Purpose: This research examined whether the removal of certification and other requirements led to larger or more diverse applicant pools for superintendent positions in Michigan. Michigan has not had any degree or certification requirements for educational administrators for many years and provided an empirical test of whether deregulation draws new talent into the field.
Research Design, Methods:The research was designed as a state-level case study employing quantitative and qualitative methods to develop descriptive findings and analytic interpretations.
Data Collection and Analysis:Data on superintendent search processes and applicant pools between 1996 and 2005 were collected. Sources of data included superintendent search files and semistructured interviews with search consultants, private sector recruiters, out-of-field superintendent candidates, professional association leaders, and other actors.
Findings: Removing certification and other requirements did not attract new talent into the field, did not stimulate new search systems, and did not generate interest among schools boards, their constituents, or other external agents. Over the 9-year period studied, superintendent applicant pools in Michigan underwent the same troubling trends in applicant pools and turnover as the nation overall.
Implications: No cavalry of talented executives lurks behind a wall of certification waiting to spread its talents to the nation's districts. Absent significant changes to a web of social, economic, and institutional factors, the likelihood that deregulation policies will affect educational leadership and school organizations is very low.
Adams, J.E., & Copeland, M. (2005). When learning counts: Rethinking licenses for school leaders. Seattle, WA: Center for Reinventing Public Education.
2.
Aguilar, L. (2006, November 16). Michigan's recent job loss compares to the Great Depression. Detroit News, p. 1.
Allen, A., & Plank, D.N. (2005). School board election structure and democratic representation. Educational Policy, 19, 510-527.
5.
Arsen, D., Plank, D., & Sykes, G. (1999). School choice policies in Michigan: The rules matter. East Lansing: Center on School Choice and Educational Change, Michigan State University.
6.
Baker, B.D., & Dickerson, J.L. (2006). Charter schools, teacher labor market deregulation, and teacher quality. Educational Policy, 20, 752-778.
7.
Ballard, C.L. (2006). Michigan's economic future. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
8.
Ballou, D. (1996). Do public schools hire the best teachers?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 97-133.
9.
Ballou, D., & Podgursky, M. (2000). Gaining control of professional licensing and advancement. In T. Loveless (Ed.), Conflicting missions? Teachers unions and educational reform (pp. 69-109). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
10.
Barnes, C., Camburn, E., Kim, J., & Rowan, B. (2004, April). School leadership and instructional improvement in CSR schools. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference in San Diego, CA.
11.
Berger, P.L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday.
12.
Boyd, W., Plank, D.N., & Sykes, G. (2000). Teachers unions in hard times. In T. Loveless (Ed.), Conflicting missions? Teachers unions and educational reform (pp. 174-210). Washington, DC : Brookings Institution.
13.
Broad, E. (2003, April). School boards: Part of the solution or part of the problem?The Jacqueline P. Danzinger Lecture, San Francisco.
14.
Bryk, A.S., Thum, Y.M., Easton, J.Q., & Luppescu, S. (1997). Assessing school academic productivity: The case of Chicago school reform. Journal of Social Psychology ofEducation, 2, 103-142.
15.
Bulkley, K., & Fisler, J. (2002). A decade of charter schools: From theory to practice . Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
16.
Carley, K.M., & Hill, V. (2001). Structural change and learning within organizations . In A. Lomi & E. R. Larsen, (Eds.), Dynamics of organizations: Computational modeling and organizational theories (pp. 63-92). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cibulka, J., Ryan, P., & Hill, P. (2001, Winter). Round and round they go: Take my school district, please. Education Next, 4, 2-27.
19.
Cohen, D., Raudenbush, S.W., & Ball Loewenberg, D. (2003). Resources, instruction and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 1-24.
20.
Collins, J. (2001). Good to great: Why some companies make the leap and others don't. New York: HarperCollins .
21.
Cooper, B.S., Fusarelli, L.D., & Carella, V.A. (2002). Career crisis in the superintendency: The results of a national survey series. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
22.
Coulson, A.J. (1996). Markets versus monopolies in education: The historical evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 4(9). Retrieved December 14, 2005, from http://olam.ed.asu.edu/epaa/v1994n1999.html
23.
Cuban, L. (2005). The blackboard and the bottom line. Why schools can't be businesses. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Cuban, L., & Usdan, M. (2003) Powerful reforms with shallow roots: Improving America's urban schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
25.
Danzberger, J.P. (1994). Governing the nation's schools: The case for restructuring local school boards. Phi Delta Kappan,75, 367-373.
26.
