This article defines district central office administrators' roles and capacity to support the implementation of school-community partnerships. Findings come from a strategic case study of central office administrators in Oakland, California (1990-2000). Using concepts from organizational learning theory for the theoretical framework, this study demonstrates that supporting collaboration departs significantly from central office administration-as-usual and highlights conditions and capital that enable central office administrators' new roles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Argyris, C. (1976). Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3), 363-375.
2.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
Barfield, D., Brindis, C., Guthrie, L., McDonald, W., Philliber, S., & Scott, B. (1994). The evaluation of New Beginnings: A report for 1994. Accord, NY: Philliber Research Associates.
4.
Barley, S. R. (1990). Images of imaging: Notes on doing longitudinal field work. Organization Science, 1(3), 78-108.
5.
Barley, S. R. (1996). Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringing work into organization studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 404-441.
6.
Barzelay, M. (1992). Breaking through bureaucracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
Blau, P. M. (1963). The dynamics of bureaucracy. New York: John Wiley.
8.
Brown, J. (1998). After being California's governor, why run for mayor of Oakland? (Vol. 1). Oakland, CA: Oaklanders First.
9.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1995). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. In M. D. Cohen & L. S. Sproull (Eds.), Organizational learning (pp. 58-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Bryk, A., Camburn, E., & Louis, K. S. (1996). Professional community in Chicago elementary schools: Facilitating factors and organizational consequences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(Suppl.), 751-781.
11.
Cahill, M. (1993). A documentation report on the New York City Beacons Initiative. New York: Youth Development Institute, Fund for the City of New York.
12.
California Department of Education. (1998). Healthy Start request for applications. Sacramento, CA: Author.
13.
California Department of Education. (1999). After-school learning and safe neighborhoods partnership program request for applications. Sacramento, CA: Author.
14.
Center for the Study of Social Policy. (1995). Building new futures for at-risk youth: Findings from a five-year, multi-site evaluation. Washington, DC: Author.
15.
Cibulka, J. G. (Ed.). (1994). [Special issue]. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30.
16.
City of Oakland. (2000). Blueprint for reinventing Oakland city government. Retrieved January 9, 2001, from www.oaklandnet.org
17.
City of Oakland, Office of the Mayor. (1999). Mayor's goals for 1999-2001. City of Oakland. Retrieved August 20, 1999, from www.oaklandnet.com/government/mayor/goals
18.
Clapp, E. (1939). Community schools in action. New York: Viking.
19.
Coburn, K. G., & Riley, P. A. (2000). Failing grade: Crisis and reform in the Oakland Unified School District. San Francisco: Pacific Research Institute.
20.
Cohen, M. D. (1991). Individual learning and organizational routine: Emerging connections. Organization Science, 2(1), 135-139.
21.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
22.
Commission for Positive Change in the Oakland Public Schools. (1990). Good education in Oakland: Community agenda for positive change. Oakland, CA: Author.
23.
Cook, S. N., & Yanow, D. (1996). Culture and organizational learning. In M. D. Cohen & L. S. Sproull (Eds.), Organizational learning (pp. 430-459). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Covello, L. (1958). The heart is the teacher. New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
Crowson, R. L., & Boyd, W. L. (1993). Coordinated services for children: Designing arks for storms and seas unknown. American Journal of Education, 101(2), 140-179.
26.
Cunningham, L. L., & Mitchell, B. (Eds.). (1990). Educational leadership and changing contexts in families, communities, and schools. Eighty-ninth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
27.
Cznariawska, B. (1997). Narrating the organization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
David and Lucile Packard Foundation. (Ed.). (1992). [Special issue]. The Future of Children: School-Linked Services, 2.
29.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 2002, 6301 Part F Comprehensive School Demonstration Program (2002).
30.
Elmore, R. F. (1979-1980). Backward mapping: Implementation research and policy decisions. Political Science Quarterly, 94(4), 601-616.
31.
Elmore, R. F., & Burney, D. (1997). Investing in teacher learning: Staff development and instructional improvement in Community School District #2, New York City. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
32.
Family Investment Trust. (1995). The Caring Communities planning resource guide: Putting the pieces together. St. Louis, MO: Author.
33.
Feldman, M. S. (1989). Order without design. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
34.
Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10, 803-813.
35.
