Arguments about the strengths and weaknesses of traditional logical empiricist conceptions of science have figured prominently in debates over the nature and content of theories of educational administration. In this article, we briefly review some of these debates and their consequences for administrative theory, concluding that much of the dispute is misconceived owing to the widespread acceptance of foundational assumptions about knowledge justification. As an alternative, we urge the adoption of a nonfoundational, coherentist view of knowledge justification that leads to a much broader conception of science, one we think is more suitable for developing a systematic new science of administration. We conclude by outlining some consequences of our new science for postmodern developments in the field and approaches to organizational design and leadership.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anyon, J. (1994). The retreat of Marxism and socialist feminism: Postmodem and poststructural theories in education.Curriculum Inquiry, 24(2), 115-135.
Aronowitz, S. , & Giroux, H. (1991). Postmodern education: Politics, culture, and social criticism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
4.
Bass, B. M. , & Avolio, B. J. (1990). The implications of transactional and transformational leadership for individual, team, and organizational development. In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Passmore (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 4). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
5.
Bass, B. M. , & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership: A response to critics. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research: Perspectives and directions. San Diego: Academic Press.
6.
Bass, B. M. , & Avolio, B. J. (Eds.) (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Bates, R. J. (1983). Educational administration and the management of knowledge. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
8.
Bates, R. J. (1995). Critical theory of educational administration. In C. W. Evers & J. D. Chapman (Eds.), Educational administration: An Australian perspective. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
9.
Bennis, W. (1984). Transformative power and leadership. In T. J. Sergiovanni & J. E. Corbally (Eds.), Leadership and organizational culture (pp. 64-71). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
10.
Bernstein, R. J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and relativism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
11.
Bernstein, R. J. (1992). The new constellation: The ethical-political horizons of modernity! postmodernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
Bonjour, L. (1985). The structure of empirical knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
Chaitin, G. (1975). Randomness and mathematical proof.Scientific American, 232, 47-52.
14.
Cherryholmes, C. H. (1988). Power and criticism. New York: Teachers College Press.
15.
Cherryholmes, C. H. (1994). Pragmatism, poststructuralism, and socially useful theorizing.Curriculum Inquiry, 24(2), 193-215.
16.
Churchland, P. M. (1985). The ontological status of observables: In praise of superempirical virtues. In P. M. Churchland & C. A. Hooker (Eds.), Images of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
Churchland, P. M. (1988). Matter and consciousness (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
Churchland, P. M. (1989). A neurocomputational perspective: The nature of mind and the structure of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
Churchland, P. M. (1990). Simplicity as an epistemic virtue: The view from the neuronal level. In N. Rescher (Ed.), Aesthetic factors in natural science. Lanhamn, MD: University Press of America.
20.
Churchland, P. M. (1995). The engine of reason, the seat of the soul. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
Clandinin, D. J. , & Connelly, F M. (1994). Personal experience methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.
22.
Dennett, D. C. (1991). Real patterns.Journal of Philosophy, 88(1), 27-51.
Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn't this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy.Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297-324.
25.
Evers, C. W. (1990). Educating the brain.Educational Philosophy & Theory, 22(2), 65-80.
26.
Evers, C. W. (1991). Towards a coherentist theory of validity.International Journal of Educational Research, 15(6), 521-535.
27.
Evers, C. W. (1993). Hodgkinson on moral leadership.Educational Management & Administration, 21(4), 259-262.
28.
Evers, C. W. (1994). Administrative decision making as pattern processing. In F. Crowtheret al. (Eds.), The workplace in education. ACEA Yearbook 1994. Sydney: Edward Arnold.
29.
Evers, C. W. , & Lakomski, G. (1991). Knowing educational administration: Contemporary methodological controversies in educational administration research. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
30.
Evers, C. W. , & Lakomski, G. (1993a). Cognition, values, and organizational structure: Hodgkinson in perspective.Journal of Educational Administration & Foundations, 8(1), 45-57.
31.
Evers, C. W. , & Lakomski, G. (1993b). Justifying educational administration.Educational Management & Administration, 21(3), 140-152.
32.
Evers, C. W. , & Lakomski, G. (1996). Exploring educational administration. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
33.
Feyerabend, P. K. (1963). How to be a good empiricist. In B. Baumrin (Ed.), Philosophy of science: The Delaware seminar. New York: Interscience.
34.
Foster, W. (1980). Administration and the crisis in legitimacy: A review of Habermasian thought.Harvard Educational Review, 50(4), 496-505.
35.
Foster, W. (1986). Paradigms and promises. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Press.
36.
Greenfield, T. B. , & Ribbins, P. (Eds.). (1993). Greenfield on educational administration: Towards a humane science. London: Routledge.
37.
Griffiths, D. E. (1959). Administrative theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
38.
Gronn, P. C. (1993). Bewitching the led: Hodgkinson on leadership.Journal of Educational Administration & Foundations, 8(1), 29-45.
39.
