Purpose : This study examines the factors that predict who among those receiving educational administration doctorates is most likely to become a faculty member. Research Design: The study uses 10 years of data on all doctoral recipients from programs in educational administration gathered from the Survey of Earned Doctorates (1990 to 2000). Statistical models, using logistic regression, determined which variables (preparation, experience, and personal) best predicted whether graduates pursued postsecondary academic careers. A separate model determined which variables predicted the likelihood of holding a graduate assistantship (the best predictor of a faculty career). A third model determined the variables that best predicted the selectivity of an individual's undergraduate institution.Findings: The study found that 19% of doctoral recipients in educational administration pursue faculty careers. The best predictors of becoming a faculty member were attending a research university full time, holding an assistantship, being single, having no children, and being younger than age 30. A second track to the professoriat is also evident. Many who pursue faculty careers are older, worked full time in graduate school, and held faculty positions before they graduated.Conclusions : More research is needed about the second track to the educational professoriat. From a policy perspective, questions remain about the characteristics most desired for those training future school administrators as well as future educational administration faculty.
Baker, B.D., Orr, M.T., & Young, M.D. (2006). Academic drift, institutional production and the professional distribution of graduate degrees in educational administration [Working paper]. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas, Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies .
2.
Barron's Guide to the Most Competitive Colleges (3rd ed.). (2003). Great Neck, NY: Barron's Educational Series.
3.
Barron's Profiles of American Colleges (23rd ed.). (1998). Great Neck, NY: Barron's Educational Series.
4.
Boice, R. (1992). The new faculty member. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Burke, D. (1988). A new academic marketplace. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
6.
Caplow, T., & McGee, R. (1958). The academic labor marketplace. New York: Basic Books.
7.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (1994). Carnegie classification of institutions of higher education. Stanford, CA: Author .
8.
Clark, B.R. (1987). The academic life: Small worlds, different worlds . Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
9.
Donmoyer, R., Imber, M., & Scheurich, J.J. (1995). The knowledge base in educational administration: Multiple perspectives. Albany, NY: State University of New York.
10.
Finn, C.E., Broad, E., Meyer, L., & Feistritzer, E. (2003). Better leaders for America's schools. A manifesto. New York: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
11.
Finnegan, D. (1993). Segmentation in the academic labor market: Hiring cohorts in comprehensive universities. Journal of Higher Education , 64, 621-56.
12.
Golde, C.M., & Dore, T.M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of today's doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia : Pew Charitable Trusts.
13.
Hess, F.M., & Kelly, A. (2005a). Learning to lead? What gets taught in principal preparation programs. Retrieved August 1, 2005, from American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Available at http://www.aei.org/docLib/20050517_Learning_to_Lead.pdf
14.
Hess, F.M., & Kelly, A. (2005b). Textbook leadership? An analysis of leading books used in principal preparation. Retrieved August 1, 2005, from http://www.aei.org/docLib/20050517_Textbook_Leadership.pdf
15.
Jackson, B.L., & Kelley, C. (2002). Educational and innovative programs in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 5-13.
16.
Levine, A. (2005). Educating school leaders: The education schools project. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
17.
Lewis, L.S. (1975). Scaling the ivory tower: Merit and its limits in academic careers. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18.
McCarthy, M.M., & Kuh, G.D. (1997). Continuity and change: The educational leadership professoriate. Columbia, MO: University Council for Educational Administration.
19.
McCarthy, M.M., Kuh, G.D., Newell, L.J., & Iacona, C.M. (1988). Under scrutiny: The educational administration professoriate. Tempe, AZ: University Council for Educational Administration.
20.
Millimet, D. (2001). Endogeneity versus sample selection bias. Retrieved March 1, 2006, from http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/bias.html
21.
Miskel, C. (1988, October). Research and the preparation of educational administrators. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Cincinnati, OH.
22.
Murphy, J., & Vriesenga, M. (2004). Research on preparation programs in educational administration: An analysis. Columbia, MO: University Council for Educational Administration.
23.
National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System [Data file]. Available from http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds
24.
National Commission on Excellence in Educational Administration. (1987). Leaders for American schools: The report of the National Commission on Excellence in Educational Administration . Tempe, AZ: University Council for Educational Administration.
25.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (1990-2000). Survey of Earned Doctorates [Microdata file]. Available from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/survey.cfm
26.
Ogawa, R.T., Goldring, E.B., & Conley, S. (2000). Organizing the field to improve research on educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 340-357.
27.
Perna, L.W. (2001). The relationship between family responsibilities and employment status. Journal of Higher Education, 72, 584-611.
28.
Pounder, D.G. (2000). A discussion of the task force's collective findings . Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 465-473.
29.
Pounder, D.G., Crow, G.M., & Bergerson, A.A. (2004). Job desirability of the university professorate in the field of educational leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 14, 497-529.
30.
Riehl, C., Larson, C.L., Short, P.M., & Reitzug, U.C. (2000). Reconceptualizing research and scholarship in educational administration: Learning to know, knowing to do, and doing to learn. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 391-427.
31.
Wolf-Wendel, L.E. (1998). Models of excellence: The baccalaureate origins of successful European American women, African American women and Latinas . Journal of Higher Education, 69, 144-172.
32.
Wolf-Wendel, L.E., Baker, B.D., Twombly, S., Tollefson, N., & Mahlios, M. (2006). Who's Teaching the Teachers? Evidence from the National Survey of Postsecondary Faculty and the Survey of Earned Doctorates . American Journal of Education, 112, 273-300.
33.
Youn, T. (1988). Studies of academic markets and careers: An historical review. In D. Breneman and T. Youn (Eds.), Academic labor markets and careers (pp. 8-27). New York: Falmer .
