This article examines the nature of organizational learning and the leadership practices and processes that foster organizational learning in Australian high schools. A path model is used to test the relationships between school-level factors and school outcome measures in terms of students'participation in and engagement with school. The importance of reconceptualizing schools as learning organizations to promote successful school change is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, R. J., & Khoo, S. T. (1993). Quest—The interactive test analysis system. Hawthorn, Canada: ACER.
2.
Ainley, J. (1994, April). Multiple indicators of high school effectiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
3.
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1978). Organisational learning: A theory of action perspective. London: Addison-Wesley.
4.
Beare, H., Caldwell, B. J., & Millikan, R. H. (1989). Creating an excellent school: Some new management techniques. New York: Routledge.
5.
Berends, M., Heilbrunn, J., McKelvey, C., & Sullivan, T. (1998). Monitoring the progress of new American schools: A description of implementing schools in a longitudinal sample (Draft series paper DRU-1935-NAS). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
6.
Bishop, P., & Mulford, W. (1999). When will they ever learn? Another failure of centrally imposed change. School Leadership and Management, 19(2), 17-187.
7.
Blase, J. (1993). The micropolitics of effective school-based leadership: Teachers'perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 29(2), 142-163.
8.
Bodilly, S. (1998). Lessons from new American schools' scale-up phase. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
9.
Cartwright, D. (1965). Influence, leadership, control. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 1-47). Chicago: Rand McNally.
10.
Chapman, J. (1997). Leading the learning community. Leading and Managing, 3(3), 151-170.
11.
Craven, R., Marsh, H., & Print, M. (1997, November). New times, new programs for gifted and talented students: Impact on self-concept, achievement and motivation. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Brisbane, Australia.
12.
Deal, T. (1990). Reframing reform. Educational Leadership, 47(8), 6-12.
13.
Deal, T., & Peterson, K. (1994). The leadership paradox: Balancing logic and artistry in schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Donahoe, T. (1993). Finding the way: Structure, time, and culture in school improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 298-305.
15.
Duke, D., & Leithwood, K. (1994). Defining effective leadership for Connecticut's schools [Monograph]. Hartford: University of Connecticut, Connecticut Administrator Appraisal Project.
16.
Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117-142.
17.
Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement & students at risk [Microfiche]. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 362 322)
18.
Finn, J. D., & Cox, D. (1992). Participation and withdrawal among fourth-grade pupils. American Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 141-162.
19.
Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces. London: Falmer.
20.
Fullan, M. (1995). The school as a learning organization: Distant dreams. Theory Into Practice, 34(4), 230-235.
21.
Hallinger, P., Murphy, J., & Hausman, C. (1991, April). Conceptualizing school restructuring: Principals'and teachers'perceptions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
22.
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. F. (1986). The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education, 94, 328-355.
23.
Jöreskog, J. D., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL VI: Users'reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software.
24.
Kaplan, A. (1997). Scientific methods in educational research. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook (2nd ed., pp. 112-119). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
25.
Keeves, J. P. (1986). Aspiration, motivation and achievement: Different methods on analysis and different results. International Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 115-243.
26.
Kinney, D. A. (1993). From nerds to normals: The recovery of identity among adolescents from middle school to high school. Sociology of Education, 66, 21-40.
27.
Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1993). Effects of school restructuring on the achievement and engagement of middle-grade students. Sociology of Education, 66, 164-187.
28.
Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498-518.
29.
Leithwood, K. (Ed.). (1998). International handbook on educational leadership. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
30.
Leithwood, K., Dart, B., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1993). Building commitment for change and fostering organizational learning (Final report for phase four of the research project: Implementing British Columbia's Education Policy). Vancouver, Canada: British Columbia Ministry of Education.
31.
Leithwood, K., & Duke, D. (1999). A century's quest to understand school leadership. In J. Murphy & K. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
32.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1998, April). Distributed leadership and student engagement in school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego.
33.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1999). The relative effects of principal and teacher sources of leadership on student engagement with school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(Suppl.), 679-706.
34.
Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
35.
Leithwood, K., Leonard, L., & Sharratt, L. (1998). Conditions fostering organizational learning in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(2), 243-276.
36.
Leithwood, K., & Louis, K. S. (Eds.). (1998). Organizational learning in schools. Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
37.
Limerick, B., & Nielsen, H. (Eds.). (1995). School and community relations. Sydney, Australia: Harcourt Brace.
38.
Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
Louis, K. S. (1994). Beyond “managed change”: Rethinking how schools improve. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(1), 2-24.
40.
Marks, H. M., Louis, K. S., & Printy, S. M. (2000). The capacity for organizational learning: Implications for pedagogical quality and student achievement. In K. Leithwood & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Understanding schools as intelligent systems. Greenwood, CT: JAI.