Fiscal Crisis and Management Assistance Team. (2000). Oakland Unified School District assessment and recovery plans. Sacramento, CA: Author.
36.
Foundation Consortium for School-linked Services. (2002). Pilots to policy: Community systems supporting children to be safe, healthy, and ready for school each day. Statewide conference proceedings. Sacramento, CA: Author.
37.
Gammon, R. (2000, January 20). County says schools are over budget. Oakland Tribune. Retrieved January 20, 2000, from www.newschoice.com
38.
Gladstein, D., & Caldwell, D. (1985). Boundary management in new product teams. Academy of Management Proceedings, pp. 161-165.
39.
Hartley, J. F. (1994). Case studies in organizational research. In C. Cassell & G. Simons (Eds.), Qualitative methods in organizational research: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Herrington, C. D. (1994). Schools as intergovernmental partners: Administrator perceptions of expanded programming for children. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(3), 301-323.
41.
Honig, M. I. (2000, November 4). Managing from the middle: The role of intermediary organizations in complex education policy implementation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, Seattle, WA.
42.
Honig, M. I. (2001). Managing ambiguity: The implementation of complex education policy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
43.
Honig, M. I. (2002, April). Where's the `up' in bottom-up reform? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
44.
Honig, M. I., & Jehl, J. D. (2000). Enhancing federal support for connecting educational improvement strategies and collaborative services. In M. C. Wang & W. L. Boyd (Eds.), Improving results for children and families: Linking collaborative services with school reform efforts. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
45.
Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88-115.
46.
Jehl, J., & Kirst, M. (1992). Getting ready to provide school-linked services: What schools must do. Future of Children, 2(1), 95-106.
47.
Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169-211.
48.
Kentucky State Board for Elementary and Secondary Education. (1994). Planning for progress: The Kentucky Education Reform Act 1994-95, Strategic plan summary. Lexington, KY: Author.
49.
Kimberly, J. R. (1981). Managerial innovation. In P. C. Nystrom & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design, Volume 1: Adapting organizations to their environments (pp. 84-100). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
50.
Knapp, M. S. (1995). How shall we study comprehensive, collaborative services for children and families? Educational Researcher, 24(4), 5-16.
51.
Kreps, D. M. (1990). A course in microeconomic theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
Kruse, S. D., Louis, K. S., & Bryk, A. (1995). An emerging framework for analyzing school professional community. In K. S. Louis & S. D. Kruse (Eds.), Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming schools (pp. 23-44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
53.
Lave, J. (1993). Situated learning in communities of practice. In L. Resnick, J. Levine, & T. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives in socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
54.
Leithwood, K., Aitken, R., & Jantzi, D. (2001). Making schools smarter: A system for monitoring school and district progress (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
55.
Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1995, April). An organizational learning perspective on school responses to central policy initiatives. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
56.
Leithwood, K., Leonard, L., & Sharratt, L. (1998). Conditions fostering organizational learning in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(2), 243-276.
57.
Leithwood, K., & Louis, K. S. (Eds.). (1998). Organizational learning in schools. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
58.
Levinthal, D., & March, J. G. (1981). A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2, 307-333.
59.
Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. American Review of Sociology, 14, 319-340.
60.
Levy, J. E., & Shepardson, W. (1992). A look at current school-linked service efforts. Future of Children: School-Linked Services, 2(1), 44-55.
61.
Louis, K. S. (1998). Reconnecting knowledge utilization and school improvement: Two steps forward, one step back. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (Pt. 2, pp. 1074-1095). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
62.
Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, argument, and persuasion in the policy process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
63.
Malen, B., Ogawa, R., & Kranz, K. (1990). What do we know about school based management? A case study of the literature—A call for research. In W. Clune & J. Witte (Eds.), Choice and control in American education, Volume 2: Decentralization and school restructuring. Philadelphia: Falmer.
64.
March, J. G. (1994a). A primer on decision making. New York: Free Press.
65.
March, J. G. (1994b). Three lectures on efficiency and adaptiveness in organizations. Helsinki, Finland: Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration.
66.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1975). The uncertainty of the past: Organizational learning under ambiguity. European Journal of Political Research, 3, 147-171.
67.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
68.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.
69.
March, J. G., & Shapira, Z. (1987). Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science, 33(11), 1404-1418.
70.
