This study revisits the existing scholarly debate on the possible impact of the principal's leadership on student achievement. Both `direct effect' and `indirect effect' models are discussed. A quantitative meta-analysis examines to what extent principals directly affect student outcomes. The small positive effects found in this meta-analysis confirm earlier research findings on the limitations of the direct effects approach to linking leadership with student achievement. Finally, lines of future research inquiry are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bosker, R. J., De Vos, H., & Wiziers, B. (2000). Theories and models of educational effectiveness. Enschede, the Netherlands: Twente Unversity Press.
2.
Bosker, R. J., & Witziers, B. (1996, April). The true size of school effects. Paper presented at the AERA, New York.
3.
Bossert, S., Dwyer, D., Rowan, B., & Lee, G. V. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 34-64.
4.
Bredeson, P. V. (1996). New directions in the preparation of educational leaders. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 251-277). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
5.
Brookover, W. B., Beady, C., Flood, P., Schweitzer, J., & Wisenbaker, J. (1979). School social systems and student achievement. Schools can make a difference. New York: Praeger.
6.
Cohen, J. (1989). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Davies, B., & Ellison, L. (1997). School leadership for the 21st century: A competency and knowledge approach. London: Routledge.
8.
Edmonds, R. R. (1979). A discussion of the literature and issues related to effective schooling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education, Center for Urban Studies.
9.
Fullan, M., & Watson, N. (2000). School-based management: Reconceptualization to improve learning outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(4), 453-473.
10.
Hallinger, P. (1989, April). What makes a difference? School context, principal leadership and student achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AERA, San Francisco.
11.
Hallinger, P. (1994). A resource manual for the principal instructional management rating scale. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University, Center for Advanced Study of Educational Leadership.
12.
Hallinger, P., Bickman, L., & Davis, K. (1996). School context, principal leadership and student reading achievement. Elementary School Journal, 96(5), 527-549.
13.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996, April). The principal's role in school effectiveness: An assessment of methodological progress, 1980-1995. Paper presented at the AERA, New York.
14.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principals' contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157-191.
15.
Hill, P. W., Rowe, K. J., & Holmes-Smith, P. (1995, January). Factors affecting students' educational progress: Multilevel modeling of educational effectiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ICSEI, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.
16.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (1991). Educational administration. Theory, research, and practice (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
17.
Hughes, M. (1985). Leadership in professionally staffed organizations. In M. Hughes, P. Ribbins, & H. Thomas (Eds.), Managing education (pp. 262-290). London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
18.
Imants, J. (1996). Leiding geven aan onderwijs! Onderwijskundig leiderschap en taakdifferentiatie in basisscholen [Leadership in education! Educational leadership and task differentiation in primary schools]. Leiden, the Netherlands: DSWO Press.
19.
Krüger, M. L. (1995). Schoolleiderschap en schooleffectiviteit: Op weg naar een model voor onderzoek [School leadership and school effectiveness: Towards a research model]. Pedagogische Studiën, 72, 404-423.
20.
Krüger, M. L., Witziers, B., Sleegers, P. J. C., & Imants, J. (1999). Onderwijskundig leiderschap in moderne onderwijsinstellingen [Educational leadership in modern educational organizations]. In B. P. M. Creemers, M. L. Krüger, & C. A. Van Vilsteren (Eds.), Handboek schoolorganisatie en onderwijsmanagement (pp. C4120.1-C4120.26). Alphen a/d Rijn, the Netherlands: Samson H. D. Tjeenk Willink.
21.
Lamberts, P. C., & Abrams, K. R. (1995). Meta-analysis using multilevel models. Multilevel Modelling Newsletter, 7(2), 17-19.
22.
Leithwood, K. (1992). The move to transformational leadership. Educational Leadership, 49(5), 8-12.
23.
Leithwood, K. (1995). Cognitive perspectives on school leaders. Journal of School Leadership, 5, 115-135.
24.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1990). Transformational leadership: How principals can help reform school cultures. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1(4), 249-280.
25.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000). Principal and teacher leadership effects: A replication. School Leadership & Management, 20(4), 415-434.
26.
Leithwood, K., & Menzies, T. (1998). Forms and effects of school-based management: A review. Educational Policy, 12(3), 325-346.
27.
Leithwood, K., & Montgomery, D. (1982). The role of the elementary principal in program improvement. Review of Educational Research, 52, 309-339.
28.
Leithwood, K., Tomlinson, D., & Genge, M. (1996). Transformational leadership. In K. Leithwood, J. Chapman, D. Corson, P. Hallinger, & A. Hart (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 785-840). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
29.
Levine, D. U., & Lezotte, L. W. (1990). Unusually effective schools: A review and analysis of research and practice. Madison, WI: National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development.
30.
Maslowski, R. (2001). School culture and school performance. An explorative study into the organizational culture of secondary schools and their effects. Enschede, the Netherlands: Twente University Press.
31.
Murphy, J. (1988). Methodological, measurement and conceptual problems in the study of instructional leadership. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4(4), 290-310.
32.
Pitner, N. (1988). The study of administrator effects and effectiveness. In N. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research in educational administration (pp. 99-122). New York: Longman.
33.
Postlethwaite, N., & Ross, K. (1993). Effective schools in reading: Implications for educational planners. Den Haag, the Netherlands: IEA.
34.
Pounder, D. G., Ogawa, R. T., & Adams, E. A. (1995). Leadership as an organization-wide phenomenon: Its impact on school performance. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(4), 564-588.
35.
Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363-377.
36.
Rasbash, J., & Woodhouse, G. (1995). MLn command reference. London: University of London, Institute of Education, Multilevel Models Project.
37.
Raudenbush, S. W. (1994). Random effects models. In H. Cooper, & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 301-323). New York: Russell Sage.
38.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (1985). Empirical Bayes meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 10, 75-98.
39.
Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231-245). New York: Russell Sage.
40.
Rutter, M., Maugham, B., Mortimore, P., Ouston, J., & Smith, A. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours. Secondary Schools and their effects on children. Somerset, UK: Open Books.
41.
Sammons, P., Hillman, J., & Mortimore, P. (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools: A review of school effectiveness research. London: OFSTED.
42.
Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
43.
Silins, H. (1994). The relationship between transformational and transactional leadership and school improvement outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(3), 272-298.
44.
Sleegers, P. J. C. (1991). School en beleidsvoering [Schools and policy making]. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.
45.
Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1993). Schools make a difference. Lessons learned from a 10 year study of school effects. New York: Teachers College Press.
46.
Van de Grift, W. (1990). Educational leadership and academic achievement in elementary education. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1(3), 26-40.
47.
Van de Grift, W., & Houtveen, A. A. M. (1999). Educational leadership and pupil achievement in primary education. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(4), 373-389.
48.
Wildy, H., & Louden, W. (2000). School restructuring and the dilemmas of principals' work. Educational Management & Administration, 28(2), 173-184.