41.
Marquardt, M. (1996). Building the learning organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.
42.
Marsh, H. W. (1992). Extracurricular activities: Beneficial extension of the traditional curriculum or subversion of academic goals? Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 553-562.
43.
Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. (1997). Academic self-concept: Beyond the dustbowl. In G. D. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of classroom assessment learning, achievement and adjustment (pp. 131-198). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
44.
Martin, W., & Willower, D. (1981). The managerial behaviour of high school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 17(1), 69-90.
45.
McLaughlin, M. (1998). Listening and learning from the field: Tales of policy implementation and situated practice. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
46.
Mitchell, C. (1995). Teachers learning together: Organisational learning in an elementary school. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.
47.
Mulford, W. (1994). Shaping tomorrow's schools (Monograph No. 15). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Administration.
48.
Mulford, W. (1998). Organisational learning and educational change. In A. Hargreaves, A. Liebermann, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of international change. London: Kluwer Academic.
49.
Mulford, W., & Silins, H. (1998, September). School leadership for organisational learning and student outcomes: The LOLSO project. Showcase paper presented at the ACEA National Conference, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
50.
Murphy, J., & Hallinger, P. (1993). Restructuring schooling: Learning from ongoing efforts. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
51.
Newmann, F. M. (1989). Student engagement and high school reform. Educational Leadership, 46(5), 34-36.
52.
O'Brien, E., & Rollefson, M. (1996). Extracurricular participation and student engagement. Washington, DC: National Centre for Educational Statistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED384097)
53.
Ogawa, R. T., & Bossert, S. T. (1995). Leadership as an organizational quality. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(2), 224-243.
54.
Pounder, D. G., Ogawa, R. T., & Adams, E. A. (1995). Leadership as an organization-wide phenomena: Its impact on school performance. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(4), 564-588.
55.
Reitzug, U. (1994). A case study of empowering principal behavior. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 283-307.
56.
Ross, K. N., & Wilson, M. (1997). Sampling errors in survey research. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research methodology, and measurement: An international handbook (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
57.
Sackney, L., Walker, K., & Hajnal, V. (1995, April). Organisational learning, leadership, and selected factors related to the institutionalization of school improvement initiatives. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association meeting, San Francisco.
58.
Sellin, N. (1990). PLSPATH Version 3.01 program manual. Hamburg, Germany: Hamburg University.
59.
Sellin, N., & Keeves, J. P. (1997). Path analysis with latent variables. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook (2nd ed., pp. 633-640). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
60.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline. New York: Doubleday/Currency.
61.
Sheppard, B., & Brown, J. (1999, April). Leadership approach, the new work of teachers and successful change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
62.
Silins, H., & Mulford, W. (in press). Leadership and school results. In P. Hallinger & K. Leithwood (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration. Dordrect, the Netherlands: Kluwer Press.
63.
Silins, H., Mulford, B., Zarins, S., & Bishop, P. (2000). Leadership for organisational learning in Australian secondary schools. In K. Leithwood (Ed.), Understanding schools as intelligent systems. Greenwood, CT: JAI.
64.
Silins, H., Zarins, S., & Mulford, B. (2001). What characteristics and processes define a school as a learning organisation? Is this a useful concept to apply to schools? International Education Journal, 3(1), 24-32. Available from http://iej.cjb.net
65.
Silins, H., Zarins, S., Mulford, W., & Bishop, P. (1999, April). Leadership for organisational learning and student outcomes: The LOLSO project. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
66.
Silins, H. C. (1992). Effective leadership for school reform. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 38(4), 317-334.
67.
Silins, H. C. (1994). Leadership characteristics and school improvement. Australian Journal of Education, 38(3), 266-281.
68.
Silins, H. C., & Murray-Harvey, R. (1999). What makes a good senior secondary school? Journal of Educational Administration, 37(4), 329-344.
69.
Smylie, M., Lazarus, V., & Brownlee-Conyers, J. (1996). Instructional outcomes of school-based participative decision making. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18(3), 191-198.
70.
Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1996). Changing our schools: Lining school effectiveness and school improvement. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
71.
Tannenbaum, A. S. (1962). Control in organizations: Individual adjustment and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 7, 236-257.
72.
Van Den Berg, R., & Sleegers, P. (1996). The innovative capacity of secondary schools: A qualitative study. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 9(2), 201-223.
73.
Watkins, K., & Marsick, V. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
74.
Wohlstetter, P., Smyer, R., & Mohrman, S. A. (1994). New boundaries for school-based management: The high involvement model. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16, 268-286.
75.
Wohlstetter, P., Van Kirk, A. N., Robertson, P. J., & Mohrman, S. A. (1997). Organizing for successful school-based management. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
