This study examines faculty motivation and quantitative performance in the research function. Beginning with industrial theory, factor analysis is used to characterize individual motivations to work in terms of distinctive sets of goals sought from employment. These bases of motivation (or 'work attachments) are surprisingly comparable to the range of attachments found in industry: Moral, Calculative and Alienative. Regression analysis indicates that Moral and Alienative attachments make an appreciable contribution to the explanation of research productivity. The results of this exploratory study suggest that further research should be undertaken to consider the manner in which faculty make sense of their situations and develop goals from work. There is also a need to study the relationship between work attachments and performance in other academic functions. Finally, it is suggested that the implications of research on work attachments be considered in relation to work design, compensation and development activities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Astin, H. S. (1984). Academic scholarship and its rewards. In M. L. Maehr & M. W. Steinkamp (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement, Vol. 2. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
2.
Astin, H. S. (1985). The meaning of work in women's lives: A sociopsychological model of career choice and work behavior. Counseling Psychologist, 12(4), 117-126.
3.
Begin, J. P. , Settle, T. C., & Alexander, P. B. (1976). The emergence of faculty bargaining. In T. N. Rice (Ed.), Campus employment relations. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute of Continuing Legal Education.
4.
Bennett, R. (1978). Orientation to work and organizational analysis: A conceptual analysis, integration and suggested application. Journal of Management Studies, 15, 187-210.
5.
Berger, C. J. , & Cummings, L. L. (1979). Organizational structure, attitudes, and behaviors. In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
6.
Betcherman, G. , & Rebne, D. S. (1987). Technology and control of the labor process: Fifty years of longshoring on the U.S. West Coast. In D. Cornfleld (Ed.), Workers, managers and technological change: Emerging patterns of labor relations (pp. 73-89). New York: Plenum.
7.
Biglan, A. (1973a). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195-203.
8.
Biglan, A. (1973b). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 204-213.
9.
Blackburn, R. M. , & Mann, M. (1979). The working class in the labor market. London: Heinemann.
10.
Blackburn, R. T. , Behymer, C. E., & Hall, D. E. (1978). Correlates of faculty publications. Sociology of Education, 51, 132-141.
11.
Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 533-546.
12.
Clark, S. M. , & Corcoran, M. (1986). Perspectives on the professional socialization of women: A case of accumulative disadvantage?Journal of Higher Education, 57(1), 40-42.
13.
Cole, J. R. (1979). Fair science: Women in the scientific community. New York: Free Press.
14.
Cole, J. R. , & Cole, S. (1973). Social stratification in science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Creswell, J. W. (1985). Faculty research performance: Lessons from the sciences and the social sciences (Report No. 4). Washington, DC: ASHE-ERIC.
16.
Creswell, J. W. , & Bean, J. P. (1981). Research output, socialization and the Biglan model. Research in Higher Education, 15(1), 69-91.
17.
Daniel, W. W. (1969). Industrial behavior and orientation to work: A critique. Journal of Management Studies, 6(3), 36-40.
18.
Dubin, R. , Champoux, J. E., & Porter, L. W. (1975). Central life interests and organizational commitment of blue-collar and clerical workers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 411-421.
19.
Etzioni, A. (1961). A comparative analysis of complex organizations. New York: Free Press.
20.
Finkelstein, M. (1984). The American academic profession: A synthesis of social scientific inquiry since World War II. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
21.
Fox, M. F. (1983). Publication productivity among scientists: A critical review. Social Studies of Science, 13, 285-305.
22.
Friedrich, R. J. , & Michalak, S. J., Jr. (1983). Why doesn't research improve teaching? Some answers from a small liberal arts college. Journal of Higher Education, 54(2), 145-163.
23.
Gaston, J. (1978). The reward system in British and American science. New York: John Wiley.
24.
Goldthorpe, J. H. , Lockwood, D., Bechhofer, F., & Platt, J. (1968). The affluent worker: Industrial attitudes and behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Harman, H. H. (1967). Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Helmreich, R. L. , Spence, J. T., Beane, W. E., Lucker, G., & Matthews, K. A. (1980). Making it in academic psychology: Demographic and personality correlates of attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 898-908.
27.
Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. New York: Thomas Crowell.
28.
Hill, S. (1981). Competition and control at work: The new industrial sociology. London: Heinemann.
29.
Ingham, G. (1967). Organizational size, orientation to work and industrial behavior. Sociology, 1, 239-258.
30.
Jacobi, M. , & Astin, H. S. (1985). Career patterns of academics: Differences in age, gender and social cohort. Unpublished manuscript, UCLA, Higher Education Research Institute, Los Angeles.
31.
Kaiser, H. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187-200.
32.
Lawler, E. E., III (1973). Motivation in work organizations. Belmont, CA: Brooks/ Cole.
33.
Lawler, E. E., III , & Porter, L. W. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Homewood, IL: Irwin-Dorsey.
34.
Lawler, J. J. , & Walker, J. M. (1980). Interaction of efficacy, commitment, and expectations in the formation of faculty attitudes towards collective bargaining. Research in Higher Education, 13, 99-114.
35.
Lodahl, J. B. , & Gordon, G. (1972). The structure of scientific fields and the functioning of university graduate departments. American Sociological Review, 37, 57-72.
36.
Long, J. S. (1978). Productivity and academic position in the scientific career. American Sociological Review, 43, 889-908.
37.
Long, J. S. , & McGinnis, R. (1981). Organizational context and scientific productivity. American Sociological Review, 46, 422-442.
38.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50,370-396.
39.
McKeachie, W. J. (1969). Perspectives from psychology: Financial incentives are ineffective for faculty. In D. R. Lewis & W. E. Becker (Eds.), Academic rewards in higher education (pp. 3-20). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
40.
Merton, R. (1973). The sociology of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41.
Mowday, R. T. , Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic Press.
42.
Norsworthy, J. R. , & Zabala, C. A. (1985). Responding to the productivity crisis: A plant-level approach to labor policy. In W. Baumol & K. McLennan (Eds.), Productivity growth and U.S. competitiveness (pp. 103-119). New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
O'Connell, C. (1983). College policies off-target in fostering faculty development. Journal of Higher Education, 54(6), 662-675.
44.
Peters, T. S. , & Waterman, R. H., Jr. (1982). In search of excellence. New York: Harper & Row.
45.
Rebne, D. S. (1988). Determinants of individual productivity: The case of academic research. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, UCLA, Anderson Graduate School of Management.
46.
Reskin, B. F. (1978). Scientific productivity, sex, and location in the institution of science. American Sociological Review, 83, 1235-1243.
47.
Salancik, G. R. , & Pfeffer, J. (1977). An examination of need-satisfaction models of job attitudes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 83, 427-256.
48.
Silverman, D. (1970). The theory of organization. London: Heinemann.
49.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.
50.
Smart, J. C. , & Morstain, B. R. (1975). Assessment of job satisfaction among college administrators. Research in Higher Education, 3, 1-19.
51.
Staw, B. M. (1977). Motivation in organizations: Toward synthesis and redirection. In B. M. Staw & G. R. Salancik (Eds.), New Directions in Organizational Behavior (pp. 55-95). Chicago: St. Clair.
52.
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: John Wiley.
53.
Wanous, J. (1983). Organizational entry: The individual's viewpoint. In R. Steers & L. Porter (Eds.), Motivation and work behavior (pp. 431-441). New York: McGraw-Hill.
54.
Weber, M. (1964). The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Free Press.
55.
Wynn, P. S. (1980). Motivation, orientations and the action perspective: An alternative framework. Journal of Management Studies, 17(3), 251-260.
56.
Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. New York: Free Press.
