Purpose: There is little consensus in the literature regarding a) what it means for a school leader to lead with data, and b) how to measure data-informed leadership in a reliable and valid way. This study examines the psychometric properties of an operational measure intended to assess the extent to which a school leader is a ‘data-informed school leader. The measurement invariance, reliabilities and construct and predictive validities of the Data-Informed School Leadership Survey (DISL Survey) are assessed using various psychometric statistical techniques. Methods: Using data collected from 155 teachers from 7 public schools in a southern state, the following psychometric statistics used to address our purpose: the Many-Facet Rasch (MFR) Model, Bayesian second-order Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling- Multiple Indicators, Multiple Causes analysis (Bayesian SEM-MIMIC), and reliability analysis. Findings: Results show an adequate fit from all MFR, Bayesian CFA, and MIMIC models and a high reliability (Cronbach α = .98). The DISL Survey instrument exhibits sound psychometric properties. Results likewise confirm the value of using MFR modeling and Bayesian methods to examine the psychometric properties of DISL Survey as a means of improving educational leadership measures. Implications for Research and Practice: Data from this study confirm the validity and reliability of the Data-Informed School Leadership Survey (DISL Survey) as an instrument to assess the strengths and weaknesses of Data-Informed School Leadership (DISL) and as a means for providing feedback for improving such leadership. Heretofore a measure for assessing this leadership was non-existent.
AndersonS.LeithwoodK.StraussT. (2010). Leading data use in schools: Organizational conditions and practices at the school and district levels. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(3), 292–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700761003731492
AnsyariM. F.GrootW.De WitteK. (2022). A systematic review and meta-analysis of data use professional development interventions. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 7(3), 256–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpcc-09-2021-0055
4.
ArmstrongJ.AnthesK. (2001). How data can help. American School Board Journal, 188(11), 38–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/abcde
BowersA. J.ShohoA. R.BarnettB. G. (Eds.). (2014). Using data in schools to inform leadership and decision making. Information Age Publishing.
11.
BresinaB. C.McMasterK. L. (2020). Exploring the relation between teacher factors and student growth in early writing. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(4), 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420913543
12.
BrownT. A. (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
13.
CarbonariM.DavisonM.DeArmondM.DeweyD.Dizon-RossE.GoldhaberD.HashimA.KaneT.McEachinA.MortonE.PattersonT.StaigerD. (2022). The Challenges of Implementing Academic COVID Recovery Interventions: Evidence From the Road to Recovery Project. Research Report. Center for Education Policy Research, Harvard University.
14.
ChambersR. (2017). Can we know better? Reflections for development. Practical Action Publishing. https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780449449
15.
ChitwoodN. R. (2018). The Effectiveness of Leadership Behaviors in Influencing Data-Driven Decision-Making by Teachers. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2jn7d5gd.
16.
ChoV.WaymanJ. C. (2014). Districts’ efforts for data use and computer data systems: The role of sensemaking in system use and implementation. Teachers College Record, 116(2), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411600203
17.
ColemanJ. S.HobsonC. J.McPartlandJ.MoodA. M.WeinfeldF. D.YorkR. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.
DatnowA.HubbardL. (2015). Teacher capacity for and beliefs about data-driven decision making: A literature review of international research. Journal of Educational Change, 17(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9264-2
DatnowA.ParkV.WohlstetterP. (2007). Achieving with data: How high-performing elementary systems use data to improve student achievement. Center on Educational Governance, University of Southern California.
22.
DayC. (2022). ISSPP (International Successful School Principalship Project) 2022 Booklet. University of Nottingham.
23.
DayC.GuQ. (2018). Leading teachers’ development: Capacity building and values. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(3), 309–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18761341
24.
DeikeM. A. (2009). The principal as an instructional leader within the context of effective data use(Publication No. 305005467) [Ed.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
25.
DoğanE.DemirbolatA. O. (2016). Data-driven decision-making in schools: A study of validity and reliability. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 13(1), 507–523.
26.
DrostE. A. (2011). Validity and reliability in social science research. Education Research and Perspectives, 38(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.3316/eric.EJ942587
EarlL.KatzS. (2002). Leading schools in a data-rich world. In LeithwoodK.HallingerP. (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 1003–1022). Kluwer Academic.
