The short tenure and frequent turnover of urban superintendents has been attributed to the growing unmanageability of urban school districts. This instability at the top is said to limit the prospects for sustained reform. In this article, we calculate the average tenure of urban superintendents since the turn of the century. Our research suggests that the tenure of superintendents has been decreasing, but not in a linear fashion and not as precipitously as is often reported in the press. We believe that a complex mix of environmental, local, and professional factors may help explain changes in tenure, but the causal and interactive relationships between them remains a mystery. Nevertheless, our findings suggest the longer-than-anticipated tenures raise questions about the relationship of "short tenures" and the problems facing urban school districts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, J., Fennel, M., & Halpern, M. (1993). Leadership instability in hospitals: The influence of board-CEO relations and organizational growth and decline.Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 74-99.
2.
Arnez, N. (1981). The besieged school superintendent: A case study of school superintendent school board relations in Washington, D.GCWashington, DC: University Press of America.
3.
Bennett, D. (1991, April). Big-city blues.The American School Board Journal, pp. 22-24.
4.
Blumberg, A. (1985). The school superintendent: Living with conflict. New York: Teachers College Press.
5.
Bossert, S. (1988). School effects. In N. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 341-354). New York: Macmillan.
6.
Boston ends long search for schools chief. (1991, May 15). The New York Times, p. B7.
7.
Boyd, W. (1976). The public, the professionals, and educational policymaking: Who governs? Teachers College Record, 77(4), 539-577.
8.
Boyd, W., & Crowson, R. (1981). The changing conception and practice of public school administration. In D. Berliner (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 311-373). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
9.
Bradley, A. (1990, December 12). Rapid tumover in urban superintendents. Education Week, p. 3.
10.
Bridges, E. (1982). Research on the school administrator: The state of the art, 1967-1980.Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 12-33.
11.
Callahan, R. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Celis, W. (1993, February 17). Heads of big city schools need political skill to last. The New York Times, p. B6.
13.
Cohen, M., &. March, J. (1974). Leadership and ambiguity. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
14.
Cohen, R. (1990). Children of the mill: Schooling and society in Gary, Indiana, 1906-1960. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
15.
Cronin, J. M. (1973). The control of urban schools. New York: Free Press.
16.
Crowson, R. (1987). The local district superintendency: A puzzling administrative role.Educational Adminstration Quarterly, 23(3), 49-69.
17.
Cuban, L. (1976). Urban school chiefs underfire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
Cuban, L. (1984). Transforming the frog into a prince: Effective schools research, policy, and practices at the district level.Harvard Educational Review, 54(2), 129-151.
19.
Cuban, L. (1985). Conflict and leadership in the superintendency.Phi Delta Kappan, 67(1), 28-30.
20.
Cuban, L. (1988). The managerial imperative and the practice of leadership in schools. Albany: State University of New York Press.
21.
Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
22.
Danzberger, J. P., Kirst, M. W., & Usdan, M.D. (1992). Governing public schools. Washington, DC: Educational Leadership.
23.
Engel, R. (1985, March). Think you know what makes a great superintendent? Guess again.The Executive Educator, 40-41.
24.
Erickson, D. (1979). Research on educational administration: The state of the art.Educational Researcher, 8, 9-14.
25.
Feilders, J. (1982). Profile. Belmont, CA: Fearon Education.
26.
Fernandez, J. (with Underwood, J.). (1993). Tales out of school: Joseph Fernandez'crusade to rescue Amenican education. Boston: Little, Brown.
27.
For D.C. schools: A fresh start. (1991, April 17). The Washington Post, p. A20.
28.
Fullan, M. (with Stiegelbauer, S.). (1992). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
29.
Glass, T. (1992). The 1992 study of the American school superintendency. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
30.
Gordo, L., & Merl, J. (1992, September 23). Anton quits, says Board interfered. Los Angeles limes, p. Al.
31.
Grady, M., & Bryant, M. (1991, February). School board turmoil and superintendent turnover: What pushes them to the brink? The School Administrator, pp. 19-26.
32.
Graham, P. (1992). S.O.S. Sustain our schools. New York: Hill & Wang.
33.
Grusky, O. (1963). Managerial succession and organizational effectiveness.American Journal of Sociology, 69, 21-31.
34.
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1986). The social context of effective schools.American Journal of Education, 94, 328-355.
35.
Hansen, C. (1968). Danger in Washington. West Nyack, NY: Parkeer.
36.
Hunter, R. (1990, May). The big city superintendent: Up against an urban wall. The School Administrator, pp. 8-11.
37.
lannaccone, L. (1981, September). Superintendents make a difference. The School Administrator, p. 16.
38.
