Background: School district superintendents continue to favor collaborative relationships with their local business communities amid concerns over free-market competition, maintaining public legitimacy, and scarce financial resources. Prior research is inadequate regarding the development, implementation, and institutionalization of school and business collaboration, with respect to current institutional and market pressures, and the unique contributions of superintendents. Purpose: The purpose was to examine the superintendent’s role in the development and institutionalization of school and business partnerships in a district without prior history of collaborative relationships and to assess capacity for sustainability. Setting: A medium- sized (12,850 students) metropolitan-area school district in the U.S. Southwest that also includes one local chamber of commerce was the setting. Participants: Two district superintendents (transition in leadership occurred), a chamber of commerce CEO, and 13 other school district officials and business leaders (i.e., principals, chamber members, partnership coordinator) directly involved in partnerships or providing administrative oversight participated. Research Design: Qualitative case study was the research design. Data Collection and Analysis: Data were obtained using semistructured interviews, observations, and document analysis. A conceptual model for developing business partnerships and neo-institutionalism theory guide this qualitative analysis. Findings: Superintendent agency and district capacity for action (i.e., lack of professional development, departure of key roles, overdependency on myth and ceremony) both enabled and constrained partnership development, implementation, and capacity for institutionalization in the context of current institutional and market pressures. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the complimentary usefulness of the conceptual model and neo-institutionalism theory for studying leadership of school district and business partnerships and building school and community capacity for educational change.
AbowitzK. K. (2000). Democratic communities and business/education “partnerships” in secondary education. Urban Review, 32, 313-341.
2.
AbowitzK. K.BoylesD. (2000). Private interests or public goods: Dewey, Rugg, and their contemporary allies on corporate involvement in education reform initiatives. Philosophy of Education, 131-139.
3.
AlbaG. D. (2000). An evaluation model for school and business partnerships(Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest database. (AAT 9999549)
4.
AlderL.CraginJ.SearlsP. (1995). The Los Angeles area business/education partnership. West Covina, CA: East San Gabriel Regional Occupational Program. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED388851)
5.
AnagnostopoulosD.RutledgeS. A. (2007). Making sense of school sanctioning policies in urban high schools. Teachers College Record, 109(5), 1261-1302.
6.
ArumR. (2000). Schools and communities: Ecological and institutional dimensions. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 395-418.
7.
BaliV. A.AnagnostopoulosD.RobertsR. (2005, Summer). Toward a political explanation of grade retention. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 133-155.
8.
BartlettL.FederickM.GulbrandsenT.MurillosourceE. (2002). The marketization of education: Public schools for private ends. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 33(1), 5-29.
9.
BergB. L. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
10.
BidwellC. E. (2006). Varieties of institutional theory: Traditions and prospects for educational research. In MeyerH. D.RowanB. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 33-50). Albany: State University of New York Press.
11.
Bodinger-de UriateC.Fleming-McCormickT.SchwagerM.ClarkM.DanzbergerJ. (1996, April). A guide to promising practices in educational partnerships. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED392980)
12.
BrentB. O.LundenS. (2009). Much ado about very little: The benefits and costs of school-based commercial activities. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8, 307-336. DOI:10.1080/1570076080248861910.1080/15700760802488619.
13.
BrownP. (2005, April). The shadow curriculum. Yearbook of the national Society for the Study of Education, 104(1), 119-139.
14.
BurchP. (2002). Constraints and opportunities in changing policy environments: Intermediary organizations’ response to complex district contexts. In HightowerA.KnappM.MarshJ.McLaughlinM. (Eds.), School districts and instructional renewal (pp. 111-126). New York: Teachers College Press.
15.
BurchP. (2007). Educational policy and practice from the perspective of institutional theory: Crafting a wider lens. Educational Researcher, 36(2), 84-95. doi:10.3102/0013189X0729979210.3102/0013189X07299792
ClarkT. A. (1992). Collaboration to build competence: The urban superintendents’ perspective.ERIC Review2(2), 2-6.
18.
CoburnC. E. (2005, Spring). The role of non-system actors in the relationships between policy and practice: The case of reading instruction in California. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 23-52.
19.
CookS. M. (2005). Analysis of characteristics of effective school and business partnerships: A case study of a medium size Florida district(Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest database. (AAT 3183050)
20.
CornellS. R. (1996). Partnerships that work: Business/education coalitions for the 21st century. St. Louis, MO: National Council for Occupational Education. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED400408)
21.
CowanL. A. (1994). A model for developing business-education partnerships for Tech Prep program. Bellingham: Western Washington University. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED376317)
22.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
26.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1991a). Introduction. In PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1-40). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1991b). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 63-82). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
FligsteinN. (1991). The structural transformation of American industry: An institutional account of the causes of diversification in the largest firms, 1919–1979. In PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 311-336). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29.
GhyselsM.ThibodeauxK. (2006). A new approach to business partnerships: Deeper, more sustainable relationship between schools and local businesses are more likely to result in systemic change in education. Leadership, 36(2), 18-21.
30.
GreenbergR. (1999). Get with the partnership. Techniques: Making Education and Career Connections, 74(4), 14-17.
31.
GreenwoodR.HiningsC. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1022-1054.
32.
GrobeT. (1990). Synthesis of existing knowledge and practice in the field of educational partnerships. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED325535)
33.
GrobeT.CurnanS. P.MelchoirA. (1993). Synthesis of existing knowledge and practice in the field of educational partnerships. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED362994)
34.