29.
EdwardsF.OgleD. (2021). Data informed leadership: The work of primary mathematics lead teachers in New Zealand. Teacher Development, 25(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2020.1837217
30.
EngelhardG.JrMyfordC. M. (2003). Monitoring faculty consultant performance in the advanced placement English literature and composition program with a many-faceted Rasch model. ETS Research Report Series, 2003(1), i–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2003.tb01893.x
31.
EngelhardG.WindS. A. (2018). Invariant measurement with raters and rating scales: Rasch models for rater-mediated assessments. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
32.
Eubank MorrisC. E. (2017). Toward assessment leadership: study of assessment practices among school and classroom leaders[Doctoral dissertation, The University of Kentucky]. Theses and Dissertations–Education Science, 30. https://doi.org/10.13023/ETD.2017.462.
33.
EzzaniM. D. (2020). Principal and teacher instructional leadership: A cultural shift. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(3), 576–585. https://doi.org/https://doi-org.libdata.lib.ua.edu/10.1108/IJEM-02-2019-0071
34.
Farley-RippleE. N.ButtramJ. L. (2014). Developing collaborative data use through professional learning communities: Early lessons from Delaware. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.09.006
35.
FischerB. E. (2011). Using data to increase student achievement: A case study of success in a sanctioned school(Publication No. 873812798) [Ed.D. dissertation, The University of Minnesota]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
36.
FixE.HodgesJ. L. (1951). Discriminatory analysis. Nonparametric discrimination: Consistency properties. USAF School of Aviation Medicine.
37.
FrenzelA. C.PekrunR.GoetzT.DanielsL. M.DurksenT. L.Becker-KurzB.KlassenR. M. (2016). Measuring teachers’ enjoyment, anger, and anxiety: The teacher emotions scales (TES). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 148–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.05.003
38.
FullanM. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
GelmanA.CarlinJ. B.SternH. S.DunsonD. B.VehtariA.RubinD. B. (2013). Bayesian data analysis (3rd ed.). CRC Press.
42.
GelmanA.CarlinJ. B.SternH. S.RubinD. B. (2004). Bayesian data analysis (2nd ed.). Chapman & Hall.
43.
GleasonP.CrisseyS.ChojnackiG.ZukiewiczM.SilvaT.CostelloeS.O'ReillyF. (2019). Evaluation of Support for Using Student Data to Inform Teachers’ Instruction. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED598641.pdf
44.
GodreauC. K. L. (2011). A middle school principal's and teachers’ perceptions of leadership practices in data-driven decision making.(Publication No. 851186662) [Ed.D. dissertation, The University of Hartford]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
45.
HallingerP. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764032000122005
46.
HallingerP. (2011). A review of three decades of doctoral studies using the principal instructional management rating scale: A lens on methodological progress in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(2). 271–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X10383412
HalversonR.GriggJ.PrichettR.ThomasC. (2006). The new instructional leadership: Creating data-driven instructional systems in school. Journal of School Leadership, 16(5), 455–482.
49.
HalversonR.GriggJ.PrichettR.ThomasC. (2011). The design of data-driven leadership programs in education. Journal of Educational Change, 12(3), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-011-9150-4
50.
HamiltonL.HalversonR.JacksonS. S.MandinachE.SupovitzJ. A.WaymanJ. C. (2009). Using student achievement data to support instructional decision making. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/dddm_pg_092909.pdf
51.
HattieJ. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
HenryS. S. (2011). Principals' use of assessment data to drive student academic achievement. (Publication No. 912193587) [Ed.D. dissertation, California State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
54.
HillK. L. (2010). Predictive indicators of high performing schools: A study of evaluative inquiry and the effective use of achievement test data.(Publication No. 610058860) [Ph. D. dissertation, The University of Minnesota] ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
55.
HittD. H.TuckerP. D. (2016). Systematic review of key leader practices found to influence student achievement: A unified framework. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 531–569. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315614911
56.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
IkemotoG. S.MarshJ. A. (2007). Cutting through the “data-driven” mantra: Different conceptions of data-driven decision making. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 109(13), 105–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810710901310
59.
