Persistent achievement gaps by race and class in U.S. public schools are educationally and ethically deplorable and, thus, need to be eliminated. Based on their research on schools and districts that haven arrowed these gaps, the authors have developed a simplified reconceptualization of equity auditing, a concept with a respected history in civil rights, in curriculum auditing, and in some state accountability systems. This reconceptualized equity auditing is a leadership tool that can be used to uncover, understand, and change inequities that are internal to schools and districts in three areas—teacher quality, educational programs, and student achievement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, G. L. (2001). Promoting educational equity in a period of growing social inequity: The silent contradictions of the Texas reformdis course. Education and Urban Society, 33(3), 321-332.
2.
Artiles, A. J. (1998). The dilemma of difference: Enriching the disproportionality discourse with theory and context. Journal of Special Education, 32(1), 32-36.
3.
Black, B., & Valenzuela, A. (2003). Educational accountability for English language learners in Texas: A retreat from equity. In L. Skrla & J. J. Scheurich (Eds.), Educational equity and accountability: Policies, paradigms, and politics (pp. 215-234). New York: Routledge-Falmer.
4.
Bock, R. D., & Wolfe, R. (1996, March 15). A review and analysis of the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System. Part I: Audit and review of the Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS): Final report. Nashville, TN: Comptroller of the Treasury.
5.
Bowman, D. H. (2003). Report finds suspension disparities in KY. Education Week, 22(25), 6.
6.
Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102(2), 294-343.
7.
Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8.
College Board. (1998). College-bound students set records in racial and ethnic diversity, precollege credit, and grades, but College Board sees growing disparities among subgroups. News from the College Board. Retrieved from http://www.collegeboard.com/press/senior98/html/980901.html
9.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Learning.
10.
Donmoyer, R., & Garcia Wagstaff, J. G. (1990). Principal scan be effective managers and instructional leaders. NASSP Bulletin, 74(525), 20-25, 27-29.
11.
Edmonds, R. R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15-18, 20-24.
12.
Elmore, R. F. (2002). Testing trap. Harvard Magazine, 105(1), 35.
13.
English, F. W. (1988). Curriculum auditing. Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
14.
Ferguson, R. F. (1998). Teachers’ perceptions and expectations and the Black-White test score gap. In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 318-375). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
15.
Ford, D. Y., & Harmon, D. A. (2001). Equity and excellence: Providing access to gifted education for culturally diverse students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11(3), 141-148.
16.
Garcia Wagstaff, J. G. (2000). Baskin elementary school, hope for urban education: A study of nine high-performing, high poverty urban elementary schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
17.
Gregory, J. F. (1995). The crime of punishment: Racial and gender disparities in the use of corporal punishment in U.S. schools. Journal of Negro Education, 64(4), 454-463.
18.
Hall, V. (2002). Reinter pretingentre preneuralism. In C. Reynolds (Ed.), Women and school leadership: International perspectives (pp.13-28). Albany: State University of New York Press.
19.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157-191.
20.
Haney, W. (2001). Response to Skrla et al. The illusion of educational equity in Texas: A commentary on “accountability for equity”. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(3), 267-275.
21.
Ingersoll, R. M. (1999). The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 26-37.
22.
Iowa Department of Education. (2001). The Iowa educational equity review process. Des Moines, IA: Author.
23.
Keating, P. (2000, April). Understanding standards. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Klein, S. (2001). Response to Skrla et al.: Is there a connection between educational equity and accountability? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(3), 261-266.
26.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1997). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools: A descriptive analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 37-62.
28.
Linn, R. L., Baker, L., & Betebenner, D. W. (2002). Accountability systems: Implications of requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Educational Researcher, 31(6), 3-16.
29.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
30.
Losen, D., & Orfield, G. (2002). Racial inequity in special education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Publishing Group.
31.
MacMillan, D. L., & Reschy, D. J. (1998). Overrepresentation of minority students: The case for greater specificity or reconsideration of the variables examined. Journal of Special Education, 32(1), 15-24.
32.
McKenzie, K. B. (2001). White teachers’ perceptions about their students of color and themselves as White educators. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
33.
McKenzie, K. B. (2002, November). Equity traps. Paper presented at the annual convention of the University Council for Educational Administration, Pittsburgh, PA.
34.
Mitchell, J. K., & Poston, W. K. (1992). The equity audit in school reform: Three case studies of educational disparity and incongruity. International Journal of Educational Reform, 1(3), 242-247.
35.
Moll, L. C. (1992). Bilingual classroom studies and community analysis: Some recent trends. Educational Researcher, 20(2), 20-24.
36.
Moses, R. J., & Cobb, C. E., Jr. (2002). Radicalequations: Math literacy and civil rights. Boston: Beacon Press.
