Although the micropolitics of educational settings has received significant attention in recent years, few empirical studies of this important phenomenon have been published. The data discussed in this article were drawn from a larger qualitative study that examined the perspectives of 1,200 teachers on the everyday strategies school principals use to influence them. This article focuses on the responses of the 836 teachers who specifically reported strategies used by principals whom they described as open and effective. The goals and impacts of strategies employed by open and effective principals are only briefly discussed. The data strongly suggest that open and effective principals rely primarily on normative strategies and pursue normative goals. The concept of normative-instrumental leadership, derived from the data, delineates open and effective principals' everyday political orientation vis-à-vis teachers. This concept is examined in the context of compliance theory and the notion of transformational leadership.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allport, G. (1942). The use of personal documents in psychological science. New York: Social Science Research Council.
2.
Anderson, G. (1991). Cognitive politics of principals and teachers: Ideological control in an elementary school. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation (pp. 120-138). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Bacharach, S. B. , & Lawler, E. L. (1980). Power and politics in organizations: The social psychology of conflict, coalitions, and bargaining. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
Ball, S. J. (1987). The micro-politics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization. London: Methuen.
5.
Ball, S. , & Bowe, R. (1991). Micropolitics of radical change: Budgets, management, and control in British schools. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation (pp. 19-45). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
Bates, R. (1986, April). The culture of administration, the process of schooling and the politics of culture. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
7.
Bennis, W. , & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper & Row.
8.
Bidwell, C. (1965). The school as a formal organization. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 972-1021). Chicago: Rand McNally.
9.
Blase, J. (1986). A qualitative analysis of sources of teacher stress: Consequences for performance. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 13-40.
10.
Blase, J. (1987). Dimensions of effective school leadership: The teachers' perspective. AmericanEducational Research Journal, 24, 598-610.
11.
Blase, J. (1988a). The everyday political perspectives of teachers: Vulnerability and conserva-tism. Qualitative Studies in Education, 1(2), 125-142.
12.
Blase, J. (1988b). The politics of favoritism: A qualitative analysis of the teachers' perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 24, 152-177.
13.
Blase, J. (1990). Some negative effects of principals' control-oriented and protective political behavior. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 727-753.
14.
Blase, J. (Ed.). (1991). The politics of life in schools: Power; conflict, and cooperation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
Blumberg, A. , & Greenfield, W. (1986). The effective principal: Perspectives on school leadership (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
16.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
17.
Bogdan, R. , & Taylor, S. (1975). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A phenomenological approach to the social sciences. New York: Wiley.
18.
Brady, L. (1985). The supportiveness of the principal in school-based curriculum development. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17(1), 95-97.
19.
Bredeson, P. V. (1986, April). Principally speaking: An analysis of the interpersonal communications of school principals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
20.
Burns, J. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
21.
Burns, T. (1961). Micropolitics: Mechanisms of institutional change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6, 257-281.
22.
Chubb, J. E. , & Moe, T. M. (1986). No school is an island: Politics, markets, and education. Brookings Review, 4(4), 21-28.
23.
Deal, T. , & Kennedy, A. (1984). Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
24.
Dreeben, R. (1968). On what is learned in school. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
25.
Etzioni, A. (1961). A comparative analysis of complex organizations. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
26.
Etzioni, A. (1975). A comparative analysis of complex organizations (rev. ed.). New York: Macmillan.
27.
Firestone, W. A. , & Wilson, B. L. (1985). Using bureaucratic and cultural linkages to improve instruction: The principal's contribution. Educational Administration Quarterly, 21(2),7-30.
28.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
29.
Glaser, B. G. , & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
30.
Greenfield, W. (1991). The micropolitics of leadership in an urban elementary school. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation (pp. 161-184). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
Hamilton, G. G. , & Biggart, N. W. (1985). Why people obey: Theoretical observations on power and obedience in complex organizations. Sociological Perspectives, 28(1), 3-28.
32.