JimersonJ. B. (2014). Thinking about data: Exploring the development of mental models for “data use” among teachers and school leaders. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 42, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.010
60.
JohnsonC. (2006). Situated cognition and knowledge: Perspectives and implications for learning, teaching, and assessment. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4103_3
61.
JohnsonA. (2020). The impact of English learner reclassification on high school Reading and academic progress. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373719877197
62.
JohnsonC.KruseS. (2009). Decision making for educational leaders: Underexamined dimensions and issues. State University of New York Press.
63.
KennyS. E. (2015). Measuring model fit in Bayesian confirmatory factor analysis. Bayesian Analysis, 10(4), 879–899.
KennyD. A.McCoachD. B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 333–3511. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1003_1
66.
KerrK. A.MarshJ. A.IkemotoG. S.DarilekH.BarneyH. (2006). Strategies to promote data use of instructional improvement: Actions, outcomes, and lessons from three urban districts. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 496–520. https://doi.org/10.1086/505057
67.
KlineR. B. (2020). Becoming a Behavioral Science Researcher: A Guide to Producing Research That Matters. The Guilford Publications.
68.
KnappM. S.SwinnertonJ. A. (2009a). Instructional leadership at the crossroads: Mobilizing knowledge about student performance. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 108(1), 64–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7984.2009.01150.x
69.
KnappM. S.SwinnertonJ. A.CoplandM. A.Monpas-HuberJ. (2009b). Data-informed leadership in education. In M. S. Knapp, J. A. Swinnerton, S. E. Copland, & A. M. Monpas-Huber (Eds.), Data-informed leadership in education. University of Washington Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
70.
KowalskiT. J.LasleyT. J.MahoneyJ. W. (2008). Data-driven decisions and school leadership: best practices for school improvement. Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
71.
KwanP. (2019). Is transformational leadership theory passé? Revisiting the integrative effect of instructional leadership and transformational leadership on student outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(2), 321–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X19861137
72.
LachatM. A.SmithS. (2005). Practices that support data use in urban high schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10(3), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327671espr1003_7
LeeS. Y.SongX. Y. (2004). Evaluation of the Bayesian and maximum likelihood approaches in analyzing structural equation models with small sample sizes. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(4), 653–686. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3904_4
75.
LeithwoodK. (2012). The Ontario leadership framework 2012: With a discussion of the research foundations. Ontario Institute for Education Leadership.
76.
LeithwoodK. (2017). Transformational School Leadership Survey. Leithwood Associates Ltd. Markham.
LeithwoodK.PattenS.JantziD. (2010b). Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 671–706. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x10377347
83.
LeithwoodK.Seashore LouisK.AndersonS.WahlstromK. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. The Wallace Foundation.
84.
LeithwoodK.SunJ.-P.SchumackerR. (2020b). How school leadership influences student learning: A test of “the four paths model”. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(4), 570–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X19878772
85.
LeithwoodK.SunJ.-P.SchumackerR.HuaC. (2023). Psychometric properties of the successful school leadership survey. Journal of Educational Administration, 61(4), 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-08-2022-0115
86.
LeithwoodK.SunJ.- P.ZhangS.- J.HuaC. (2024). Examining the psychometric properties of an instrument measuring a new construct: Academic culture. Journal of School Leadership. Published online. https://doi.org/10.1177/10526846241258199
LinacreJ. M. (2022). Facets computer program for many-facet Rasch measurement (version 3.84.0). Winsteps.com.
89.
LiuY.BellibaşMŞGümüşS. (2020). The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 430–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220910438
90.
LocktonM.WeddleH.DatnowA. (2020). When data don't drive: Teacher agency in data use efforts in low-performing schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(2), 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2019.1647442
91.
LuoM. (2005). An empirical study of high school principals' data-driven decision-making practices and their relationships to contextual variables [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Nebraska at Omaha. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork/3432
92.
MakaravageR. J. (2016). Data-driven Decision Making: School Leadership and Its Relationship to School Performance Profile Scores. Wilkes University.
93.
MandinachE. B. (2012). A perfect time for data use: Using data-driven decision making to inform practice. Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.667064
94.