Gronn, P. C. (1994). The elixir of leadership. In F Crowther, B. J. Caldwell, J. D. Chapman, G. Lakomski, & D. Oglivie (Eds.), The workplace in education (pp. 259-266). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Administration.
40.
Gronn, P. C. (1995). Greatness revisited: The current obsession with transformational leadership.Leading & Managing, 1(1), 14-28.
41.
Guba, E. G. , & Lincoln, Y S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.
42.
Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests. London: Heinemann.
43.
Hallinger, P. (1992). The evolving role of American principals: From managerial to instructional to transformational leaders.Journal of Educational Administration, 30(3), 35-49.
44.
Hallinger, P. , & Murphy, J. (1992). The evolving leadership role of the principal: International perspectives. Special issue, Journal of Educational Administration, 30(3), 3-88.
45.
Halpin, A. W. (1957). A paradigm for research on administrator training. In R. F. Campbell & R. T. Gregg (Eds.), Administrative behavior in education. New York: Harper & Row.
46.
Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Hodgkinson, C. (1978). Towards a philosophy of administration. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
48.
Hodgkinson, C. (1983). The philosophy of leadership. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
49.
Hodgkinson, C. (1991). Educational leadership: The moral art. Albany: SUNY Press.
50.
Hoy, W. K. , & Miskel, C. G. (1991). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (4th ed.). New York: Random House.
51.
Hunt, J. G. (1991). Leadership: A new synthesis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
52.
Keeves, J. P. (Ed.) (1988). Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
53.
Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54.
Lakomski, G. (Ed.) (1991a). Beyond paradigms: Coherentism and holism in educational research. Special issue, International Journal of Educational Research, 15(6).
55.
Lakomski, G. (1991b). Policy analysis: Practical reason or empirical science?International Journal of Educational Research, 15(6), 537-551.
56.
Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy within the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
57.
Leithwood, K. (1992). The move toward transformational leadership.Educational Leadership, 49(5), 8-12.
58.
Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring.Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498-518.
59.
Leithwood, K. , & Jantzi, D. (1990). Transformational leadership: How principals can help reform school cultures.School Effectiveness & Improvement, 1(4), 249-280.
60.
Leithwood, K. , & Steinbach, R. (1995). Expert problem solving: Evidence from school and district leaders. Albany: SUNY Press.
61.
Lincoln, Y S. , & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
62.
Lycan, W. G. (1988). Judgement and Justification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63.
Lycan, W. G. (Ed.) (1990). Mind and cognition: A reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
64.
MacGregor Bums, J. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
65.
McKinney, J. R. , & Garrison, J. W. (1994). Postmodemism and educational leadership: The new and improved panopticon. In S. J. Maxcy (Ed.), Postmodern school leadership: Meeting the crisis in educational administration. Westport, CT: Praeger.
66.
Maxcy, S. J. (1991). Educational leadership: A critical pragmatic perspective. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
67.
Maxcy, S. J. (Ed.) (1994). Postmodern school leadership: Meeting the crisis in educational administration. Westport, CT: Praeger.
68.
Murphy, J. , & Hallinger, P. (1992). The principalship in an era of transformation.Journal of Educational Administration, 30(3), 77-88.
69.
Popper, K. R. (1950). Indeterminism in quantum physics and in classical physics: Part II.British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1(3), 179-188.
70.
Quine, W. V. (1951). Two dogmas of empiricism.Philosophical Review, 60, 20-43.
71.
Quine, W. V. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72.
Quine, W. V. (1969). Epistemology naturalised. In W. V. Quine (Ed.), Ontological relativity and other essays. New York: Columbia University Press.
73.
Rorty, R. (1980). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
74.
Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, relativism, and truth: Philosophical papers (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75.
Rorty, R. (1992). We anti-representationalists.Radical Philosophy, 60(Spring), 40-42.
76.
Rowan, B. (1990). Commitment and control: Alternative strategies for the organizational design of schools. In Review of Research in Education, 16, 353-392.
77.
Rumelhart, D. E. , & McClelland, J. L. (Eds.) (1986). Parallel distributed processing (Vols. 1 & 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
78.
Scheurich, J. J. (1994). Social relativism: A postmodernist epistemology for educational administration. In S. J. Maxcy (Ed.), Postmodern school leadership: Meeting the crisis in educational administration. Westport, CT: Praeger.
79.
Sejnowski, T. J. , Koch, C., & Churchland, P. S. (1988). Computational neuroscience.Science, 241, 1299-1306.
80.
Sellars, W. (1963). Science, perception, and reality. New York: Roudedge & Kegan Paul.
81.
Sergiovanni, T. J. , & Corbally, J. E. (Eds.) (1984). Leadership and organizational culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
82.
Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative behavior (3rd. ed.). New York: Free Press.
83.
Simon, H. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality (Vols. 1 & 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
84.
Walker, J. C. , & Evers, C. W. (1994). Research in education: Philosophical issues. In T. Husen & N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed.). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
85.
Williams, M. (1977). Groundless belief. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
