Mental models are described and discussed as a means of communicating the underlying aspects of instructional leadership. An empirical study identifying the mental models of instructional leadership held by three urban elementary school principals at different stages in their careers was used to support the thesis. Using a collective case study design, the similarities and differences in mental models of a novice principal and two experienced principals, one of whom was an award winning principal, were examined. The results demonstrated differing levels of integration as well as variation regarding the conceptualization of instructional leadership. This study underscored the usefulness of the mental model concept in discussing instructional leadership.
Allison, D. J., & Allison, P. A. (1993). Both ends of a telescope: Experience and expertise in principal problem solving. Educational Administration Quarterly, 29, 302-322.
2.
Argyris, C. (1993). Knowledge for action: A guide to overcoming barriers to organizational change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
Berliner, D. C. (1988). Development of expertise in pedagogy. New York: Teachers College Press.
4.
Blase, J., & Blase, J. R. (1999). Principal’s instructional leadership and teacher development: Teacher’s perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 349-378.
5.
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (1997). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Brewer, W.F. (1987). Schemas versus mental models in human memory. In P. Morris (Ed.), Modeling cognition (pp. 187-198). New York: John Wiley.
7.
Copland, M. A. (1999). Problem-based learning, problem framing ability and the principal selves of prospective school principals (Administration). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60 (08) 2750A. (UMI No. 19943639).
8.
Copland, M., Darling-Hammond, L., Knapp, M. S., McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2002, April). Leadership for teaching and learning: A framework for research and action. Symposium presented at the Annual Convention of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
9.
Fauske, J. R., & Johnson, B. L. (2000, November). Principals’mental models for interacting with the extended school community. Paper presented at the University Council for Educational Administration Annual Conference, Albuquerque, NM.
10.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. (M. Bergman Ramos, Trans.). New York: Continuum.
11.
Fullan, M. G. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. School development and the management of change, Vol. 10. New York: Falmer.
12.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
13.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1980). Mental models in cognitive science. Cognitive science, 4, 71-115.
14.
Kim, D. H. (1993). The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, 35, 37-51.
15.
Lashway, L. (2003). Transforming principal preparation. ERIC Digest, 165.
16.
Leithwood, K. A. (1988). The nature, causes and consequences of principals’ practices: A framework for research and review of recent literature. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC document Reproduction Service No. ED 298626).
17.
Leithwood, K. A., & Duke, D. L. (1998). Mapping the conceptual terrain of leadership: A critical point of departure for cross-cultural studies. Peabody Journal of Education, 73, 31-50.
18.
Leithwood, K. A., & Montgomery, D. J. (1986). Improving principal effectiveness: The principal profile. Toronto, Canada: OISE Press.
19.
Leithwood, K. A., & Stager, M. (1989). Expertise in principals’ problem solving. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25, 126-161.
20.
Leithwood, K. A., Steinbach, R., & Raun, T. (1993). Superintendents’ group problem-solving processes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 29, 364-391.
21.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage.
22.
Lord, R. G., & Foti, R. J. (1986). Schema theories, information processing, and organizational behavior. In H. P. Sims & D. A. Gioia (Eds.), The thinking organization: Dynamics of organizational social cognition (pp. 24-52). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23.
Margolis, H. (1987). Patterns, thinking, and cognition: A theory of judgment. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
24.
Marsh, D. D. (2000). Educational leadership for the twenty-first century: Integrating three essential perspectives. The Jossey-Bass reader on educational leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25.
Murphy, J., & Louis, K. S. (1994). Reshaping the principalship: Insights from transformational reform efforts.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
26.
Nestor-Baker, N., & Hoy W. K. (2000, November). The hidden curriculum of school district leadership: Tacit knowledge and school superintendent success. Paper presented at the University Council for Educational Administration Annual Conference, Albuquerque, NM.
27.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Public Law 107-110 (2001).
28.
Raybould, R. (2000, November). Mental models: New understandings for a new millennium. Paper presented at the University Council for Educational Administration Annual Conference, Albuquerque, NM.
29.
Reitzug, U. C. (1997). Images of principal instructional leadership: From super-vision to collaborative inquiry. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 12, 324-343.
30.
Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 769-802). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Sarason, S. B. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change course before it’s too late?San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32.
Sarason, S. B. (2002). Educational reform: A self-scrutinizing memoir. New York: Teachers College Press.
33.
Schank, R. C., & Albelson, R.P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership (2nded.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35.
Schon, D. A. (1967) Displacement of concepts. London: Tavistock.
36.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
37.
Sergiovanni, T. J., & Starratt, R. J. (1993). Supervision: A redefinition (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
38.
Silva, D. Y., Gimbert, B., & Nolan, J. F. (2000). Sliding the door: Locking and unlocking possibilities for teacher leadership. Teachers College Record, 102, 779-804.
39.
Stake, R. E. (2000). Case Studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Stevens, E., Wood, G. H., & Sheehan, J. J. (2002). Justice, ideology, education: An introduction to the foundations of education (4th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
41.
Tye, B. B. (2000). Hard truths: Uncovering the deep structure of schooling. New York: Teachers College Press.
42.
Wheatley, M. J. (2000). Good-bye, command and control. In The Jossey-Bass reader on educational leadership (pp. 339-347). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
