Purpose: In light of the excessively broad conceptions and nonobservable terms generally characterizing discussions of organizational learning, this study explores the notion of organizational learning in schools through the conceptual framework of organizational learning mechanisms (OLM) and develops a measure of OLM at the elementary school level.
Research Design:Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of items are conducted to examine factorial validity. To test the criterion-related validity, the OLM scale is correlated to other established constructs.
Findings: Based on information processing (management science perspective), the four-factor model of OLM in elementary schools is the best fit between the empirical results and the conceptual formulation. The four-factor model includes the following subscales: analyzing information, storing—retrieving—putting to use of information, receiving—disseminating information, and seeking information.
Implications: This study strengthens the feasibility of the OLM framework, based on information processing, to provide a concrete description of organizational learning processes in schools. Using this instrument, schools can assess their own learning cycle, gauging their readiness and increasing their preparation for becoming learning organizations. This study may encourage researchers to explore whether OLM can serve as mediating variable between the system level and the classroom level.
Almor, T., Ellis, S., & Shenkar, O. (1997). The concept of uncertainty in structural contingency theory: Toward a system approach. Tel Aviv, Israel: Tel Aviv University.
2.
Antelo, A., & Ovando, M.N. (1993). Levels of environmental uncertainty of a site-based management school within a minority/majority context. Journal of School Leadership, 3, 136-151.
3.
Arbuckle, J.L., & Wothke, W. (1999). AMOS 4.0 user's guide. Chicago : Small Waters.
4.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
5.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
6.
Barnes, N. (2000). Teachers training teachers. Education Week, 19, 38-42.
7.
Brew, C., Beatty, B., & Watt, A. (2004, December). Measuring students' sense of connected-ness with school. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education annual conference, Melbourne, Australia.
8.
Brooks, J.S., Placier, M., & Cockrell, K.S. (2003, November). Exploring the dark side of school reform: Teacher professional community and anomie. Paper presented at the annual convention of the University Council for Educational Administration, Portland, OR.
9.
Bryk, A.S., Camburn, E., & Louis, K.S. (1999). Professional community in Chicago elementary schools: Facilitating factors and organizational consequences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(5), 751-781.
10.
Bryk, A.S., & Driscoll, M.E. (1988). The school as community: Theoretical foundations, contextual influences, and consequences for students and teachers. Chicago: Center for School Improvement at the University of Chicago.
11.
Bryk, A.S., Lee, V.E., & Holland, P.B. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
12.
Byrne, B.M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Cohen, M.D., & Bacdayan, P. (1996). Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from a laboratory study. In M. D. Cohen & L. S. Sproull (Eds.), Organizational learning (pp. 403-429). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Conroy, D.E., Motl, R.W., & Hall, E.G. (2000). Progress toward construct validation of the self-presentation in exercise questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology , 22, 21-38.
16.
Corcoran, G., & Goertz, H. (1995). Instructional capacity and high performance schools . Educational Researcher, 17(9), 27-31.
17.
Cousins, B. (1998). Intellectual roots of organizational learning . In K. Leithwood & K. Seashore Louis (Eds.), Organizational learning in schools (pp. 219-236). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zetlinger.
18.
Cramer, K.M. (2000). Comparing the relative fit of various factor models of the self-consciousness scale in two independent samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 295-307.
19.
Crossan, M.M., & Guatto, T. (1996). Organizational learning research profile. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 9, 107-112.
20.
Cyert, R.M., & March, J.G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
Daft, R.L., & Weick, K.E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284-295.
22.
Darling-Hamond, L. (1996). What matters most: A competent teacher for every child. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(3), 193-200.
Dodgson, M. (1993). Organizational learning: A review of some literatures . Organization Studies, 14(3), 375-394.
25.
DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service.
26.
Duncan, R.B. (1972). Characteristics of organization environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administration Science Quarterly, 17, 313-327.
27.
Easterby-Smith, M. (1997). Disciplines of the learning organizations: Contributions and critiques. Human Relations, 50, 1085-1113.
28.
Edmondson, A., & Moingeon, B. (1998). From organizational learning to the learning organization . Management Learning, 29, 5-20.
29.
Ellis, S., & Maidan-Gilad, N. (1997). Effects of organizational learning mechanisms on organizational performance and shared mental models during planned change. Tel Aviv, Israel: Recanati Graduate School of Business Administration, Tel Aviv University.
30.
Ellis, S., & Shpilberg, N. (2003). Organizational learning mechanisms and managers' perceived uncertainty. Human Relations, 56(10), 1233-1254.
31.
Elmore, R., Peterson, P., & McCarthy, S. (1996). Restructuring the classroom: Teaching, learning and school organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32.