MandinachE. B.GummerE. S. (2013). Building Educators’ data literacy: Differing perspectives. Journal of Educational Research and Policy Studies, 13(2), 1–5.
95.
MandinachE. B.HoneyM. (2008). Data-driven school improvement: Linking data and learning. Teachers College Press.
96.
MandinachE. B.JacksonS. S. (2012). Transforming teaching and learning through data-driven decision making. Corwin Press.
97.
MarksH. M.PrintyS. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x03253412
98.
MarshJ. (2012). Interventions promoting educators’ use of data: Research insights and gaps. Teachers College Record, 114(11), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811211401106
99.
MarshJ.FarrellC. (2015). How leaders can support teachers with data-driven decision making: A framework for understanding capacity-building. Education Management Administration and Leadership, 43(2), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214537229
100.
MartinezG. (2010). Investigating school principals’ personal variables related to the use of data: Implications for professional development(Publication No. 734420206) [Ed.D. dissertation, New Mexico State University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
101.
MarzanoR. J. (2005). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
102.
MarzanoR. J.WatersT.McNultyB. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. ASCD.
103.
MassellD. (2001). The theory and practice of using data to build capacity: State and local strategies and their effects. In FuhrmanS. H. (Ed.), From the capital to the classroom: Standards-based reform in the States. University of Chicago Press.
104.
McLeodS.SeashoreK. (2006a). Data driven decision-making readiness survey: Teachers. University of Minnesota.
105.
McLeodS.SeashoreK. (2006b). Data driven decision-making readiness survey: Principals. University of Minnesota.
106.
McMasterK. L.LembkeE. S.ShinJ.PochA. L.SmithR. A.JungP.AllenA. A.WagnerK. (2020). Supporting Teachers’ use of data-based instruction to improve Students’ early writing skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000358
107.
MetcalfeJ. (2013). Learning from errors. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 465–489. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044022
108.
MurphyJ.ElliotS. N.GoldringE.PorterA. C. (2006). Learning-centered leadership: A conceptual foundation. Wallace Foundation.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq. (2011).
113.
NoonanB.RenihanP. (2006). Demystifying assessment leadership. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 56(4), 1–20.
114.
NoonanB.RenihanP. (2008). Building assessment literacy: Perceptions of high school principals. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 56(4), 1–21.
115.
NunneryJ.BernsteinI. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
PalucciD. M. (2010). Fostering Data-Driven Decision-Making in a Professional Learning Community of Special Education Teachers(Publication No. 3416574) [Ed. D. dissertation, Wilmington University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
118.
ParkV. (2018). Leading data conversation moves: Toward data-informed leadership for equity and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(4), 617–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18769050
119.
PochA. L.McMasterK. L.LembkeE. S. (2020). Usability and feasibility of data-based instruction for students with intensive writing needs. The Elementary School Journal, 121(2), 197–223. https://doi.org/10.1086/711235
120.
PophamW. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental?Phi Delta Kappan, 91(2), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909100205
121.
QuinnJ.McEachenJ.FullanM.GardnerM.DrummyM. (2020). Dive into Deep Learning: Tools for Engagement. Corwin.
122.
RenihanP.NoonanB. (2012). Principals as assessment leaders in rural schools. The Rural Educator, 33(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v33i3.407
123.
ReynoldsD. (2008). How professional learning communities use student data for improving achievement(Publication No. 3324969) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
124.
RobinsonV. M. J. (2012). Student-centered leadership. Jossey-Bass.
125.
RobinsonV. M.LloydC. A.RoweK. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161(08321509
126.
RoegmanR.KenneyR.MaedaY.JohnsG. (2021). When data-driven decision making becomes data-driven test taking: A case study of a midwestern high school. Educational Policy (Los Altos, Calif.), 35(4), 535–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904818823744
127.
RoegmanR.PrattS.GoodwinA. L.AkinS. (2020). How teachers use data: Description and differences across PreK through third grade. Early Childhood Education Journal, 50, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01168-3
128.
RuppA. A.DeyD. K.ZumboB. D. (2004). To Bayes or not to Bayes, from whether to when: Applications of Bayesian methodology to modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 424–451. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_7
129.
SafirS.DuganJ. (2021). Street data: A next-generation model for equity, pedagogy, and school transformation. Corwin Press.
