I Do as I Think: Exploring the Alignment of Principal Cognitions and Behaviors and Its Effects on Teacher Outcomes

Abstract

Purpose: Decades of research in educational leadership has extolled the importance of principals in both the effective functioning of teachers and the overall performance of schools. The mechanisms explaining what makes principals effective in the eyes of teachers, however, are not well known. This study builds on prior research to posit that principal effectiveness is the result of their own cognitions, which are translated into specific leadership behaviors directed at teachers, which, in turn, serve to foster trust. Research Methods/Approach: Data came from principals and teachers in 33 French and English Canadian elementary schools. All principals took part in a face-to-face interview which elicited their leadership cognitions, while teachers responded to measures of principal leadership behaviors, trust, and effectiveness. Findings: This research provides empirical support for a sequential mediation model whereby principal leadership cognitions were related to teacher evaluations of principal effectiveness through teacher ratings of principal leadership behaviors and teacher trust in their principal. Specifically, we found support for three specific leadership behaviors (supporting, developing, and active management-by-exception). Implications for Research and Practice: The results reveal the importance of a number of distinctive leadership behaviors in fostering a work context where teachers are able to perform effectively. Principals who “walk the talk” tended to be perceived as more trustworthy and effective. Additionally, the results suggest that principals’ professional development could focus on cognitions related to leadership behaviors and effectiveness.

Keywords

school leadership teacher trust principal cognitions leadership effectiveness leadership behaviors

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Antonakis

Avolio

B. J.

Sivasubramaniam

(2003). Context and leadership: An examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 261-295.

Ashton

P. T.

Webb

R. B.

(1986). Teacher efficacy and student achievement. New York, NY: Longman.

Avanzi

Fraccaroli

Castelli

Marcionetti

Crescentini

Balducci

van Dick

(2018). How to mobilize social support against workload and burnout: The role of organizational identification. Teaching and Teacher Education, 69, 154-167.

Avolio

B. J.

Luthans

(2006). The high impact leader: Moments matter in accelerating authentic leadership. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Bass

B. M.

(1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.

Bass

B. M.

(1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Bass

B. M.

Avolio

B. J.

(1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.

Bass

B. M.

Avolio

B. J.

(1995). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire technical report. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.

Bass

B. M.

Avolio

B. J.

(2004) Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.

10.

Birasnav

(2014). Knowledge management and organizational performance in the service industry: The role of transformational leadership beyond the effects of transactional leadership. Journal of Business Research, 67, 1622-1629.

11.

Bliese

P. D.

(2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Klein

K. J.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

(Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

12.

Braun

Peus

Weisweiler

Frey

(2013). Transformational leadership, job satisfaction, and team performance: A multilevel mediation model of trust. Leadership Quarterly, 24, 270-283.

13.

Bryk

A. S.

Schneider

B. L.

(2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage.

14.

Bryk

A. S.

Sebring

P. B.

Allensworth

Luppescu

Easton

J. Q.

(2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

15.

Burke

C. S.

Sims

D. E.

Lazzara

E. H.

Salas

(2007). Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 606-632.

16.

Caprara

G. V.

Barbaranelli

Steca

Malone

P. S.

(2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 473-490.

17.

Choudhary

A. I.

Akhtar

S. A.

Zaheer

(2013). Impact of transformational and servant leadership on organizational performance: A comparative analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 116, 433-440.

18.

Darling-Hammond

(1988). Policy and professionalism. In Lieberman

(Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools (pp. 55-77). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

19.

Davis

Darling-Hammond

LaPointe

Meyerson

(2005). School leadership study: Developing successful principals (review of research). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

20.

Dirks

K. T.

Ferrin

D. L.

(2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611-628.

21.

Dvir

Eden

Avolio

B. J.

Shamir

(2002). Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 735-744.

22.

Fleenor

J. W.

Smither

J. W.

Atwater

L. E.

Braddy

P. W.

Sturm

R. E.

(2010). Self-other rating agreement in leadership: A review. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 1005-1034.

23.

