This article examines 20th-century longitudinal data on the American superintendency’s composition by sex. The authors analyze and discuss those data in the light of occupational sex segregation theory to illuminate complexities associated with women’s in roads into historically male work. The authors’ overarching purpose is to deepen understanding of the contemporary superintendency by building on historical and feminist scholarship, situating findings in their social contexts, and considering possibilities for the future.
Amsden, A. (1980). The economics of women and work. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
2.
Bae, Y., Choy, S., Geddes, C., Sable, J., & Snyder, T. (2000). Trends in educational equity of girls and women. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
3.
Banks, C. (1995). Gender and race as factors in educational leadership and administration. In J. Banks & C. McGee Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 65-80). New York: Macmillan.
4.
Barker, S. (1997). Is your successor in your schoolhouse?NASSP Bulletin, 81(592), 85-91.
5.
Beekley, C. (1999). Dancing in red shoes: Why women leave the superintendency. In C. C. Brunner (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency (pp. 161-175). Albany: State University of New York Press.
6.
Bell, C. (1988). Organizational influences on women’s experience in the superintendency. Peabody Journal of Education, 65(4), 31-59.
7.
Bell, C. (1995). If I weren’t involved with schools, I might be a radical. In D. Dunlap & P. Schmuck (Eds.), Women leading in education (pp. 288-312). Albany: State University of New York Press.
8.
Bell, C., & Chase, S. (1993). The underrepresentation of women in school leadership. In C. Marshall (Ed.), The new politics of race and gender (pp. 141-154). Washington, DC: Falmer.
9.
Beneria, L. (1988). Conceptualizing the labour force: The underestimation of women’s economic activities. In R. E. Pahl (Ed.), On work: Historical, comparative, and theoretical approaches (pp. 372-391). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
10.
Biklen, S., & Brannigan, M. (Eds.). (1980). Women and educational leadership. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
11.
Bjork, L. (2000). Professional preparation and training. In T. Glass, L. Bjork, & C. Brunner (Eds.), The study of the American school superintendency, 2000 (pp. 127-166). Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
12.
Bjork, L., & Keedy, J. (2003a). Guest editors’ introduction: Who will lead? Examining the superintendent shortage. Journal of School Leadership, 13(3), 256-263.
13.
Bjork, L., & Keedy, J. (2003b). The superintendent shortage: Myth or reality? [Special issue]. Journal of School Leadership, 13(3).
14.
Blau, F. (1984a). Concluding remarks. In B. F. Reskin (Ed.), Sex segregation in the workplace: Trends, explanations, remedies (pp. 310-313). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
15.
Blau, F. (1984b). Occupational segregation and labor market discrimination. In B. F. Reskin (Ed.), Sex segregation in the workplace: Trends, explanations, remedies (pp. 117-143). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16.
Bloch, R. (1978, June). American feminine ideas in transition. Feminist Studies, 4, 101-126.
17.
Blount, J. M. (1998). Destined to rule the schools: Women and the superintendency, 1873-1995. Albany: State University of New York Press.
18.
Borg, W., & Gall, M. (1989). Educational research: An introduction (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
19.
Brown, K. (1998). Divided labours: An evolutionary view of women at work. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
Brunner, C. (Ed.). (1999). Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency. Albany: State University of New York Press.
21.
Brunner, C., & Bjork, L. (2001). The new superintendency. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
22.
Burstyn, J. N. (1980). Historical perspectives on women in educational leadership. In S. Biklen & M. Brannigan (Eds.), Women in educational leadership (pp. 65-75). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
23.
Carlson, R. O. (1961). Succession and performance among school superintendents. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6, 210-227.
24.
Carlson, R. O. (1972). School superintendents: Careers and performance. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
25.
Carter, D., Glass, T., & Hord, S. (1993). Selecting, preparing, and developing the school district superintendent. Washington, DC: Falmer.
26.
Carter, G., & Cunningham, W. (1997). The American school superintendency: Leading in an age of pressure. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Chase, S. (1995). Ambiguous empowerment: The work narratives of women superintendents. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
28.
Chase, S., & Bell, C. (1990). Ideology, discourse, and gender: How gatekeepers talk about women school superintendents. Social Problems, 37(2), 163-177.
29.
Complete dictionary of English and Hebrew first names. (1984). Middle Village, NY: Jonathan David.
30.