Davis, S., Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., & Meyerson, D. (2005). School leadership study: Developing successful principals. Stanford, CA: Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.
27.
Education Commission of the States. (2007). Administrator license requirements, portability, waivers and alternative certification . Retrieved May 9, 2007, from http://mb2.ecs.org/reports/Report.aspx?id=859
28.
Eiter, M. (2002). Best practices in leadership development: Lessons from the best business schools and corporate universities. In M. S. Tucker & J. B. Codding (Eds.), The principal challenge: Leading and managing schools in an era of accountability (pp. 99-122). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29.
Elmore, R. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership . New York: Albert Shanker Institute .
30.
Elmore, R. (2004). School reform from the inside out. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
Engler, J. (1993). Our kids deserve better. The governor's address on school reform. Lansing: State of Michigan.
32.
Engler, J. (1999). Michigan: Setting priorities straight. In M. Kanstoroom & C. Finn (Eds.), New directions: Federal education policy in the twenty-first century (pp. 117-120). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
33.
Findley, W., & Coverdill, J.E. (2002). Headhunters: Matchmakers in the labor market. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
34.
Finn, C.E. (2006, November 8). Creating new leaders in the charter sector. The Ohio Education Gadfly, 1(23), 1.
35.
Firestone, W.A., & Riehl, C. (2005). A new agenda for research on educational leadership . New York: Teachers College Press .
36.
Friedman, M. (1995). Public schools: Make them private (Briefing Paper 23). Washington, DC: Cato Institute .
37.
Fuller, H., Campbell, C., Celio, M.B., Harvey, J., Immerwahr, J., & Winger, A. (2003). An impossible job? The view from the urban superintendent's chair. Seattle, WA: Center for Reinventing Public Education.
38.
Garber, M. (2001). The amateur professional and the professional amateur. In M. Garber (Ed.), Academic instincts (pp. 3-52). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
Gewirtz, S., & Ball, S. (2000). From “welfarism” to “new managerialism”: Shifting discourses of school headship in the education marketplace. Discourse, 21, 253-268.
40.
Glass, T. (2000, November 8). The shrinking applicant pool. Education Week, 20(10), 68.
41.
Glass, T., Björk, L., & Brunner, C. (Eds.). (2000). The study of the American superintendency 2000: A look at the superintendent in the new millennium. Arlington VA: American Association of School Administrators.
42.
Gleick, J. (1988). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Penguin.
43.
Green, R.L., & Carl, B. (2000). A reform for troubles times: Takeovers of urban schools. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 569, 56-70.
44.
Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. New York: Harper Business.
45.
Harris, D., & Plank, D. (2004). Who's teaching in Michigan's traditional and charter public schools. East Lansing: The Education Policy Center at Michigan State University.
46.
Headley, L. (1995, February 3). K—12 education reform: What to expect in 1995. The Advisor. Retrieved, August 2, 2006, from http://www.publicsectorconsultants.com/documents/PSR/Adv/1995/020395.cfm
47.
Heck, R.H. (1992) Principals' instructional leadership and school performance: Implications for policy development. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 21-34.
48.
Helyar, J., & Lublin, J.S. (1998, January 21). Do you need to be an expert on wigits to be CEO of a wigit company?The Wall Street Journal, p. A1.
49.
Henig, J.R., & Rich, W.C. (2004). Mayors in the middle: Politics, race, and mayoral control of urban schools. Rutgers, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
Herrington, C.D., & Wills, B.K. (2005). Decertifying the principalship: The politics of administrator preparation in Florida. Educational Policy, 19, 181-200.
51.
Hess, F.M. (2003a). A license to lead? A new leadership agenda for America's schools. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.
Hess, F.M. (2004). Common sense school reform. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
54.
Hess F.M., & Kelley, A.P. (2005). Learning to lead: What gets taught in principal preparation program. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
55.
Hodgkinson, H.L., & Montenegro, X. (1999). The U.S. school superintendent: The invisible CEO. Washington, DC: Superintendents Prepared, Institute for Educational Leadership.
56.
House, E.R. (1998). Schools for sale: Why free market policies won't improve America's schools, and what will. New York: Teachers College Press.
57.
Hoxby, C.M. (2002). Would school choice change the teaching profession?Journal of Human Resources, 37, 846-891.
Hurwitz, S. (2001). The new outsiders: Can a new breed of noneducator superintendents transform urban school systems?American School Board Journal. Retrieved January1, 2006, from http://www.asbj.com/2001/06/0601coverstory.html
60.
Innovations in education: Innovative pathways to school leadership. (2006). Retrieved January20, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/admins/recruit/prep/alternative/report_pg4.html#intro
61.