Gardner

W. L.

Cogliser

C. C.

Davis

K. M.

Dickens

M. P.

(2011). Authentic leadership: A review of the literature and research agenda. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 1120-1145.

24.

Goddard

R. D.

Miller

R. J.

(2010). The conceptualization, measurement, and effects of school leadership: Introduction to the special issue. Elementary School Journal, 111, 219-225.

25.

Goodwin

R. H.

Cunningham

M. L.

Childress

(2003). The changing role of the secondary principal. NASSP Bulletin, 87, 26-42.

26.

Goodwin

R. H.

Cunningham

M. L.

Eagle

(2005). The changing role of the secondary principal in the United States: An historical perspective. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 37, 1-17.

27.

Grenier

R. S.

Dudzinska-Przesmitzki

(2015). A conceptual model for eliciting mental models using a composite methodology. Human Resource Development Review, 14, 163-184.

28.

Grissom

J. A.

(2011). Can good principals keep teachers in disadvantaged schools? Linking principal effectiveness to teacher satisfaction and turnover in hard-to-staff environments. Teachers College Record, 113, 2552-2585.

29.

Hallinger

Heck

(1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9, 157-191.

30.

Halverson

S. K.

Tonidandel

Barlow

C. B.

Dipboye

R. L.

(2005). Self–other agreement on a 360-degree leadership evaluation. In Reddy

(Ed.), Multi-source performance assessment: Perspective and insights. Hyderabad, India: ICFAI University Press.

31.

Handford

Leithwood

(2013). Why teachers trust school leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 51, 194-212.

32.

Hayes

A. F.

(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

33.

Hetland

Andreassen

C. S.

Pallesen

Notelaers

(2011). Leadership and fulfillment of the three basic psychological needs at work. Career Development International, 16, 507-523.

34.

Hogan

Curphy

G. J.

Hogan

(1994). What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 49, 493-504.

35.

Hoy

W. K.

(1992). Faculty trust in colleagues: Linking the principal with school effectiveness. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 26, 38-45.

36.

Hoy

W. K.

Sweetland

S. R.

(2001). Designing better schools: The meaning and measure of enabling school structures. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, 296-321.

37.

Ibrahim

Al-Taneiji

(2012). Principal leadership style, school performance, and principal effectiveness in Dubai schools. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 2, 41-51.

38.

James

L. R.

Demaree

R. G.

Wolf

(1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.

39.

Johnson

Grayson

(2005). Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships. Journal of Business Research, 58, 500-507.

40.

Kagan

D. M.

(1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks principle. Review of Educational Research, 60, 419-469.

41.

Kim

Yukl

(1995). Relationships of managerial effectiveness and advancement to self-reported and subordinate-reported leadership behaviors from the multiple-linkage model. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 361-377.

42.

Kruger

Witziers

Sleegers

(2007). The impact of school leader variables on school level factors: Validation of a causal model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18, 1-20.

43.

Lashway

(2003). Role of the school leader: Trends and issues (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED479933). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

44.

Leithwood

(2012). School leadership, evidence-based decision making, and large-scale student assessment. Studies in Educational Leadership, 15, 17-39.

45.

Leithwood

K. A.

Anderson

Mascall

(2010). How leaders influence student learning: The four paths. In Bush

Middlewood

(Eds.). The principles of educational leadership and management. London, England: Sage.

46.

Leithwood

K. A.

Harris

Hopkins

(2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 28, 27-42.

47.

Leithwood

K. A.

Riehl

(2003). What we know about successful school leadership. Nottingham, England: National College for School Leadership.

48.

Littrell

P. C.

Billingsley

Cross

(1994). The effects of principal support on special and general educators’ stress, job satisfaction, school commitment, health, and intent to stay in teaching. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 297-310.

49.

Lord

R. G.

Emrich

C. G.

(2001). Thinking outside the box by looking inside the box: Extending the cognitive revolution in leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 11, 551-579.

50.

Louis

K. S.

(2007). Trust and improvement in schools. Journal of Educational Change, 8, 1-24.

