The instructional cohort is a popular delivery format in educational administration programs. This case study delves into the “black box” of cohort learning by critically examining the relationship between group dynamics and the types of learning that took place among a set of group members within a cohort. This study shows how group dynamics— including group climate, norms, roles, and communication—can foster or impede learning. The study raises concerns about whether a focus on high-performing cohorts or groups necessarily results in meaningful learning for students. With the performance-learning tension in mind, implications and recommendations for instruction and future research are also presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bales, R. F. (1970). Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
2.
Barnett, B. G. , Basom, M. R., Yerkes, D. M., & Norris, C. J. (2000). Cohorts in educational leadership preparation programs: Benefits, difficulties, and the potential for developing school leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(2), 255-282.
3.
Basom, M. , Yerkes, D., Norris, C., & Barnett, B. (1996). Using cohorts as a means for developing transformational leaders. Journal of School Leadership, 6(1), 99-112.
4.
Biddle, B. J. (1979). Role theory: Expectations, identities, and behaviors. New York: Academic Press.
5.
Bormann, E. G. (1975). Discussion and group methods: Theory and practice. New York: Harper and Row.
6.
Bormann, E. G. (1990). Communicating in small groups: Theory and practice (5th ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
7.
Bredeson, P. V. (1991, April). Reappraising personal experience in the preparation of school administrators. Journal of School Leadership, 1, 176-189.
8.
Bruffee, K. A. (1999). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
9.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.
10.
Druskat, V. U. , & Kayes, D. C. (2000). Learning versus performance in short-term project teams. Small Group Research, 31(3), 328-353.
11.
Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Falmer.
12.
Feldman, D. C. (1984). The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review, 9, 47-53.
13.
Frey, L. R. , Gouran, D. S., & Poole, M. S. (Eds.). (1999). The handbook of group communication theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Glesne, C. , & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. White Plains, NY: Longman.
15.
Hackman, J. R. (Ed.). (1990). Groups that work (and those that don’t): Creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16.
Hackman, J. R. (1998). Why teams don’t work. In R. S. Tindale, L. Heath, J. Edwards, E. J. Posavac, F. B. Bryant, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, E. H. Henderson-King, & J. Myers (Eds.), Theory and research on small groups (pp. 245-267). New York: Plenum.
17.
Hare, A. P. , Blumberg, H. H., Davies, M. F., & Kent, M. V. (1994). Small group research: A handbook. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
18.
Hirokawa, R. Y. , & Salazar, A. J. (1999). Task-group communication and decision-making performance. In L. R. Frey, D. S. Gouran, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 167-191). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Jarvis, P. (1987). Meaningful and meaningless experience: Towards an analysis of learning from life. Adult Education Quarterly, 37(3), 164-172.
20.
Jarvis, P. (1997). Learning practical knowledge. In L. Kydd, M. Crawford, & C. Riches (Eds.), Professional development for educational management (pp. 26-36). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
21.
Johnson, D. W. , & Johnson, R. T. (1998). Cooperative learning and social interdependence theory. In R. S. Tindale, L. Heath, J. Edwards, E. J. Posavac, F. B. Bryant, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, E. H. Henderson-King, & J. Myers (Eds.), Theory and research on small groups (pp. 9-35). New York: Plenum.
22.
Keyton, J. (1999). Relational communication in groups. In L. R. Frey, D. S. Gouran, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 192-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Kleiner, A. (1996). The age of heretics: Heroes, outlaws, and the forerunners of corporate change. New York: Currency and Doubleday.
24.
Lipman-Blumen, J. , & Leavitt, H. J. (1999). Hot groups: Seeding them, feeding them, and using them to ignite your organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
Marsick, V. J. , & Watkins, K. E. (1990). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. London: Routledge.
26.
Mezirow, J., & Associates . (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
27.
Milstein, M. M. , & Kreuger, J. (1993). Changing the way we prepare educational leaders: The Danforth experience. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
28.
Norris, C. , & Barnett, B. (1994, October). Cultivating a new leadership paradigm: From cohorts to communities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Philadelphia.
29.
Odden, A. (1995). Educational leadership for America’s schools: An introduction to organization and policy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
30.
Reynolds, K. C. , & Hebert, F. T. (1995). Cohort formats and intensive schedules: Added involvement and interaction forcontinuing highereducation. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 43(3), 34-41.
31.
Reynolds, K. C. , & Hebert, F. T. (1998). Learning achievements of students in cohort groups. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 46(3), 34-42.
32.
Salazar, A. J. (1996). An analysis of the development and evolution of roles in the small group. Small Group Research, 27, 475-503.
33.
Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
34.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
35.
Short, P. M. , & Twale, D. (1994). Educational administrators as leaders: Instructional implications. In T. Mulkeen, N. Cambron-McCabe, & B. Anderson (Eds.), Developing democratic leadership: The changing context of administrative preparation programs (pp. 133-144). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
36.
Strauss, A. , & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37.
Twale, D. , & Kochan, F. (2000). Assessment of an alternative cohort model for part-time students in an educational leadership program. Journal of School Leadership, 10(2), 188-208.
38.
Wesson, L. , Holman, S., Holman, N., Cox, D.Cohesion or collusion: Impact of a cohort structure on educational leadership doctoral students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
39.
Wittenbaum, G. M. , Vaughan, S. I., & Stasser, G. (1998). Coordination in task performing groups. In R. S. Tindale, L. Heath, J. Edwards, E. J. Posavac, F. B. Bryant, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, E. H. Henderson-King, & J. Myers (Eds.), Theory and research on small groups (pp. 177-204). New York: Plenum.
40.
Yerkes, D. M. , Basom, M. R., Norris, C., & Barnett, B. (1995, August). Using cohorts in the development of educational leaders. Paper presented at the annual International Conference of the Association of Management, Vancouver, Canada.
41.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
