Dollars for Schools: The Reinforcement of Inequality

Abstract

The authors contend that children from lower socio-economic status homes are systematically discriminated against in the delivery of school services. Data from Michigan are employed to demonstrate that state aid equilization arrangements not only do not alleviate this discrimination, but, in fact, actually tend to reinforce it. James W. Guthrie is an Assistant Professor and Director of the Urban Education Program at the University of California, Berkeley; George B. Kleindorfer is a Lecturer in the School of Education, University of California, Berkeley and a Consultant to the Ford Foundation on matters related to quantitative analysis: Henry M. Levin is an Associate Professor in the School of Education and a member of the associated faculty of economics at Stanford University; and Robert T. Stout is an Associate Professor at the Clairmont Graduate School and the Coordinator of the Ford Foundation-funded Administrator Training Program at that institution.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Charles S. Benson , "State Aid Patterns," in Jesse Burkhead, Public School Finance ( Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1964).

Charles S. Benson , The Cheerful Prospect (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1965).

Charles S. Benson , The Economics of Public Education (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, Second Edition, 1968).

James S. Coleman , "The Concept of Equality of Educational Opportunity," Harvard Educational Review, Vol. 38, No. 1 (Winter 1968).

James Bryant Conant , Slums and Suburbs (New York: McGraw Hill, Inc., 1961).

Ellwood P. Cubberley , School Funds and Their Apportionment (New York: Columbia University, 1905).

John W. Gardner , Excellence (New York: Harper and Row, 1961).

James W. Guthrie, et al ., Schools and Inequality ( Washington: The Urban Coalition, 1969).

James W. Guthrie and Stephen B. Lawton , "The Distribution of Federal School Aid Funds: Who Wins? Who Loses?" Educational Administration Quarterly (Winter 1970).

10.

Charles E. Hansen , "Central City and Suburb: A Study of Educational Opportunity" (unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1969).

11.

H. Thomas James , James A. Kelly and Walter I. Garms , Determinants of Educational Expenditures in Large Cities of the United States (Stanford: Stanford University, School of Education, 1966).

12.

Johnson. I.T. , "An Evaluation of NDEA Title III," Phi Delta Kappan , XLVIII, No. 10(June 1967).

13.

Kahl. J.A. , The American Class Structure (New York: Rinehart and Co., Inc., 1959).

14.

Kendall. M.G. , Rank Correlation Methods (London: Charles Griffin and Co., Ltd., 1948).

15.

William J. McCormick , "Students' Social Status and School Staff Characteristics" (unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1970).

16.

Michigan Department of Education , Ranking of Michigan High School Districts by Selected Financial Data, 1966-67, Bulletin No. 1012 (Lansing: State Board of Education, 1967).

17.

Michigan Department of Education , Ranking of Michigan Public High School Districts by Selected Financial Data, 1967-68, Bulletin No. 1012 (Lansing: State Board of Education, December 1968).

18.

Patricia Cayo Sexton , Education and Income (New York: The Viking Press, 1964).

19.

S. Siegal , Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences ( New York: McGraw Hill, 1956).

20.

Kenneth B. Simon and Vance W. Grant , Digest of Educational Statistics (Washington: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1967).

21.

J. Alan Thomas , School Finance and Educational Opportunity in Michigan ( Lansing: Michigan Department of Education, 1968).

22.

Willard Waller , The Sociology of Teaching (New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., reprinted in 1965).

23.

William Lloyd Warner, Robert J. Havighurst, and Martin B. Loeb , Who Shall be Educated? (New York: Harper and Bros., 1944).