Kennedy, M.M. (2004, April 7). Reform ideals and teachers' practical intentions. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(13). Retrieved February 2, 2007, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n13/
62.
Khurana, R. (2002). Searching for a corporate savior. Rutgers, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63.
Kingdon, J.W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. White Plains, NY: Longman.
64.
Kirst, M.W. (2002). Mayoral influence, new regimes and public school governance. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
65.
Knapp, M.S., Copland, M.A., Ford, B., Markholt, A., McLaughlin, M.W., Milliken, M., et al. (2003). Leading for learning sourcebook: Concepts and examples. Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
66.
LaFee, S. (2004). Outside the ropes: Superintendents from business and the military learn about system leadership informally and in seminars . School Administrator, 61(10), 34.
67.
Levine, A. (2005). Educating school leaders. New York: Teachers College.
68.
Lubienski, C. (2001). Institutionalist and instrumentalist perspectives on “public” education: Strategies: Implications of the school choice movement in Michigan. New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education.
69.
March, J.G., & Olsen, J.P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Macmillan .
70.
Maxwell, L.A. (2006, June 21). Challenging the status quo. Education Week. Retrieved October 15, 2006, from http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?index=49&did=1090642741&SrchMode=1&sid=3&Fmt=3&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&TS=1185233842&clientId=3552
71.
McCarthy, M. (2004). Point/counterpoint: The continuing debate about standards and assessments for school leaders. University Council forEducational Administration Review, 46(2), 1.
72.
Mintrom, M. (2000). Leveraging local innovation: The case of Michigan's charter schools. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
73.
Miron, G., & Nelson, C. (2002). What's public about charter schools? Lessons learned about choice and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
74.
Murphy, J. (2000). Governing America's schools: The shifting playing field. Teachers College Press, 102(1), 57-84.
75.
Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. (1992). Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
76.
PA 335 of the Public Acts of 1993 Section 1536 of Part 21A of PA 335 (1993).
77.
PA 289 of the Public Acts of 1995 Section 1244 of Part 16 of PA 289 (1995).
78.
Peters, T.J. (1992). Liberation management: Necessary disorganization for the nanosecond nineties. New York: Knopf.
79.
Peterson, P.E. (2001). Choice in American Education. In T. E. Moe (Ed.), A primer on America's schools (pp. 249-283). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution.
80.
Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C.T. (2002). The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning & Education , 1(1). Retrieved January 12, 2007, from http://www.aomonline.org/Publications/Articles/BSchools.asp
81.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G.R. (2003). The external control of organizations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
82.
Quick, H.E., Beatrice, F., Birman, B.F., Gallagher, L.P., Wolman, L., Chaney, K., et al. (2003). Evaluation of the Blueprint for Student Success. Year 2 interim report. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
83.
Reed, L.W. (1996, January). Education reform: Lessons from Michigan. Presentation to forum of the PioneerInstitute for Public Policy Research, Boston.
84.
Roza, M. (2003, January). A matter of definition: Is there truly a shortage of school principals? Center on Reinventing PublicEducation, 11-27.
85.
Russo, A. (2004, Summer). The waiting game. Education Next, 3, 46-51.
86.
Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. New York: Harper & Row.
Stover, D. (2002). Looking for leaders. American School Board Journal, 189(12), 38.
89.
Thomas B.Fordham Foundation. (2003). Better leaders for America's schools: A manifesto. Washington, DC: Author.
90.
Usdan, M. (2004). Board governance and external constituencies. In F. M. Hess (Ed.), Urban school reform: Lessons from San Diego (pp. 11-32). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
91.
Waterman, R.H. (1990). Adhocracy: The power to change. Knoxville, TN: Whittle Direct Books.
92.
Waters, T., Marzano, R.J., & McNulty, B. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
93.
Williams, J. (2006, Spring). Breaking the mold. Education Next, 2, 43-49.
94.
Wong, K.K., & Shen, F.Z. (2003a). Big city mayors and school governance reform: The case of school district takeover. Peabody Journal of Education , 78(1), 5-32.
95.
Wong, K.K., & Shen, F.Z. (2003b). Measuring the effectiveness of city and state takeover as a school reform strategy. Peabody Journal of Education , 78(4), 89-119.
96.
Yin, R.K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
97.
Young, M.D., Crow, G., Orr, T.M., Ogawa, R., & Creighton, T. (2005). An educative look at Educating School Leaders . Retrieved May 24, 2006, from www.ucea.org/pdf/EducLeadersRespMar18.pdf