Hanson, M. (1976). Beyond the bureaucratic model: A study of power and autonomy in educational decisionmaking. Interchange, 7(1), 27-38.
33.
Hargreaves, A. (1991). Contrived collegiality: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation (pp. 46-72). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
Henderson, A. H. (1981). Social power: Social psychological models and theories. New York: Praeger.
35.
High, R. , & Achilles, C. M. (1986). An analysis of influence-gaining behaviors of principals in schools of varying levels of instructional effectiveness. Educational Administraion Quarterly, 22(1), 111-119.
36.
Hoy, W. K. , & Brown, B. L. (1986, April). Leadership of principals, personal characteristics of teachers, and the professional zone of acceptance of elementary teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
37.
Hoy, W. K. , & Brown, B. L. (1988). Leadership behavior of principals and the zone of acceptance of elementary teachers. Journal of Educational Administration, 26(1), 22-38.
38.
Hoyle, E. (1986). The politics of school management. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
39.
Isherwood, G. B. (1973). The principal and his authority: An empirical study. High School Journal, 56, 291-303.
40.
Jackson, P. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
41.
Johnson, N. A. (1984). The role of the Australian school principal in staff development. Unpublished master's thesis, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales.
42.
Johnston, G. S. , & Venable, B. P. (1986). A study of teacher loyalty to the principal: Rule administration and hierarchical influence of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22(4), 4-27.
43.
Kipnis, D. (1976). The powerholders. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
Kipnis, D. , Schmidt, S., & Wilkinson, I. (1980). Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one's way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(4), 440-452.
45.
Leithwood, K. , & Jantzi, D. (1990, April). Transformational leadership: How principals can help reform school cultures. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
46.
Lipsky, M. (1982). Street level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
47.
Lofland, J. (1976). Doing social life: The qualitative study of human interaction in natural settings. New York: Wiley.
48.
Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
Mangham, I. (1979). The politics of organizational change. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
50.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51.
Miles, M. B. , & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
52.
National Education Association . (1983). The national teacher opinion poll [Research memo]. Washington, DC: Author.
53.
National Education Association . (1990). Estimates of school statistics. West Haven, CT: Author.
54.
Pajak, E. , & Blase, J. (1989). The impact of teachers' personal lives on professional role enactment. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 283-310.
55.
Pettigrew, A. (1973). The politics of organizational decision-making. London: Tavistock.
56.
Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
57.
Ross, J. A. (1980). The influence of the principal on curriculum decisions of teachers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 12, 219-230.
58.
Schlechty, P. C. (1990). Schools for the twenty-first century: Leadership imperatives for educational reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
59.
Shakeshaft, C. (1987). Women in educational administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
60.
Smith, J. K. , & Blase, J. (1991). From empiricism to hermeneutics: Leadership as a practical and moral activity. Journal of Educational Administration, 29(1), 6-21.
61.
Smylie, M. , & Brownlee-Conyers, J. (1990, April). Teacher leaders and their principals: Exploring new working relationships from a micropolitical perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
62.
Sparks, A. C. (1988). The micropolitics of innovation in the physical education curriculum. In J. Evans (Ed.), Teacher, teaching and control in physical education (pp. 157-177). Lewes, England: Falmer.
63.
Sparks, A. C. (1990). Power, domination and resistance in the process of teacher-initiated innovation. Research Papers in Education, 5(2), 153-178.
64.
Strauss, G. (1962). Tactics of lateral relationship: The purchasing agent. Administrative Science Quarterly, 7, 161-186.
65.
Tesch, R. (1988, April). The contribution of a qualitative method: Phenomenological research. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
66.
Treslan, D. L. , & Ryan, J. J. (1986). Perceptions of principals' influence bases. Canadian Administrator, 26(2), 1-7.
67.
Waller, W. (1932). The sociology of teaching. New York: Wiley.
68.
Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1-18.
69.
Winter, D. G. (1973). The power motive. New York: Free Press.
70.
Wynne, E. A. (1987, April). Schools as morally governed institutions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Washington, DC.
