' experience of learning in the secondary school.Cambridge Journal of Education, 24(2), 197-211.
32.
Sexton, S. (1987). Our schools: A radical policy. Warlington, UK: Institute of Economic Affairs.
33.
Sexton, S. (1988, May 9). No nationalisation curriculum. The Times, p. 14
34.
Taylor, T. (1995). Movers and shakers: High politics and the origins of the National Curriculum.The Curriculum Journal, 6, 161-184.
35.
Watkins, P. (1993). The National Curriculum-an agenda for the nineties. In C. Chitty & B. Simons (Eds.), Education answers back: Critical responses to government policy (pp.70-84). London: Lawrence & Wishart.
36.
Whitty, G. (1989). The New Right and the National Curriculum: State control or market forces?Journal of Education Policy, 4, 329-341.
37.
Whitty, G. , Aggleton, P., & Rowe, G. (1996). Competing conceptions of quality in social education: Learning from the experience of the cross-curricular themes. In M. Hughes (Ed.), Teaching and learning in changing times. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
38.
Whitty, G. , Rowe, G., & Aggleton, P. (1994). Subjects and themes in the secondary school curriculum.Research Papers in Education, 9, 159-182.
39.
Williams, M. , Daugherty, R., & Banks, F. (Eds.). (1992). Continuing the education debate. London: Cassell.
