Teaching,Learning,and School Organization: Principles of Practice and the Regularities of Schooling

Abstract

This artick sets out a way of thinking about the connection between our ideas of best practice, school organization, and policy. It develops six principles of best practice in teaching and learning: (a) the object of teaching is to nurture understanding, (b) understanding occurs in the context of specific bodies of knowkledge, (c) understanding requires the active construction of knowledge by learners, (d) understanding requires the development of basic and higher order knowledge simultaneously, (e) learners differ substantially in what they bring to understanding specific bodies of knowledge, and (f) learning is a social, as well as an individual process. These ideas of best practice connect to organization and policy through the solution of four recurring problems, or regularities, of schooling: (a) how students are grouped for purposes of instruction, (b) how teachers' work is defined vis-l-vis groups of students, (c) how content is allocated to time, and (d) how students' progress is assessed. Translating principles of best practice into organization and policy requires changing traditional solutions to these problems.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bereiter, C. , & Bird, M. (1985). Use of thinking aloud in identification and teaching of reading comprehension strategies.Cognition and Instruction, 2(2), 131-156.

Bereiter, C. , & Scardamalia M. (1987). An attainable version of high literacy: Approaches to teaching higher-order skills in reading and writing.Curriculum Inquiry, 17(1), 9-30.

Bereiter, C. , & Scadaalia,M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 362-392). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Brown, J. , Collins, A. , & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educational Researcher, 18, 3242.

California State Department of Education. (1985). Mathematics framework for California public schools. Sacramento: California State Department of Education.

Cohen, D. (1988). Teaching practice: Plus que qa change... In P. Jackson (Ed.), Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and practice (pp. 27-84). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

Cohen, D. , & Peterson, P. (1990). Effects of state-level reform of elementary mathematics curriculum on classroom practice. Final report to U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. East Lansing, MI: Center for Learning and Teaching of Elementary Subjects and National Center for Research on Teacher Education, Michigan State University.

Cuban, L. (1984). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1890-1980. New York: Longman.

Elmore, R. , & McLaughlin, M. (1988). Steady work. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.

10.

Elmore, R. , Sykes, G. , & Spillane, J. (1991). Curriculum policy. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook on curriculum L New York: Macmillan.

11.

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

12.

Gardner, H. (1987). An individual-centered curriculum.Paper prepared for the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education.

13.

Glaser, R. (1984). Education and thinking: The role of knowledge.American Psychologist, 39, 93-104.

14.

Palincsar, A. M. , & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities.Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.

15.

Putnam, R. , Lampert, M. , & Peterson, P. (1990). Alternative perspectives on knowing mathematics in elementary schools. In C. Cazden (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 16, pp. 57-150). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

16.

Resnick, L. (1986). The development of mathematical intuition. In M. Perlmutter (Ed.), Perspectives on intellectual development: The Minnesota symposium on child development (Vol. 19, pp. 159-194). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

17.

Resnick, L. (1987a). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

18.

Resnick, L. (1987b). Learning in and out of school.Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13-20.

19.

Resnick, L. , & Neches, R. (1984). Factors affecting individual differences in learning ability. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.),Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 275-323). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

20.

Tyack, D. (1991). "Restructuring" in historical perspective: Tinkering toward utopia. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.