Marks, H. M., Louis, K. S., & Printy, S. M. (2000). The capacity for organizational learning: Implications for pedagogical quality and student achievement. In K. Leithwood (Ed.), Understanding schools as intelligent systems (pp. 239-265). Stamford, CT: JAI.
71.
Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2002). Organizational learning in high-stakes accountability environments: Lessons from an urban school district. In W. Hoy & C. Miskel (Eds.), Theory and research in educational administration (Vol. 1, pp. 1-40). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
72.
Mawhinney, H. B., & Smrekar, C. (1996). Institutional constraints to advocacy in collaborative services. Educational Policy, 10(4), 480-501.
73.
McCorry, J. J. (1978). Marcus Foster and the Oakland Public Schools: Leadership in an urban bureaucracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
74.
McDonnell, L. M., & Elmore, R. F. (1987). Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 133-152.
75.
Merton, R. K. (1987). Three fragments from a sociologist's notebooks: Establishing the phenomenon, specified ignorance, and strategic research materials. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 1-28.
76.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
77.
Nelson, R. R., & Yates, D. (Eds.). (1978). Innovation and implementation in public organizations. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
78.
Oakland School Linked Services Work Group. (1999). Partnership for change II. Oakland, CA: Author.
79.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
80.
Philliber Research Associates. (1994). An evaluation of the Caring Communities program at Walbridge Elementary School. Accord, NY: Author.
81.
Phillips, D. C., & Burbules, N. C. (2000). Postpositivism and educational research. Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield.
82.
Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1(4), 209-229.
83.
Rossman, S. B., & Morley, E. (1995). The national evaluation of Cities in Schools. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
84.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
85.
Scribner, J. P. (1999). Professional development: Untangling the influence of work context on teacher learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(2), 238-266.
86.
Scribner, J. P., Cockrell, K. S., Cockrell, D. H., & Valentine, J. W. (1999). Creating professional communities in schools through organizational learning: An evaluation of a school improvement process. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(1), 130-160.
87.
Skowronek, S. (1982). Building a new American state. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
88.
Smrekar, C. (1994). The missing link in school-linked social service programs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(4), 422-433.
89.
Smylie, M. A., Crowson, R. L., Chou, V., & Levin, R. A. (1994). The principal and community-school connections in Chicago's radical reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(3), 342-364.
90.
Spillane, J. P. (1996). School districts matter: Local educational authorities and state instructional policy. Educational Policy, 10(1), 63-87.
91.
SRI International. (1996a). California's Healthy Start School-Linked Services Initiative: Results for children and families. Menlo Park, CA: Author.
92.
SRI International. (1996b). From principles to action: Local implementation of California's Healthy Start School-Linked Services Initiative. Menlo Park, CA: Author.
93.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
94.
Tyack, D. (1992). Health and social services in public schools: Historical perspectives. Future of Children, 2(1), 19-31.
95.
Tyack, D. B., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
96.
U.S. Department of Education. (1997). Schoolwide programs. Washington, DC: Author.
97.
U.S. Department of Education. (1998). Guidance on the Comprehensive School Reform Demonstration Program. Washington, DC: Author.
98.
U.S. Department of Education. (1999). 21st Century Community Learning Center Program application for grants. Washington, DC: Author.
99.
Urban Strategies Council. (1992). Partnership for change: Linking schools, services, and the community to serve Oakland youth. Oakland, CA: Author.
100.
Urban Strategies Council. (1993). Data match: A tool for advocacy. Oakland, CA: Author.
101.
Vaughn, D. (1996). The Challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
102.
Weatherley, R., & Lipsky, M. (1977). Street-level bureaucrats and institutional innovation: Implementing special-education reform. Harvard Educational Review, 47(2), 171-197.
103.
Wehlage, G., Smith, G., & Lipman, P. (1992). Restructuring urban schools: The New Futures experience. American Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 51-93.
104.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
105.
Weiss, C. (1995). Nothing as practical as good theory. In J. P. Connell, A. C. Kubisch, & L. B. Schorr (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
106.
Weiss, J., & Gruber, J. E. (1984). Using knowledge for control in fragmented policy areas. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 3, 225-247.
107.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
108.
Wildavsky, A. (1996). Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
109.
Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.
110.
Yanow, D. (1996). How does a policy mean? Interpreting policy and organizational actions. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
111.
Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