130.
SanzoK. L.ShermanW. H.ClaytonJ. (2011). Leadership practices of successful middle school principals. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111102045
131.
SchellingN.RubensteinL. D. (2021). Elementary teachers’ perceptions of data-driven decision-making. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 33(2), 317–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-021-09356-w
132.
SchildkampK.KuiperW. (2010). Data-informed curriculum reform: Which data, what purposes, and promoting and hindering factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 482–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.007
133.
SchildkampK.LaiM. K.EarlL. (2013). Data-based decision making in education: challenges and opportunities. Springer.
134.
SchildkampK.PoortmanC. L.EbbelerJ.PietersJ. M. (2019). How school leaders can build effective data teams: Five building blocks for a new wave of data-informed decision making. Journal of Educational Change, 20(3), 283–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09345-3
SebringP. B.AllensworthE.BrykA. S.EastonJ. Q.LuppescuS. (2006). The Essential Supports for School Improvement. Consortium on School Research, The University of Chicago.
137.
SharrattL.FullanM. (2012). Putting Faces on the Data: What great leaders do!. Corwin Press.
138.
ShenJ.-P.CooleyV. E. (2008). Critical issues in using data for decision-making. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 11(3), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120701721839
139.
ShenJ.-P.CooleyV. E.MaX.ReevesP. L.BurtW. L.RaineyJ. M.YuanW.-H. (2012). Data-informed decision making on high-impact strategies: Developing and validating an instrument for principals. Journal of Experimental Education, 80(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2010.550338
140.
ShenJ.MaL.BaiY. (2019). Data leadership for improving student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(4), 573–606.
141.
ShenJ.MaX.BassettK. (2019). Leadership and data use: Professional learning for school improvement. Wiley.
142.
ShenJ.MaX.CooleyV. E.BurtW. L. (2016a). Measuring Principals’ data-informed decision-making on high-impact strategies. Journal of School Leadership, 26(3), 407–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461602600302
143.
ShenJ.MaX.CooleyV. E.BurtW. L. (2016b). Mediating effects of school process on the relationship between principals’ data-informed decision-making and student achievement. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 19(4), 373–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2014.986208
144.
ShenJ.MaX.GaoX.Bierlien PalmerL.PoppinkS.BurtW.LenewayR.McCrumbD.PearsonC.RaineyM.ReevesP.WegenkeG. (2018). Developing and validating an instrument measuring school leadership. Educational Studies, 45(4), 402–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1446338
145.
SilvaE.WhiteT.TochT. (2011). The schools we need: Lessons learned from school improvements. Education Sector Reports.
146.
SimpsonG. H. (2011). School leaders’ use of data-driven decision-making for school improvement: A study of promising practices in two California charter schools.(Publication No. 901883434) [Ed.D. dissertation, The University of Southern California]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
147.
SoslauD. M. (2009). School principals’ use of student performance data and the effects on student achievement(Publication No. 305135650) [Ed.D. dissertation, Widener University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
148.
SpillaneJ. P. (2012). Data in practice: Conceptualizing the data-based decision-making phenomena. American Journal of Education, 118(2), 113–141. https://doi.org/10.1086/663283
StreiferP.SchumannJ. (2005). Using data mining to identify actionable information: Breaking new ground in data-driven decision-making. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10(3), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327671espr1003_4
151.
SunJ.-P. (2014). Principals’ evidence-based decision-making: Its nature and impacts. In ChitpinS.EversC. W. (Eds.), Decision-making in educational leadership: Principles, policies and practices (pp. 21–38). Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203757277-3
152.
SunJ.-P. (2023). Transformational school leadership. In R. J. Tierney, F. Rizvi, & K. Erkican (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (4th ed.). Elsevier.
153.
SunJ.-P.JohnsonB.PrzybylskiR. M. (2016a). Leading with data: An increasingly important feature of school leadership. International Studies of Educational Administration, 44(3), 93–128.
154.
SunJ.-P.JohnsonB.PrzybylskiR. M. (2017). Data-informed school leadership: Constructing an incipient, working conceptual framework. Journal of School Public Relationships, 37(1), 8–55. https://doi.org/10.3138/jspr.37.1.8
155.