Cooper, B., Fusarelli, L., & Carella, V. (2000). Career crisis in the school superintendency? The results of a national survey. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
31.
Cordray, D. (2001). Secondary analysis: Methodology. In N. Smelser & P. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 20, pp. 13777-13780). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
32.
Davies, M. (1982). Woman’s place is at the typewriter: Office work and office workers, 1870-1930. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
33.
Davis, H., & Samuelson, A. (1950). Women in education. Journal of Social Issues, 6(3), 32-34.
34.
Driver, L. (1922). Report of the committee on the county superintendents’ problems. In Addresses and proceedings of the National Education Association (pp. 293-303). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
35.
Duncan, O., & Duncan, B. (1957). The Negro population of Chicago: A study of residential succession. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
Dunlap, D., & Schmuck, P. (Eds.). (1995). Women leading in education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
37.
Edwards, R. (1975). The social relations of production in the firm and labor market structure. In R. Edwards, M. Reich, & D. Gordon (Eds.), Labor market segmentation (pp. 3-26). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
38.
Ehrlich, E., Flexner, S., Carruth, G., & Hawkins, J. (Eds.). (1980). Oxford American dictionary. New York: Oxford University Press.
39.
Esparo, L. (2000). Leadership under pressure: The administrator crisis in our public schools. Providence, RI: Brown University, Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratory.
40.
Estler, S. (1975). Women as leaders in public education. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1(2), 363-386.
41.
Fenwick, L., & Pierce, M. (2001, March). The principal shortage: Crisis or opportunity?Principal Magazine. Retrieved August 25, 2001, from http://www.naesp.org/comm/p0301a.htm
42.
Fusarelli, L., Cooper, B., & Carella, V. (2003). Who will serve? An analysis of superintendent occupational perceptions, career satisfaction, and mobility. Journal of School Leadership, 13(3), 304-327.
43.
Gardiner, M., Enomoto, E., & Grogan, M. (2000). Coloring outside the lines: Mentoring women into school leadership. Albany: State University of New York Press.
44.
Glass, T. (1992). The 1992 study of the American school superintendency. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
45.
Glass, T. (2000). Professional experience. In T. Glass, L. Bjork, & C. Brunner (Eds.), The study of the American school superintendency 2000 (pp. 33-52). Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
46.
Glass, T., & Bjork, L. (2003). The superintendent shortage: Findings from research on school board presidents. Journal of School Leadership, 13(3), 264-287.
47.
Glass, T., Bjork, L., & Brunner, C. (2000). The study of the American school superintendency, 2000. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
48.
Goldin, C. (1990). Understanding the gender gap: An economic history of American workers. New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
Grady, M. L. (1992). Women in educational administration: Certified but not employed. Educational Considerations, 20(1), 33-36.
50.
Grady, M. L. (1995). Building a network for women in educational administration. In B. Irby & G. Brown (Eds.), Women as school executives: Voices and visions (pp. 121-126). Austin: Texas Council for Women School Executives.
51.
Gribskov, M. (1980). Feminism and the woman school administrator. In S. Biklen & M. Brannigan (Eds.), Women in educational leadership (pp. 77-92). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
52.
Grogan, M. (1999). A feminist poststructuralist account of collaboration. In C. C. Brunner (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency (pp. 199-216). Albany: State University of New York Press.
53.
Grogan, M. (2000). Laying the groundwork for a reconception of the superintendency from feminist postmodern perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(1), 117-142.
54.
Grogan, M., & Henry, M. (1995). Women candidates for the superintendency: Board perspectives. In B. Irby&G. Brown (Eds.), Women as school executives: Voices and visions (pp.164-174). Austin: Texas Council for Women School Executives.
55.
Gross, E. (1968). The sexual structure of occupations over time. Social Problems, 16, 198-208.
56.
Hansot, E., & Tyack, D. (1981, May). The dream deferred: A golden age for women school administrators (Policy Paper No. 81-C2). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Institute for Research on Educational Finance and Governance.
57.
Hawthorne, M. (1929, May). The position of women in public schools. Annals, 232, 156-157.
58.
Hodgkinson, H., & Montenegro, X. (1999). The U.S. school superintendent: The invisible CEO. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.
59.
Irby, B., & Brown, G. (1995). Women as school executives: Voices and vision. Austin: Texas Council of Women School Executives.
60.
Jacob, H. (1984). Using published data: Errors and remedies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
61.
