Faculty in practitioner-oriented EdD programs must continually defend the presence of rigor in their programs. The existence of rigor determines the preparedness of our educational leaders to disrupt and transform educational organizations to bring about equitable and socially just outcomes; however, perceptions of rigor by the larger community impact the overall success of these programs and their students. In this conceptual article, we discuss the ways in which the literature defines rigor within and beyond practitioner-oriented EdD programs. We integrate that the literature with the critical need for social justice leadership, and leadership preparation toward that end, to offer a conceptual framework for designing, assessing, improving, communicating, and defending the rigor of EdD programs centered upon social justice. We posit: EdD programs can claim to be rigorous and centered upon social justice if their faculty: (1) collectively envision and construct rigorous student learning outcomes (rigor as a challenge) connected to the learning of critical theory and the demonstration of critical praxis to improve the lives of marginalized/underserved students; and (2) use backward-design to develop and align curriculum and pedagogy with those outcomes, including scholarly learning experiences (rigor in research) and the elicitation of students’ critical thinking (rigor as complexity).
AndersonG. L.HerrK. (1999). The new paradigm wars: Is there room for rigorous practitioner knowledge in schools and universities?Educational Researcher, 28(5), 12–21, 40. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028005012
2.
AndersonL.W.KrathwohlD. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
3.
ArmorD. J. (2006). Brown and black-white achievementAcademic Questions, 19(2), 40–46.
4.
AssariS.BazarganM. (2019). Minorities’ diminished returns of educational attainment on hospitalization risk: National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Hospital Practices and Research, 4(3), 86. https://doi.org/10.15171/hpr.2019.17
5.
BainK. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Harvard University Press.
6.
BasuK. (2012). Ending the first Ed. D. program. Inside Higher Education, 3, 12.
7.
BloomB. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longman.
8.
BrantlingerE. A. (2006). BookWho benefits from special education?: Remediating (fixing) other people's children. Routledge.
9.
BrookfieldS. D. (2005). The power of critical theory for adult learning and teaching. Open University Press.
10.
BrownK. M. (2004). Leadership for social justice and equity: Weaving a transformative framework and pedagogy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 77–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X03259147
11.
BrundageV. (2017). Profile of the labor force by educational attainment. Spotlight on Statistics: US Bureau of Labor Statistics. U.S. Printing Office.
12.
BrunerJ. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press.
13.
B. S. (2017). Rigor or reliability and validity in qualitative research: Perspectives, strategies, reconceptualizations, and recommendations. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 253–263.
14.
ButtaroA.Jr.CatsambisS. (2019). Ability grouping in the early grades: Long-term consequences for educational equity in the United States. Teachers College Record, 121(2), 1–50.
15.
CapperC.TheoharisG.SebastianJ. (2006). Toward a framework for preparing leaders for social justice. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(3), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230610664814
16.
CapperC. A. (2018). Organizational theory for equity and diversity: Leading integrated, socially just education (1st ed.). Routledge.
ClarkE. (2005). Integrating an integrated curriculum: A postscript. Great-ideas.org. Retrieved January 12, 2021, from http://www.great-ideas.org/ClarkPS.pdf
20.
CollinsonV.CookT. F. (2006). Organizational learning: Improving learning, teaching, and leading in school systems. Sage Publications, Inc.
CopeC.StaehrL. (2005). Improving students’ learning approaches through intervention in an information systems learning environment. Studies in Higher Education, 30(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500043275
23.
Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. (n.d.). http://www.ncate.org/
CypressB. S. (2017). Rigor or reliability and validity in qualitative research: Perspectives, strategies, reconceptualizations, and recommendations. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 36(4), 253–263.
26.
Darling-HammondL. (2004). The color line in American education: Race, resources, and student achievement. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 1(2), 213–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X0404202X
27.
DeMatthewsD.MawhinneyH. (2014). Social justice leadership and inclusion: Exploring challenges in an urban district struggling to address inequities. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(5), 844–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13514440
DoaneA. W.Bonilla-SilvaE. (Eds.). (2003). White out: The continuing significance of racism. Psychology Press.
30.
DraegerJ., del Prado HillP.HunterL. R.MahlerR. (2013). The anatomy of academic rigor: The story of one institutional journey. Innovative Higher Education, 38(4), 267–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-012-9246-8
31.
ElbowP. (1986). Embracing contraries: Explorations in learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
32.
FirestoneW. A.PerryJ. A.LelandA. S.McKeonR. T. (2019) Teaching research and data use in the education doctorate. Journal of Research on Leadership Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775119872231
33.
FurmanG. (2012). Social justice leadership as praxis: Developing capacities through preparation programs. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(2), 191–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11427394
34.
GarranA. M.AymerS.GelmanC. R.MillerJ. L. (2015). Team-teaching anti-oppression with diverse faculty: Challenges and opportunities. Social Work Education, 34(7), 799–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2015.1062086
35.
GayG.KirklandK. (2003). Developing cultural critical consciousness and self-reflection in preservice teacher education. Theory Into Practice, 42(3), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4203_3
36.
GewirtzS.CribbA. (2002). Plural conceptions of social justice: Implications for policy sociology. Journal of Education Policy, 17(5), 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930210158285
GoldfarbK. P.GrinbergJ. (2002). Leadership for social justice: Authentic participation in the case of a community center in Caracas, Venezuela. Journal of School Leadership, 12(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460201200204
Hinnant-CrawfordB.Nazario y ColonR.DavisT. W. (2021) Who is involved? Who is impacted? Teaching improvement science for education justice. In SpauldingD. T.CrowR.Hinnant-CrawfordB. (Eds.), Teaching improvement science in educational leadership: A pedagogical guide (pp. 17–42). Myers Education Press.
