In response to Burbules's article "Making a Case for Relevance, " this article argues that Burbules confuses matters of relevance with the question of the communication of relevance and that he fails to distinguish between authoritative and authoritarian positions. The article also analyzes the sense in which Burbules's position is positivist and explains the role of philosophy in a liberal theory of educational administration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adorno, T. W. (1973). Negative dialectics. London: Routtedge & Kegan Paul.
2.
Adomo, T. W. (1976) Sociology and empirical research. In T. W. Adomo, H. Albert, R. Dahrendorf, J. Habermas, H. Pilot, & K. R. Popper (Eds.), The positivist dispute in German sociology (pp. 68-86). London: Heinemann.
3.
Broudy, H. S. (1981). Between the yearbooks. In J. F. Soltis (Ed.), Philosophy and education: Eightieth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 13-35). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Burbules, N. C. (1989). Issues and trends in philosophy of education. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25, 229-252.
5.
Burbules, N. C. (1990). Making a case for relevance. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26, 293-301.
6.
Frisby, D. (1976). Introduction to the English translation. In T. W. Adomo, H. Albert, R. Dahrendorf, J. Habermas, H. Pilot, & K. R. Popper (Eds.), The positivist dispute in German sociology. (pp. ix-xliv). London: Heinemann.
7.
Gottner, H. (1976). Analysis of the problem of relevance in the study of literature. Poetics, 5, 35-56.
8.
Greenfield, T. B. (1986). The decline and fall of science in educational administration. Interchange, 17, 57-80.
9.
Habermas, J. (1975). Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon.
10.
Habermas, J. (1976). A positivistically bisected rationalism. In T. W. Adorno, H. Albert, R. Dahrendorf, J. Habermas, H. Pilot, & K. R. Popper (Eds.), The positivist dispute in German sociology (pp. 198-225). London: Heinemann.
11.
Hirst, P. H. (1973). Liberal education and the nature of knowledge. In R. S. Peters (Ed.), The philosophy of education (pp. 87-111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
Hirst, P. H. , & Peters, R. S. (1970). The logic of education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
13.
Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
Lakomski, G. (1985). Theory, value and relevance in educational administration. In F. Rizvi (Ed.), Working papers in ethics and educational administration (pp. 35-64). Geelong, Melbourne: Deakin University Press.
15.
Maddock, T. H. (1990). The relevance of philosophy to educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26, 280-292.
16.
Peters, R. S. (1970). Ethics and education. London: Allen & Unwin.
17.
Phillips, D. C. (1983). Philosophy of education: In extremis?Educational Studies, 14, 1-30.
18.
Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
19.
Popper, K. (1965). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Basic Books.
20.
Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon.
21.
Quine, W.V.O. (1981). Theories and things. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
22.
Rorty, R. (1982). The consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
23.
Scheffler, 1. (1984). The education of policy-makers.-HarvardEducation Review, 54, 152-165.
24.
Siegel, H. (1983). On the obligations of the professional philosopher of education. Journal of Thought, 18, 31-37.
25.
Soltis, J. F. (1983). Perspectives on the philosophy of education. Journal of Thought, 18, 14-21.
26.
Stegmuller, W. (1969). Main currents in contemporary German, British and American philosophy. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.
27.
Stegmuller, W. (1976). The structure and dynamics of theories. New York: Springer.
28.
Waks, L. (1988). Three contexts of philosophy of education: Intellectual, institutional, and ideological. Educational Theory, 38, 167-174.
29.
Walker, J. C. (1987). Materialism and the growth of knowledge in education. In C. Evers (Ed.), Moral theory for educative leadership (pp. 51-71). Melbourne, Australia: Ministry of Education.
30.
Walker, J. C. , & Evers, C. (1984). Towards a materialist pragmatist philosophy of education. Educational Research and Perspectives, 11, 23-33.
31.
Willower, D. J. (1986). Review of F. Rizvi (Ed.), Working papers in ethics and educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22, 133-143.
32.
Woods, R. G. , & Barrow, R.St.C. (1975). An introduction to the philosophy of education. London: Methuen.