Kamler, E., & Shakeshaft, C. (1999). The role of search consultants in the career paths of women superintendents. In C. C. Brunner (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency (pp. 51-62). Albany: State University of New York Press.
62.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
63.
Kowalski, T. (2003). Superintendent shortage: The wrong problem and wrong solutions. Journal of School Leadership, 13(3), 288-303.
64.
Krathwohl, D. (1998). Methods of educational and social science research: An integrated approach. New York: Longman.
65.
Leslie, C. (1987, September). Making doctors human. Newsweek on Campus, pp. 39-40.
66.
Luxenberg, S. (1985). Roadside empires. New York: Viking.
67.
Marshall, C. (1993). The new politics of race and gender. Washington, DC: Falmer.
68.
Mason, K. O. (1984). Commentary: Strober’s theory of occupational sex segregation. In B. F. Reskin (Ed.), Sex segregation in the workplace: Trends, explanations, remedies (pp. 157-170). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
69.
Matthaei, J. (1982). An economic history of women in America: Women’s work, the sexual division of labor, and the development of capitalism. New York: Schocken.
70.
McCarthy, M. (1999). The evolution of educational leadership preparation programs. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 119-139). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
71.
McCarthy, M., & Kuh, G. (1997). Continuity and change: The educational leadership professoriate. Columbia, MO: University Council for Educational Administration.
72.
Middleton, C. (1988). The familiar fate of the famulae: Gender divisions in the history of wage labour. In R. E. Pahl (Ed.), On work: Historical, comparative, and theoretical approaches (pp. 21-47). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
73.
Miklos, E. (1988). Administrator selection, career patterns, succession, and socialization. In N. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 53-76). New York: Longman.
74.
Milstein & Associates. (1993). Changing the way we prepare educational leaders: The Danforth experience. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
75.
Montenegro, X. (1993). Women and racial minority representation in school administration. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
76.
Muntemba, S. (1988). Women as food producers and suppliers in the 20th century: The case of Zambia. In R. E. Pahl (Ed.), On work: Historical, comparative, and theoretical approaches (pp. 407-427). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
77.
Murphy, J. (Ed.). (1993). Preparing tomorrows’ school leaders: Alternative designs. University Park, PA: University Council for Educational Administration.
78.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
79.
Oppenheimer, V. (1970). The female labor force in the U.S.: Demographic and economic factors governing its growth and changing composition. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
80.
Ortiz, F. I. (1982). Career patterns in educational administration: Women, men, and minorities. New York: Praeger.
81.
Ortiz, F. I., & Marshall, C. (1988). Women in educational administration. In N. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 123-142). New York: Longman.
82.
Pahl, R. E. (Ed.). (1988). On work: Historical, comparative, and theoretical approaches. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
83.
Patterson, H. (Ed.). (1998). Patterson’s American education. Mt. Prospect, IL: Educational Directories.
84.
Patterson, M., & Engleberg, L. (1978). Women in male-dominated professions. In A. Stromberg & S. Harkness (Eds.), Women working: Theories and facts in perspective (pp. 132-151). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
85.
Pigford, A., & Tonnsen, S. (1993). Women in school leadership: Survival and advancement guidebook. Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
86.
Pounder, D., & Merrill, R. (2001). Job desirability of the high school principalship: A job choice theory perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(1), 27-57.
87.
Redclift, N. (1988). Gender, accumulation, and the labour process. In R. E. Pahl (Ed.), On work: Historical, comparative, and theoretical approaches (pp. 428-448). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
88.
Reskin, B. (1984). Introduction. In B. F. Reskin (Ed.), Sex segregation in the workplace: Trends, explanations, remedies (pp. 1-7). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
89.
Reskin, B., & Roos, P. (1990). Job queues, gender queues: Explaining women’s inroads into male occupations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
90.
Richards, C. (1988). The search for equity in educational administration. In N. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 159-168). New York: Longman.
91.
Rose, R. (1969). Career sponsorship in the school superintendency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
92.
Roster of nontraditional superintendents. (2001). School Administrator, 58(6), 8.
93.
Sadker, M., Sadker, D., & Klein, S. (1991). The issue of gender in elementary and secondary education. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 17, pp. 269-334). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
94.
Schmuck, P. (1980). Changing women’s representation in school management. In S. Biklen & M. Brannigan (Eds.), Women in educational leadership (pp. 239-259). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
95.