41.
Hinnant-CrawfordB. N. (2020). Improvement science in education: A primer. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
42.
HochbeinC.PerryJ. A. (2013). The Role of Research in the Professional Doctorate. Planning & Changing, 44(3/4), 181–194.
43.
HorsfordS. D. (2014). When race enters the room: Improving leadership and learning through racial literacy. Theory Into Practice, 53(2), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.885812
44.
JohnsonH. B.ShapiroT. M. (2013). Good neighborhoods, good schools: Race and the good choices of White families. In DoaneA. W. & Bonilla-SilvaE. (Eds.), White out: The continuing significance of racism (pp. 175–189).
45.
KendiI. X. (2019). How to be an antiracist. One World.
46.
KhalifaM. A.GoodenM. A.DavisJ. E. (2016). Culturally responsive school leadership: A synthesis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1272–1311. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316630383
47.
Kochhar-BryantC. A. (2017). Symbiotic space: Exploring the nexus of rigor, problems of practice and implementation. Impacting Education, 2(2017), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.5195/ie.2017.25
48.
KumarS. (2014). Quality considerations in the design and implementation of an online doctoral program. Journal of Online Doctoral Education, 1(1), 6–22.
49.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2013). Lack of achievement or loss of opportunity. In CarterP.WelnerK. (Eds.), Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give every child an even chance (pp. 11–22). Oxford University Press.
50.
LesterS. (2012). Creating original knowledge in and for the workplace: Evidence from a practitioner doctorate. Studies in Continuing Education, 34(3), 267–280https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2011.613595
51.
LightR. (2001). Making the most of college: Students speak their minds. Harvard University Press.
52.
LittleJ. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509–536.
53.
MahonK.HeikkinenH. L.HuttunenR. (2019). Critical educational praxis in university ecosystems: Enablers and constraints. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 27(3), 463–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2018.1522663
54.
MilemJ. F. (2003). The educational benefits of diversity: Evidence from multiple sectors. In M. J. Chang, D. Witt, J. Jones, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Compelling interest: Examining the evidence on racial dynamics in higher education, (pp. 126–169). Stanford University Press.
55.
MorseJ. M.BarrettMMayanO.SpiersJ. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods,1(2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202
56.
MowenT.BrentJ. (2016). School discipline as a turning point: The cumulative effect of suspension on arrest. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53(5), 628–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427816643135
NogueraP. (2008). What discipline is for: Connecting students to the benefits of learning. In PollockM (Ed.), Everyday antiracism: Getting real about race in schools, (pp. 132–138). The New Press.
59.
NorthC. E. (2006). More than words? Delving into the substantive meaning(s) of “social justice” in education. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 507–535. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076004507
60.
OakesJ. (2008). Keeping track: Structuring equality and inequality in an era of accountability. Teachers College Record, 110(3), 700–712.
61.
OakesJ.WellsA. S.JonesM.DatnowA. (2012). Detracking: The social construction of ability, cultural politics, and resistance to reform. Teachers College Record,98(3), 48920–48510.
62.
OddenA. R.ArchibaldS. J. (2009). Doubling student performance and finding the resources to do it. Corwin Press.
63.
OlsenK.ClarkC. M. (2009). A signature pedagogy in doctoral education: The leader–scholar community. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 216–221. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09334207
PerryJ. A. (2012b). What does history reveal about the education doctorate? In LattaM. (Ed.), Placing practitioner knowledge in the center of teacher education. Educational policy in practice: Critical cultural studies (pp. 51–75). Information Age Publishing.
PopayJ.RogersA.WilliamsG. (1998). Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239800800305
68.
PowellA. G. (1980). The uncertain profession. Harvard University Press.
69.
ProsserM.TrigwellK. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. McGraw-Hill Education.
70.
RouthieauxR. L. (2015). Fostering integrated learning and faculty collaboration through curriculum design: A case study. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 4(1), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v4n1p122
71.
RubinH. (2005). The proposed abolition of the Ed.D. [A letter to the editor]. Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(11), A63.
72.
SchonD. A. (1995). Knowing-in-action: The new scholarship requires a new epistemology. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 27(6), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1995.10544673
ShulmanL. S.GoldeC. M.BueschelA. C.GarabedianK. J. (2006). Reclaiming education’s doctorates: A critique and a proposal. Educational Researcher,35(3), 25– 32. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035003025
75.
StoreyV. AHesbolK. A. (2014) Can the dissertation in practice bridge the researcher–practitioner gap? The education professional practice doctorate and the impact of the Carnegie project on the education doctorate consortium. Journal of School Public Relations,35(3), 324–347. https://doi.org/10.3138/jspr.35.3.324
76.
StrongR. W.SilverH. F.PeriniM. J. (2001). Teaching what matters most: Standards for raising student achievement. ASCD.
TheoharisG. (2007). Social justice educational leaders and resistance: Toward a theory of social justice leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(2), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X06293717
79.
TheoharisG. (2008). “At every turn”: The resistance that principals face in their pursuit of equity and justice. Journal of School Leadership,18(3), 303–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460801800304
80.
TrigwellK.ProsserM. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: The influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22(3), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132290
WeilerJ. R.Hinnant-CrawfordB. (2021). School leadership team competence for implementing equity systems change: An exploratory study. The Urban Review, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-021-00600-7
WigginsG.P.WigginsG.McTigheJ. (2005). Understanding by design. ASCD.
85.
WillemsC. (2010). But what makes it doctoral?: Taking on the traditionalists: Interdisciplinary, practice-led doctoral research in the creative industries – A case study in academic politics, research, rigor and relevance. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences,5(7), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1882/CGP/v05i07/51778