Fenwick, T.J. (1997). Questioning the learning organization concept . In S. M. Scott, B. Spencer, & A. Thomas (Eds.), Learning for life: Reading in Canadian adult education (pp. 140-152). Toronto, Canada: Thompson.
33.
Fiol, M.C., & Lyles, M.A. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803-813.
34.
Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces. London: Falmer.
35.
Fullan, M. (1995). The school as learning organization: Distant dreams . Theory Into Practice, 34(4), 230-235.
36.
Fullan, M. (2000). The three stories of educational reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(8), 581-584.
37.
Galbraith, J.R. (1974). Organizations design: An information processing view. Interfaces, 4(3), 28-36.
38.
Garvin, D.A. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 78-91.
39.
Getz, O. (1997). The relationship between system properties and system changeability, as deduced from cognitive maps and questionnaires, and the organizational learning mechanism. Unpublished MSc thesis, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
40.
Ghoshal, S. (1987). Global strategy: An organizing framework. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 425-440.
41.
Giles, C., & Hargreaves, A. (2003, April). Daring to be different: The sustainability of schools as learning organizations and professional learning communities during standard-based reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association , Chicago.
42.
Globerson, S., & Ellis, S. (1996). The organizational learning processes questionnaire . Tel Aviv, Israel: Tel Aviv University .
43.
Goddard, R.D. (2001). Collective efficacy: A neglected construct in the study of schools and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 467-476.
44.
Goddard, R.D., & Goddard, Y.L. (2001). A multilevel analysis of the relationship between teacher and collective efficacy in urban schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 1-12.
45.
Goddard, R.D., Hoy, W.K., & LoGerfo, L. (2003, April). Collective efficacy and student achievement in public high schools: A path analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association , Chicago.
46.
Goddard, R.D., Hoy, W.K., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and effect on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479-507.
Hall, R.I. (1984). The natural logic of management policymaking: Its implications for the survival of an organization. Management Science, 30(8), 905-927.
49.
Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. New York: Teachers College Press.
50.
Heath, R.L. (1994). The management of corporate communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51.
Hoy, W.K., Sweetland, S.R., & Smith, P.A. (2002). Toward an organizational model of achievement in high schools: The significance of collective efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 77-93.
Huber, G.P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88-115.
54.
Issacson, N., & Bamburg, J. (1992). Can schools become learning organizations? Educational Leadership, 50(3), 42-44.
55.
Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications . Chicago: SPSS.
56.
Kaiser, H.F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrics, 23, 187-201.
57.
Kelloway, E.K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher's guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
Kerlinger, F. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
59.
Kivimaki, M., Kuk, G., Elvoninio, M., Thompson, L., Lavento, T., & Heikkila, A. (1997). The team climate inventory: Testing the structure of TCI in samples of low and high complexity jobs. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 375-389.
60.
Klein, J. (2000). Conditions that accelerate learning in schools . Studies in Educational Organization and Administration , 24, 57-72.
61.
Kline, P. (1998). The new psychometrics: Science, psychology and measurement. Florence, KY: Taylor and Francis/Routledge.
62.
Kruse, S.D. (2003). Remembering as an organizational memory. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(4), 332-347.
63.
Lawrence, P.R., & Lorsch, J.W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.
64.
Leithwood, K. (1998). Team learning processes. In K. Leithwood & S. K. Louis (Eds.), Organizational learning in schools (pp. 203-218). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger .
Lipshitz, R., & Popper, M. (2000). Organizational learning in a hospital. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36(3), 345-361.
67.
Lipshitz, R., Popper, M., & Friedman, V.A. (2002). Multi-facet model of organizational learning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 38, 78-98.
68.
Lipshitz, R., Popper, M., & Oz, S. (1996). Building learning organization: The design and implementation of organizational learning mechanisms. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32(3), 292-305.
69.
Lipton, L., & Melamede, R. (1997). Organizational learning: The essential journey . In A. L. Costa & R. M. Leibermann (Eds.), The process-centered school: Sustaining a renaissance community (pp. 30-53). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
70.
Louis, K.S. (1994). Beyond managed change: Rethinking how schools improve. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(1), 2-24.
71.
Louis, K.S. (2006). Changing the culture of schools: Professional community, organizational learning, and trust. Journal of School Leadership, 16(5), 477-489.
72.
Maidan, N. (1996). The influence of learning mechanisms on organizational effectiveness during planned change. Unpublished MSc thesis, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
73.
Marks, H.M., & Louis, S.K. (1999). Teacher empowerment and the capacity for organizational learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(5), 707-750.
74.
Marquardt, M.J. (1996). Building the learning organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.
75.