37.
Nolly, G. L. (1997). Effective instructional strategies for teaching mathematics to African American children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
38.
Oakes, J. (1986). Keepingtrack: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
39.
O’Day, J. A. (2002). Complexity, accountability, and school improvement. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 293-329.
40.
Parker, L. (2001). Statewide assessment triggers urban school reform: But how high the stakes for urban minorities? Education and Urban Society, 33(3), 313-320.
41.
Pollock, M. (2001). How the question we ask most about race in education is the very question we most suppress. Educational Researcher, 30(9), 2-12.
42.
Poston, W. K. (1992). The equity audit in school reform: Building a theory for educational research. International Journal of Educational Reform, 1(3), 235-241.
43.
Prince, C. D. (2002). The challenge of attracting good teachers and principals to struggling schools. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
44.
Rorrer, A. K. (2003). Intersections in accountability reform: Complexity, local actors, legitimacy, and agendas. In L. Skrla & J. J. Scheurich (Eds.), Educational equity and accountability: Policies, paradigms, and politics (pp. 251-266). New York: Routledge Falmer.
45.
Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. J. (2002). What large-scale, survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement. Consortium for Policy Research in Education, CPRE Research Report Series RR-051.
46.
Sanders, W. L., & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
47.
Scheurich, J. J., & Skrla, L. (2003). Leadership for equity and excellence: Creating high achievement classrooms, schools, and districts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
48.
Scheurich, J. J., Skrla, L., & Johnson, J. F. (2000). Thinking carefully about equity and accountability. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(4), 293-299.
49.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2002). Making mathematics work for all children: Issues of standards, testing, and equity. Educational Researcher, 3(1), 13-25.
50.
Sclafani, S. (2001). Using an aligned system to make real progress for Texas students. Education and Urban Society, 33(3), 305-312.
Sizer, T. (1997). Horace’s hope: What works for the American high school. New York: Mariner Books.
53.
Skiba, R. J., Michael, R. S., & Nardo, A. C. (2003). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. Bloomington: Indiana Educational Policy Center.
54.
Skrla, L. (2001). Accountability, equity, and complexity. Educational Researcher, 30(4), 15-21.
55.
Skrla, L. (2003). Productive campus leadership responses to accountability: Principals as policy mediators. In W. Hoy & C. Miskel (Eds.), Studies in leading and organizing schools: Theory and research in educational administration (pp. 27-50). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
56.
Skrla, L., & Scheurich, J. J. (2001). Displacing deficit thinking in school district leadership. Education and Urban Society, 33(3), 235-259.
57.
Skrla, L., Scheurich, J. J., & Johnson, J. F. (2000). Equity-driven, achievement focused school districts: A report on systemic school success in four Texas school districts serving diverse student populations. Austin, TX: The Charles A. Dana Center. Retrieved from http://www.utdanacenter.org/research/reports/equitydistricts.pdf
58.
Skrla, L., Scheurich, J. J., & Johnson, J. F. (2001). Toward a new consensus on high academic achievement for all children. Education and Urban Society, 33(3), 227-234.
59.
Skrla, L., Scheurich, J. J., Johnson, J. F., & Koschoreck, J. W. (2001a). Accountability for equity: Can state policy leverage social justice? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(3), 237-260.
60.
Skrla, L., Scheurich, J. J., Johnson, J. F., & Koschoreck, J. W. (2001b). Complex and contested constructions of accountability and educational equity. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(3), 277-283.
61.
Sleeter, C. E. (1996). Multicultural education as social activism. Albany: State University of New York Press.
62.
Steffy, B. (1993). The Kentucky education reform. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
Thompson, A. (1992). The ethics and politics of evaluation. Issues in Educational Research, 2(1), 35-44.
66.
Townsend, B. L. (2002). “Testing while Black”: Standards-based school reform and African American learners. Remedial and Special Education, 23(4), 222-231.
67.
Trueba, H. (2001). Polar positions on the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS): Pragmatism and the politics of neglect. Education and Urban Society, 33(3), 333-344.
Valencia, R. R. (1997). The evolution of deficit thinking. London: Falmer.
72.
Valencia, R. R., Valenzuela, A., Sloan, K., & Foley, D. E. (2001). Let’s treat the cause, not the symptoms: Equity and account ability in Texas revisited. Phi Delta Kappan, 83 (4), 318-321.
73.
Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Wheelock, A. (1993). Crossing the tracks. New York: John Muir Publications.
76.
Wilson, A., & Segall, W. (2003, April). Glorification of accountability through federal legislation: Dis-locating meaning swith/in/through the No Child Left BehindAct. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
