Accountability is a complex idea frequently invoked as political rhetoric. Accordingly, a theoretical framework that includes bureaucratic, performance, market, and professional models of accountability is necessary to analyze the accountability system created for Arizona charter schools. Using a qualitative case study that relied on observations, interviews, and document analysis, this case indicated that valid and reliable performance data are not an intrinsic element of a school choice program. Accordingly, mechanisms that capture and distribute accurate, accessible, and wide-ranging information about schools of choice will assist consumers in making informed decisions when selecting among schools.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality, uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488-500.
2.
Arizona Revised Statute §15-183 (2000). Retrieved March 1, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.azleg.state.az.us/ars/15/183.htm
3.
Arizona Revised Statute §15-185 (2000). Retrieved March 1, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.azleg.state.az.us/ars/15/185.htm
4.
Arizona Revised Statute §15-271 (2000). Retrieved March 1, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.azleg.state.az.us/ars/15/271.htm
5.
Boyd, W. L. , & Lugg, C. A. (1998). Markets, choice and educational change. In A. Hargraves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change: Part one (pp. 349-374). Boston: Kluwer. Retrieved February 8, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/i/6/i6b/marketschoice.htm
6.
Bulkley, K. (1999). Charter school authorizers: A new governance mechanism?Educational Policy, 13(5), 674-697.
7.
The Center for Education Reform. (2001). Charter school highlights and statistics [Online]. Retrieved February 22, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.edreform.com/pubs/chglance.htm
8.
Chubb, J. E. , & Moe, T. M. (1988). What price democracy? Politics, markets and American schools. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
9.
Chubb, J. E. , & Moe, T. M. (1990a, Summer). Choice is a panacea. Brookings Review, 8(3), 4-12.
10.
Chubb, J. E. , & Moe, T. M. (1990b). Politics markets and America’s schools. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
11.
Cuban, L. (1988). The managerial imperative: The practice of leadership in schools. New York: New York University Press.
12.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1988, Winter). Accountability and teacher professionalism. American Educator, 12(4), 8-13, 38-43.
13.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1989, Fall). Accountability for professional practice. Teachers College Record, 91(1), 59-80.
14.
Firestone, W. , & Bader, B. (1992). Redesigning teaching: Professionalism or bureaucracy?Albany: State University of New York Press.
15.
Garn, G. (1999). Solving the policy implementation problem: The case of Arizona charter schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7(26) [Online]. Retrieved January 22, 1999, from the World Wide Web: http://olam.ed.asu.edu/epaa/v6n1/
16.
Gintis, H. (1995). The political economy of school choice. Teachers College Record, 96(3), 492-511.
17.
Glass, G. V. (1972, June). The many faces of educational accountability: What is genuine accountability and what is sham?Phi Delta Kappan, 53, 636-639.
18.
Gold, R. L. (1969). Roles in sociological field observation. In G. McCall & J. L. Simmons (Eds.), Issues in participant observation (pp. 30-39). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
19.
Haggerty, M. D., & Sauv, R. (1999, June 28). USFRCS Memorandum No. 24, Office of the Auditor General and Arizona Department of Education.
20.
Hansen, J. B. (1993). Is educational reform thorough mandated accountability an oxymoron?Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 26, 11-21.
21.
Hertz, R. , & Imber, J. B. (Eds.). (1995). Studying elites using qualitative methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
House, E. R. (1993). Professional evaluation: Social impact and political consequences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
Kirp, D. (1982). Profesionalization as a policy choice. World Politics, 34(2), 137-174.
24.
Kirst, M. (1990). Accountability: Implications for state and local policymakers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Information Services.
25.
Levin, H. (1974). A conceptual framework for accountability in education. School Review, 82, 363-391.
26.
Levin, H. M. (1997, December). Educational vouchers: Effectiveness, choice, and costs. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Economics Association, New Orleans, LA [Online]. Retrieved October 23, 1997, from the World Wide Web: http://epn.org/sage/97levin.html
27.
Lincoln, Y. S. , & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Mattern, H. (1994, October 4). It’s not much now. It’s humble, but that will change: Phoenix site will give rise to one of state’s 1st charter schools. Arizona Republic, p. A1-A1.
30.
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32.
Miles, M. B. , & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Newmann, F. M. , King, B. M., & Rigdon, M. (1997, Spring). Accountability and school performance: Implications from restructuring schools. Harvard Educational Review, 67(1), 41-74.
34.
Nowicki, D. (1998, August 28). Governor aims at charters: Says schools need more oversight from state, better business plans. Tempe Tribune, pp. A1-A1, A4-A4.
Richards, C. E. (1988, March). Indicators and three types of educational monitoring systems: Implications for design. Phi Delta Kappan, 69(7), 495-499.
37.
Rivera, M. J. (1994). Accountability and educational reform in Rochester, New York (Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, 1994). DAI 55 NO7A:1775. (University Microfilms No. 9432425)
38.
Shepard, L. A. (1991). Will national tests improve student learning?Phi Delta Kappan, 73(3), 232-238.
39.
Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
40.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
U.S. Department of Education. (1999). The state of charter schools third-year report [Online]. Retrieved March 1, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.ed.gov/pubs/charter3rdyear/C.html
42.
Wohlstetter, P. (1991). Accountability mechanisms for state education reform: Some organizational alternatives. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13(1), 31-48.
43.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