Mirvis, P.H. (1996). Historical foundations of organizational learning . Journal of Organizational Change Management, 9(1), 13-31.
76.
Motl, R.W., & Conroy, D.A. (2000). Confirmatory factor analysis of the physical self-efficacy scale with a college aged sample of men and women. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 4, 13-27.
77.
Mowday, R.T., Steers, R.M., & Porter, L.W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224-247.
78.
Muncey, D.E. (1994, April). Individual and school-wide change in eight coalition schools: Findings from a longitudinal ethnographic study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
79.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies foster creativity and innovation for competitive advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.
80.
Pedhazur, E.J., & Schmelkin, L.S. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
81.
Popper, M., & Lipshitz, R. (1998). Organizational learning mechanisms: A cultural and structural approach to organizational learning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 34, 161-178.
82.
Popper, M., & Lipshitz, R. (2000). Organizational learning: Mechanisms, culture and feasibility. Journal of Management Learning, 31, 181-196.
83.
Prestine, N.A. (1994, April). Sorting it out: A tentative analysis of essential school change efforts in Illinois. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association , New Orleans, LA.
84.
Reyes, P. (1990). Organizational commitment of teachers. In P. Reyes (Ed.), Teachers and their workplace: Commitment, performance and productivity (pp. 38-47). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
85.
Rifkin, W., & Fulop, L. (1997). A review and case study on learning organizations . Learning Organization, 4(4), 135-148.
86.
Sarason, S. (1993). The predictable failure of educational reform . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
87.
Schechter, C. (2005). Organizational learning mechanisms: Exploring a conceptual framework for organizational learning in schools. Journal of School Leadership, 15(5), 571-600.
88.
Schechter, C. (2006). Doubting schoolwork: Exploring an emerging concept . Teachers College Record, 108 (12), 2474-2496.
89.
Schechter, C. (2007). Learning mechanisms in schools: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Educational Theory and Practice, 29(1), 47-59.
90.
Schechter, C., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2006). Teachers' sense of collective efficacy: An international view. International Journal of Educational Management, 20(6), 480-489.
91.
Shpilberg, N. (1997). The relationship between uncertainty and organizational learning in project organizations. Unpublished MSc thesis, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
92.
Silins, H., Zarins, S., & Mulford, B. (2002). What characteristics and processes define a school as a learning organization? Is this a useful concept to apply to school?International Education Journal, 3(1), 24-32.
93.
Silins, H.C., & Mulford, W.R. (2002). Schools as learning organizations. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(5), 425-446.
94.
Silins, H.C., Mulford, W.R., & Zarins, S. (2002). Organizational learning and school change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 613-642.
95.
Sirotnik, K.A. (1980). Psychometric implications of the unit-of-analysis problem. Journal of Educational Measurement, 17, 248-284.
96.
Skrla, L., & Goddard, R.D. (2002, November). Accountability, equity, and collective efficacy in an urban school district: A mixed methods study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Pittsburgh, PA.
97.
Spender, J., & Grant, R.M. (1996). Knowledge and the firm: Overview. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 5-10.
98.
Staw, B., & Ross, J. (1987). Behaviors in escalation situations: Antecedents, prototypes and solutions. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 39-78). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
99.
Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
100.
Stevenson, R.B. (2001). Shared decision making and core school values: A case study of organizational learning. International Journal of Educational Management, 15(2), 103-120.
101.
Strain, M. (2000). Schools in a learning society: New purposes and modalities of learning in late modern society. Educational Management and Administration, 28(3), 281-298.
102.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Barr, M. (2004). Fostering student achievement: The relationship between collective teacher efficacy and student achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3, 187-207.
103.
Van de Ven, A.H., & Ferry, D.L. (1980). Measuring and assessing organizations. New York: John Wiley.
104.
Walsh, J.P. (1995). Management and organizational cognition: Notes from the strip down memory lane. Organization Science, 6(3), 280-321.
105.
Walsh, J.P., & Ungson, G.R. (1991). Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 57-91.
106.
Weick, K. (2000). Making sense of the organization. Boston: Blackwell.
107.
West, P. (1994). The concept of the learning organization. Journal of European Industrial Training, 18(1), 15-21.
108.
Wohlstetter, P., Smyer, R., & Mohrman, S.A. (1994). New boundaries for school-based management: The high involvement model. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16, 268-286.
109.
Yeung, A.K., Ulrich, P.O., Nason, S.W., & Von Glinow, M.A. (1999). Organizational learning capability: Generating and generalizing ideas and impact. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
110.
Zahra, S.G., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-221.
111.
Zempke, R. (1999). Why organizations still aren't learning. Training, 36(9), 40-42.