SunJ.-P.PrzybylskiR. M.JohnsonB. (2016b). A review of research on teachers’ use of student data: From the perspective of school leadership. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-016-9238-9
156.
SunJ.-P.XiaJ.-G.HuaC.ManK.-W.JohnsonB. (2023). Psychometric properties of the survey measuring data-informed instruction. Paper presented virtually at the annual conference of AERA, Chicago, Illinois.
157.
TeigenB. N. (2009). A systematic examination of data-driven decision-making within a school division: The relationships among principal beliefs, school characteristics, and accreditation status. Doctoral dissertation (retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (305175153)).
158.
TeigenS. M. (2011). Data use in education: The role of data in instructional decision-making (Publication No. 3456789) [Doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
159.
TimperleyH. (2009). Using assessment data for improving teaching practice[Paper presentation]. The ACER research conference on Assessment and Student Learning, perth, West Australia.
160.
TimperleyH.WilsonA.BarrarH.FungI. (2008). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration. New Zealand Ministry of Education.
161.
Van BuurenS.Groothuis-OudshoornK. (2011). MICE: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1–67. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03
162.
Van De SchootR.KaplanD.DenissenJ.AsendorpfJ. B.NeyerF. J.Van AkenM. A. G. (2014). A gentle introduction to Bayesian analysis: Applications to developmental research. Child Development, 85(3), 842–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12169
163.
Van GasseR.VanlommelK.VanhoofJ.Van PetegemP. (2017). The impact of collaboration on teachers’ individual data use. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(3), 489–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2017.1321555
164.
VisscherA. J. (2021). On the value of data-based decision making in education: The evidence from six intervention studies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 69, 100899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100899
165.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
166.
WahlstromK. L.LouisK. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 458–495.
167.
WangH.WatermanC.PerieM.MarionS. F. (2010). Investigating administrator and teacher use of interim assessments[Paper presentation]. The annual conference of the American Education Research Association, Denver, Colorado, United States.
168.
WassersteinR. L.LazarN. A. (2016). The ASA statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108
WaterburyG. T. (2019). Missing data and the rasch model: The effects of missing data mechanisms on item parameter estimation. Journal of Applied Measurement, 20(2), 154–166.
171.
WatkinsM. W. (2018). Exploratory factor analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 44(3), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798418771807
172.
WaymanJ. C.ChoV.JimersonJ. B.SnodgrassR.WalkerV. (2010). The data-informed district: A systemic approach to educational data use[Paper presentation]. The annual conference of the American Education Research Association, Denver, Colorado, United States.
173.
WaymanJ. C.ChoV.JimersonJ. B.SpikesD. D. (2012). District-wide effects on data use in the classroom. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(25).
WaymanJ. C.MidgleyS.StringfieldS. (2006). Leadership for data-based decision-making: Collaborative educator teams. In DanzigA. B. (Ed.), Learner centered leadership: Research, policy, and practice (pp. 189–206). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
176.
WilliamsonR. (2012). A study of effective teachers’ knowledge and use of intersectional data to improve student academic performance (Publication No. 3529983)[Ed. D. dissertation, The University of Memphis]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
177.
WoodsA.KlenowskiV. (2012). A sociocultural analysis of judgment practice for summative assessment in the early years of schooling[Paper presentation]. The annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
178.
WrightB. D.MeadR.DrabaR. (1976). Detecting and correcting test item bias with a logistic response model (No.22; Research Memorandum). MESA Psychometric Laboratory, Department of Education, University of Chicago.
179.
WuH.ShenJ. (2022). The association between principal leadership and student achievement: A multivariate meta-meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 100423, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100423
180.
YaoJ. (2009). Examining the applications of data-driven decision making on classroom instruction(Publication No. 304996783) [Ed.D. dissertation, The University of Southern California]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
181.
YılmazE.JafarovaG. (2022). Development of data driven decision making scale: A validity and reliability study. Research on Education and Psychology, 69–91. https://doi.org/10.54535/rep.1104114
182.
YoonS. Y. (2016). Principals' data-driven practice and its influences on teacher buy-in and student achievement in comprehensive school reform models. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 15(4), 500–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2016.1181199