Schmuck, P. (1995). Advocacy organizations for women administrators, 1977-1993. In D. Dunlap & P. Schmuck (Eds.), Women leading in education (pp. 199-224). Albany: State University of New York Press.
96.
Schmuck, P., & Charters, W. W. (Eds.). (1981). Educational policy and management: Sex differentials. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
97.
Schwartz, F. (1992). Breaking with tradition: Women and work, the new facts of life. New York: Warner Books.
98.
Shakeshaft, C. (1989). Women in educational administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
99.
Shakeshaft, C. (1999). The struggle to create a more gender-inclusive profession. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 99-118). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
100.
Skrla, L. (1999, April). Femininity/masculinity: Hegemonic normalizations in the public school superintendency. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
101.
Skrla, L., Reyes, P., & Scheurich, J. (2000). Sexism, silence, and solutions: Women superintendents speak up and speak out. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 44-75.
102.
Snyder, T. (Ed.). (1993). 120 years of American education: A statistical portrait. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
103.
Stewart, D., & Kamins, M. (1993). Secondary research: Information sources and methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
104.
Strober, M. (1984). Toward a general theory of occupational sex segregation: The case of public school teaching. In B. F. Reskin (Ed.), Sex segregation in the workplace: Trends, explanations, remedies (pp. 144-156). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
105.
Strober, M., & Tyack, D. (1981). Jobs and gender: A history of the structuring of educational employment by sex. In P. Schmuck & W. Charters (Eds.), Educational policy and management: Sex differentials (pp. 247-274). San Diego: Academic Press.
106.
Tallerico, M. (1999). Women and the superintendency: What do we really know? In C. Brunner (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency (pp. 29-48). Albany: State University of New York Press.
107.
Tallerico, M. (2000a). Accessing the superintendency: The unwritten rules. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press/American Association of School Administrators.
108.
Tallerico, M. (2000b). Gaining access to the superintendency: Headhunting, gender, and color. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(1), 18-43.
109.
Tallerico, M. (2003). Policy, structural, and school board influences on superintendent supply and demand. Journal of School Leadership, 13(3), 347-364.
110.
Tallerico, M., & Burstyn, J. (1996). Retaining women in the superintendency: The location matters. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 642-664.
111.
Tallerico, M., Burstyn, J., & Poole, W. (1993). Gender and politics at work: Why women exit the superintendency. Fairfax, VA: National Policy Board for Educational Administration.
112.
Tallerico, M., & O’Connell, R. (2001). Women and men in the superintendency: A case of a promising research alliance. In C. Brunner & L. Bjork (Eds.), The new superintendency: Advances in research and theories of school management and educational policy (pp. 75-86). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
113.
Tallerico, M., & Tingley, S. (2001). The leadership mismatch: An alternative view. School Administrator, 58(10), 23-27.
114.
Thurow, L. (1972, Summer). Education and economic equality. Public Interest, 28, 66-81.
115.
Tiger, L., & Shepher, J. (1975). Women in the kibbutz. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
116.
Title IX Educational Amendment of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681.
117.
Tyack, D., & Hansot, E. (1982). Managers of virtue: Public school leadership in America, 1820-1980. New York: Basic Books.
118.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2001). Statistical abstract of the United States. Retrieved May 30, 2003, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2002pubs/01statab/labor
119.
Volp, F., Archambault, P., Service, R., Terranova, M., Whitehill, W., Brown, C., et al. (2001). Snapshot 2000: A study of school superintendents in New York State. Albany: New York State Council of School Superintendents.
120.
Welter, B. (1966, Summer). The cult of true womanhood. American Quarterly, 18, 151-174.
121.
West, J. (1982). Women, work, and the labor market. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
122.
Women’s Educational Equity Act. (1984). Catching up: A review of the Women’s Educational Equity Act programs. Washington, DC: the Citizen’s Council on Women’s Educational Equity.
123.
Yeakey, C., Johnston, G., & Adkison, J. (1986). In pursuit of equity: A review of research on minorities and women in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22(3), 110-149.
124.
Young, M. (2003). Troubling policy discourse. In M. Young & L. Skrla (Eds.), Reconsidering feminist research in educational leadership (pp. 265-298). Albany: State University of New York Press.
125.
Zeigler, L., Kehoe, E., & Reisman, J. (1985). City managers and school superintendents: Response to community conflict. New York: Praeger.