51.

Luthans

Avolio

B. J.

(2003). Authentic leadership: A positive development approach. In Cameron

K. S.

Dutton

J. E.

Quinn

R. E.

(Eds.). Positive organizational scholarship, San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

52.

Marks

H. M.

Printy

S. M.

(2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 370-397.

53.

Marzano

R. J.

Waters

McNulty

B. A.

(2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

54.

Mayer

R. C.

Davis

J. H.

Schoorman

F. D.

(1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.

55.

McAllister

D. J.

(1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24-59.

56.

Meier

(2002). In schools we trust: Creating communities of learning in an era of testing and standardization. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

57.

Mumford

M. D.

Watts

L. L.

Partlow

P. J.

(2015). Leader cognition: Approaches and findings. Leadership Quarterly, 26, 301-306.

58.

Rowan

(1990). Commitment and control: Alternative strategies for the organizational design of schools. In Cazden

C. B.

(Ed.), Review of research in education ( Vol.16, pp. 353-389). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

59.

Schaubroeck

Lam

S. S.

Peng

A. C.

(2011). Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 863-871.

60.

Shrout

P. E.

Fleiss

J. L.

(1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.

61.

Simons

(2002). Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers’ words and deeds as a research focus. Organization Science, 13, 18-35.

62.

Sinnema

C. E.

Robinson

V. M.

Ludlow

Pope

(2015). How effective is the principal? Discrepancy between New Zealand teachers’ and principals’ perceptions of principal effectiveness. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 27, 275-301.

63.

Tarter

C. J.

Bliss

J. R.

Hoy

W. K.

(1989). School characteristics and faculty trust in secondary schools. Education Administration Quarterly, 25, 294-308.

64.

Taylor

A. B.

MacKinnon

D. P.

Tein

J. Y.

(2008). Tests of the three-path mediated effect. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 241-269.

65.

Tschannen-Moran

(2004). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

66.

Tschannen-Moran

Gareis

C. R.

(2015a). Faculty trust in the principal: An essential ingredient in high-performing schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 53, 66-92.

67.

Tschannen-Moran

Gareis

C. R.

(2015b). Principals, trust, and cultivating vibrant schools. Societies, 5, 256-276.

68.

Wahlstrom

K. L.

Louis

K. S.

(2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 458-495.

69.

Waters

Marzano

McNulty

(2004). Leadership that sparks learning. Educational Leadership, 61, 48-52.

70.

Webber

S. S.

(2008). Development of cognitive and affective trust in teams. Small Group Research, 39, 746-769.

71.

Witziers

Bosker

Kruger

(2003). Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 398-425.

72.

Wofford

J. C.

Goodwin

V. L.

(1994). A cognitive interpretation of transactional and transformational leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 5, 161-186.

73.

Wofford

J. C.

Goodwin

V. L.

Whittington

J. L.

(1998). A field study of a cognitive approach to understanding transformational and transactional leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 9, 55-84.

74.

Woolfolk-Hoy

Hoy

W. K.

(2009). Instructional leadership: A research-based guide to learning in schools (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

75.

Yang

Mossholder

K. W.

Peng

T. K.

(2009). Supervisory procedural justice effects: The mediating roles of cognitive and affective trust. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 143-154.

76.

Yukl

(2006). Leadership in organizations (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

77.

Yukl

Gordon

Taber

(2002). A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: Integrating a half century of behavior research. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9, 15-32

78.

Yukl

van Fleet

(1992). Theory and research on leadership in organizations. In Dunnette

M. D.

Hough

L. M.

(Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 147-197). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.

79.

Yukl

Wall

Lepsinger

(1990). Preliminary report on validation of the managerial practices survey. In Clark

K. E.

Clark

M. B.

(Eds.), Measures of leadership (pp. 223-238). West Orange, NJ: Leadership Library of America.

80.

Zheng

Chen

Loeb

(2017). What aspects of principal leadership are most highly correlated with school outcomes in China? Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(3), 409-447.