HallR. F.CastraleE. G.ZimmermanS. (1993). Business-education partnerships: Developing a collaborative relationship with business and community. Macomb: Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs, Western Illinois University. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED369169)
35.
HandsC. (2005). It’s who you know and what you know: The process of creating partnerships between schools and communities. School Community Journal, 15(3), 63-84.
36.
HannL. W. (2008, April). Profit and loss in school–business partnerships. District Administration, 44(5), 26-30.
37.
HoffD. (2002). School–business partnerships: It’s the schools’ turn to raise the grade. School Community Journal, 12(2), 63-77.
HonigM. I. (2004, Spring). The new middle management: Intermediary organizations in education policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 65-87.
40.
KaplanG. (1996). Profits R us: Notes on the commercialization of America’s schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(3), K1-K12.
41.
KraatzM. S.ZajacE. J. (1996). Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: The causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change. American Sociological Review, 61, 812-836.
42.
LankardB. A. (1995). Business/education partnerships (ERIC Digest No. 156). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult Career and Vocational Education. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED383856)
43.
LevineM.TrachtmanR. (Eds.). (1988). American business and the public school: Case studies of corporate involvement in public education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
44.
LongoriaT. (1999). The distribution of public-private partnerships: Targeting of voluntary efforts to improve urban education. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 315-329. doi:10.1177/080076409928300510.1177/0800764099283005
Lozar-GlennJ. (2001). The giving and the taking: Business-education partnerships come of age. Business Education Forum, 55(3), 6-8. Retrieved from ERIC database. (EJ619212)
47.
MerriamS. B. (2001). Case studies as qualitative research. In ConradC. F.HaworthJ. G.LattucaL. R. (Eds.), Qualitative Research in Higher Education (pp. 191-200). Boston, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing.
48.
MeyerH. D.RowanB. (2006). Institutional analysis and the study of education. In MeyerH. D.RowanB. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 1-14). Albany: State University of New York Press.
49.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony?American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
50.
MickelsonR. A. (1999, Spring). International business machinations: A case study of corporate involvement in local educational reform. Teachers College Record, 100, 476-512.
51.
MorleyE. (2000). Making greater and better use of the private sector in education: Suggestions for school–business partnerships. In HakimS.RyanD. J.StullJ. C. (Eds.), Restructuring education: Innovations and evaluations of alternative systems (pp. 197-208). Westport, CT: Praeger.
52.
MuhammadL. (2006). School–business organizational partnerships: Investigating the perceptions of superintendents regarding partnerships within the community(Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest database. (AAT 3250392)
53.
OtterbourgS. (1986). School partnerships handbook: How to set up and administer programs with business>, government and your community. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
54.
PoweK. (1991). Business-Education collaboration: An old relationship in new times. Updating School Policies, 22(7), 1-4. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED339131)
55.
ReidM. (1992). Partnership for progress: Development and implementation of a framework for increasing partnerships between business and school districts(EdD practicum report). Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED363002)
56.
RigdenD. W. (1991). Business/school partnerships: A path to effective school restructuring. New York: Council For Aid to Education.
57.
RigdenD. W. (1992). Business and the schools: A guide to effective programs (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Council for Aid to Education.
58.
RowanB. (2006). The new institutionalism and the study of educational organizations: Changing ideas for changing times. In MeyerH. D.RowanB. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 15-32). Albany: State University of New York Press.
59.
RubinH. (2009). Collaborative leadership: Developing effective partnerships for communities and schools (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
60.
SandersM. G. (2006). Building school–community partnerships: Collaboration for student success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
61.
SelznickP. (1957). Leadership in administration. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
62.
ShippsD. (1997). The invisible hand: Big business and Chicago school reform. Teachers College Record, 99, 73-116.
63.
ShippsD. (2006). School reform, corporate style: Chicago 1880-2000. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
64.
SmithJ.WohlstetterP. (2006). Understanding the different faces of partnering: A typology of public-private partnerships. School Leadership and Management, 26, 249-268.
65.
StainbackJ.DonahueM. B. (2005, October). Outside the budget box—Public/private partnership as a creative vehicle for finance and delivery of public school facilities. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 131, 292-296. doi:10.106/(ASCE)1052-3928(2005)131:4(292)10.106/(ASCE)1052-3928(2005)131:4(292)
66.
TushnetN. C. (1993). A guide to developing educational partnerships. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED362992)
UtterJ.StandleyM. (2000). School business partnerships: A leader’s manual (Visions Leadership Series). Anchorage, AK: Visions Technology.
69.
VandegriftJ.SandlerL. (1993, June). Evaluating business partnership programs in education: What defines a successful venture?Tempe: Arizona State University, Morrison Institute for Public Policy.
70.
Vander ScheeC.BoylesD. (2010). “Exergaming,” corporate interests and the crisis discourse of childhood obesity. Sport, Education, and Society, 15, 169-185. doi:10.1080/1357332100368382810.1080/13573321003683828
71.
WechterD. (2004). School–business partnership: Awareness, attitudes, and actions of secondary school principals and their business counterparts in selected Florida districts(Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest database. (AAT 3139427)
72.
WrayR. D.HaynesT. (1992, April). Business/education collaboration: Perceived roles for partners. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED344306)
73.
WoodsG. J.WoodsP. A. (2005, January). At the hard edge of change: Views from secondary head teachers on a public-private partnership. Journal of Educational Policy Studies, 20, 23-38.
74.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
