Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study, using stepwise multiple regression analysis, examined the presence of leader substitutes in educational organizations, the relationship between leader substitutes, department head leader behaviors, and teacher-perceived organizational commitment, role ambiguity, and role conflict. Into this study, I incorporated the variables, design, methodology, instrumentation, and data analysis procedures developed by Kerr and Jermier (1978). Generally, leader substitutes, not leader behaviors, were identifled by teachers as having significant relationships to the criterion variables of organizational commitment and role ambiguity. Both leader substitutes and leader behavior weresignificant predictor variables with role conflict.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blake, R. , & Mouton, J. (1964). The managerial grid. Houston: Gulf.

Fleishman, E. , & Peters, D. (1962) Interpersonal values, leadership attitudes and managerial success. Personnel Psychology, 15, 127-143.

Ford, J. (1981). Departmental context and formal structure as constraints on leader behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 274-288.

Halpin, A. (1956). The leadership behavior of school superintendents. Chicago: Midwest Administration Center, University of Chicago.

Howell, J. , & Dorfman, P. (1981). Substitutes for leadership: Test of a construct. Academy of Management Journal, 4, 714-728.

Kerlinger, F. (1973). Foundations of behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Kerr, S. , & Jermier, J. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 375 403.

Naisbitt, J. (1982). Megatrends. New York: Warner.

Nie, N. , Hull, C. , Jenkins, J. , Steinbrenner, K. , & Bent, D. (1975). Statistical package for the social sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.

10.

Pitner, N. (1986). Substitutes for principal behavior: An exploratory study. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22(2), 2342.

11.

Porter, L. Steers, R. , Mowday, R. , & Boulian, P. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 603-609.

12.

Rizzo, J. , House, R. , & Lirtzman, S. (1970). Role conflict and role ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 150-163.

13.

Schuler, R. Aldag, R. , & Brief, A. (1977). Role conflict and ambiguity: A scale analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20, 111-128.

14.

Schwab, R. L. Iwanicki, E. F. , & Pierson, D. A. (1982). Assessing role conflict and role ambiguity: A cross validation study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 587-593.

Leader Substitutes in Educational Organizations

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References