Immegart, G. (1988). Leadership and leader behavior. In N. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 259-278). New York: Macmillan.
39.
Jackson, B., & Cibulka, J. (1991). Leadership turnover and business mobilization: The changing political ecology of urban school systems. Politics of Education Association yearbook (pp. 71-86). New York: Taylor & Francis.
40.
Johnson, S. (1996, March 13). Turnover in the superintendency: A hazard to leadership and reform. Education Week, p. 60.
41.
Jordan, M. (1993, February 13). Big city school chiefs learn reform is not I of the 2 r's. The Washington Post, p. Al.
42.
Kirp, D. (1982). Just schools. Berkeley: SAGE Publications.
43.
Kirst, M. (1984). Who controls our schools?New York: W.H. Freeman
44.
Lieberson, S., & O'Connor, J. (1972). Leadership and organizational performance: A study of large organizations.American Journal of Sociology, 37(2), 117-130.
45.
Lutz, F., & Iannaccone, L. (Ed.). (1978). Public participation in local school districts: The dissatisfaction theory of democracy. Lexington, MA: Lexington.
46.
Lutz, F., & Parker, P. (1993). Changing jobs in the superintendency: A study of mobility and vulnerability.Planning and Changing, 24(3), 170-179.
47.
March, J. (1991, April 4). Exploration and exploitation in education.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
48.
March, J. G., & March, J. C. (1977). Almost random careers: The Wisconsin school superinten-dency, 1940-1972.Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 377-409.
49.
McCorry, J. (1978). Marcus Foster and the Oakland Public Schools: Leadership in an urban bureaucracy. Berkeley: SAGE Publications.
50.
McCurdy, J. (1992). Building better board-administrator relations. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
51.
Mintzberg, H. (1973). 7he nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.
52.
Mirel, J. (1993). The rise and fall of an urban school system: Detroit, 1907-1981. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
53.
Mirga, T. (1982, August 25). Large-district superintendencies change hands. Education Week, p.7.
54.
Murphy, J., & Hallinger, P. (1986, Summer). The superintendent as instructional leader: Findings from effective school districts.Journal of Educational Administration, 24, 213-236.
55.
Pfeffer, J., & Davis-Blake, T. (1986). Administrative succession and organizational performance: How adminstrator experience mediates the succession effect.Academy of Management Joumal, 29(1), 72-83.
56.
Pitner, N. (1988). The study of adminstrator effects and effectiveness. In N. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational adminstration (pp. 99-122). New York: Macmillan.
57.
Pitner, N., Ogawa, R. (1981). The school superintendent: A case of organizational leadership.Educational Administration Quarterly, 17(2), 45-65.
58.
Renchler, R. (1992). Urban superintendent turnover: The need for stability. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.
59.
Rist, M. (1990, December). Race and politics rip into the urban superintendency. Esxecutive Educator, p. 23.
60.
Rowley, S. (1984). School closure in Seattle: A case study of educational decisionmaking. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
61.
Scott, H. (1980). The Black school superintendent: Messiah or scapegoat?Washington, DC: Howard University Press.
62.
Smith, L., Dwyer, D., Prunty, J., & Kleine, P. (1988). Innovation and change in schooling: History, politics, and agency. New York: Falmer.
63.
Spaulding, F. (1955). School superintendents in action in five cities. Rindge, NH: Richard Smith.
64.
Spillane, R. (1994, April). Mind over management.The American School Board Journal, pp. 30-32.
65.
Starr, M. (1991, January 14). Miracle workers wanted. Newsweek, p. 40-42.
66.
Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1993). Schools make a difference: Lessons learned from a 10 year study of school effects. New York: Teachers College Press.
67.
Tyack, D., & Hansot, E. (1982). Managers of virtue. New York: Basic Books.
68.
Valverde, L., & Brown, F. (1988). Influences on leadership development among racial and ethnic minorities. New York: Macmnillan.
69.
Wallace, R. (1992, April 20-24). On exiting the superintendency: An autobiographical perspective.Paper presented at the the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
70.
Wallace, R. (1996). From vision to practice: The art of educational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
71.
Walters, L. (1991, June 13). Upheaval in Houston ushers out school chief. The Christan Science Monitor, p. 10.
72.
Wanted: School superintendents. (1992, April 8). The Washington Post, p. A22.
73.
Winerip, M. (1993, December 8). As superintendents go out the revolving door, reform efforts may go with them, a case in point. The New York Times, p. B7.
74.
Yee, G. (1996). Executive succession and organizational change in an urban school district. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
75.
Ziegler, H., Kehoe, E., & Reisman, J. (1985). City managers and school superintendents. New York: Praeger.
