Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Hypothetical job candidates varying in chronological age and national origin were created through the use of paper credentials designed to depict them as candidates for either a teaching position or an assistant principal position. These credentials were mailed to a national random sample of high school principals, and these principals were requested to screen the credentials of candidates as if these persons were seeking a position within their school building. Ratings of principals were cast into a 3×3×2 factorial design and submitted to a multivariate analysis of variance. Results indicate that screening decisions made by high school principals are influenced by the chronological age and national origin of candidates and type of focal position sought. These results are examined through the lens of social distance theory, and this theory is used to interpolate effects likely for future job candidates at the screening stage of the selection process.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 681 et seq. (1967).

Arvey, R. D. , & Faley, R. H. (1992). Fairness in selecting employees (2nd ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley.

Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Test of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 77-85.

Bogardus, E. S. (1967). Measuring social distances. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement (pp. 71-76). New York: John Wiley.

Bowman J. S. (1998). The relationship between applicant age ad evaluator age in pre-interview screening of teacher applicants. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.

Byrne, D. (1961). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(3), 713-715.

Cable, D. M. , & Gilovich, T. (1998). Looked over or overlooked? Prescreening decisions and postinterview evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 501-508.

Castetter, W. B. , & Young, I. P. (2000). The personnel function in educational administration. Columbus, MO: Prentice Hall.

Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test forthe numberof factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.

10.

Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 253, 42 U.S.C. 2000e (West 1996).

11.

Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.

12.

Gorman, C. D. , Clover, W. H. , & Doherty, M. E. (1978). Can we learn anything about interviewing real people from interviews of paper people? Two studies of the external validity paradigm. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 165-192.

13.

Hazelwood School District v. United States, 433 U.S. 299 (1977).

14.

Heneman, H. G. , Heneman, R. L. , & Judge, T. A. (1997). Staffing organizations (2nd ed.). Middleton, WI: Mendota House.

15.

Michigan State University. (1997). Elementary and secondary teacher education report based on supply and demand for graduation in 1994-1995. Unpublished manuscript, East Lansing: Author.

16.

Miller-Smith, K. R. (2001). Effects of organizational representative, school district performance and site-based reform status on teacher screening decisions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.

17.

Reis, S. B. , Young, I. P. , & Jury, J. C. (1999). Female administrators: A crack in the glass ceiling. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13, 71-82.

18.

Stallard, J. B. (1990). An investigation of factors in resumes that influence the selection of teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.

19.

Triandis, H. C. , & Triandis, L. M. (1967). Some studies of social distance. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement (pp. 199-207). New York: John Wiley.

20.

Wanous, J. P. , & Reichers, A. E. (1998). Estimating the reliability of a single item measurer. Psychological Reports, 78, 631-634.

21.

Winter, P. A. (1997). Educational recruitment and selection: A review of recent studies and recommendations forbest practice. In L. Wildman (Ed.), Fifth NCPEA yearbook. Lancaster, PA: Technomic.

22.

Young, I. P. , & Pounder, D.G. (1985). Salient factors affecting decision making in simulated teacherselection interviews. Journal of Educational Equity and Leadership, 5, 216-233.

23.

Young, I. P. , & Prince, A. L. (1999). Legal implications for teacher selection as defined by the ADA and the ADEA. Journal of Law and Education, 28, 517-529.

24.

Young, I. P. , Rinehart, J. S. , & Baits, D. M. (1997). Age discrimination: Impact of chronological age and perceived position demands on teacher screening decisions. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 30, 103-112.

Asian,Hispanic,and Native American Job Candidates: Prescreened or Screened within the Selection Process

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References